60 Years Later, Reflections On Brown vs. Board of Education


“Life is not what one lived, but what one remembers and how one remembers to recount it.” — Gabriel García Márquez

I was born at the end of the great depression during Jim Crow and came of age in Baltimore during the Civil Rights Movement.

Everything was segregated throughout my childhood, but I didn’t realize there was anything inherently wrong with this system as a little girl.

After all, my education in an all-black school meant I learned about my culture.

We studied black scholars, poets, inventors, and scientists as if every day was Black History Month.

But by the 1950s, as I entered high school, things started to change. On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court declared the doctrine of “separate but equal” unconstitutional, and the Brown v. Board of Education decision lit a fire in Baltimore.

I still remember watching the news that evening. While plenty of white people are screaming about the decision, I most vividly recall Mrs. Mildred Coughlin’s reaction, Western High School’s principal. She was gracious and calm with beautifully styled white hair and dressed in a soft pink suit. “I will never see a colored girl graduate from my school,” she firmly stated.

Her school, Western High School, was one of the best in Baltimore.

But things started to happen quickly then — at least for me.

Baltimore became one of the first cities in the United States to integrate public schools thanks largely to Walter Sondheim, Jr., who became president of the Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City immediately after the Brown vs. Board decision.

Along with CORE, the NAACP, The Urban League, other civil rights organizations had actively pushed to make Maryland — the gateway to the south — the first state south of the Mason-Dixon Line to accept the Brown decision. If Maryland could implement civil rights objectives, the thinking went, maybe the South could too.

By June 1954, Dr. John H. Fisher, the superintendent of schools for Baltimore, detailed a four-point integration program for all public schools and the Board of Education approved it unanimously.

By August, I was told that four other black girls and I would be attending Western High School – Mrs. Mildred Coughlin’s school — for our junior year.
While things did not go so smoothly on the other side of town — there were protests and boycotts at Southern High – my experience was remarkably smooth.

At Western High School, the students and teachers were perfectly nice, including Mrs. Coughlin, who was always courteous.

Although no one spoke to me, no one was overtly racist, as if they had all been taught that if you cannot say something nice, do not say anything at all.

Due to curriculum choices, the five of us were in different classes, so I was alone a lot.

Without anyone to share notes with or engage with daily, my high school experience was a tranquil one, totally free of social interactions or events.

I knew better than to complain to my mother, whose first comment would have been, “You’re not supposed to be talking in school anyways; you’re supposed to be learning.” So I guess I learned a lot since I didn’t have anything else to do.

Regardless, in the end, all five of us got through.

But in May of 1956, just one month before graduation, Mrs. Coughlin did a funny thing. While we were all ready to graduate, having done everything we were supposed to do, she turned her face to the wall and died.

Mrs. Coughlin kept her promise. She never did see a colored girl graduate from her school — a feat so petty, I’m still not sure I’m at terms with it, 58 years later.

For information on serving legal papers, contact a Professional Process Service, call (800) 774-6922. Representatives are available Monday-Friday 8 am – 8 pm EST.  If you found this article helpful, please consider donating.  Thank you for following our blog, A space dedicated to bringing you news on breaking legal developments, interesting articles for law professionals, and educational material for all. We hope that you enjoy your time on our blog and revisit us!  We also invite you to check out our Frequently Asked Questions About Process Servers.

This entry was posted in Legal Material on by .


The information contained herein has been prepared in compliance with Section 107 of the Copyright Act. Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works. The articles/Images contained herein serve as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, educational, and research-as examples of activities that qualify as fair use. Undisputed Legal Inc. is a Process Service Agency and “Not A Law Firm” therefore the articles/images contained herein are for educational purposes only, and not intended as legal advice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *