Why Lawyers Need to Advise Clients to Stay Off Social Media

Social Media

By: Mark Wilson, Esq.

Social media is a mixed blessing. Sure, it allows instantaneous communications with friends and family (especially over cat photos), but it also allows clients to make terrible decisions at the push of a button. Part of your initial meeting with a client should be a brief overview of why the client should stay away from Facebook and Twitter (and others).

Clients are big boys and girls, so why should you take on the Herculean task of telling them not to respond to that itch to comment?


1. ‘Cause Ya Gotta.

The North Carolina State Bar issued a formal ethics opinion in July declaring that a lawyer has an ethical duty to know about social media and, if necessary, to “advise the client of the legal ramifications of existing postings, future postings, and third party comments.” Once the suit commences, however, be careful. Advising the client to remove posts might violate the lawyer’s duty to preserve evidence. In any event, the ubiquity of social media means part of your duty to advise your client includes advising about social media.

2. ‘Cause They’re Going to Breach Their Settlement Agreement.

The case of Patrick Snay comes to mind. Snay won an $80,000 judgment against his former employer, but the settlement terms were confidential. His daughter posted on Facebook, “Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver. Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT.” And guess who was back in court for breaching the confidentiality agreement — and lost all that vacation money?

3. ‘Cause Its Evidence.

After posting on Facebook about being involved in a fatal accident in 2012, prosecutors used Facebook posts to charge Megan Merkel with vehicular manslaughter. Anything client posts or has posted on Facebook is fair game for use in court, and nothing prevents an ostensibly “private” post from being forwarded to law enforcement, the court, or opposing counsel. And, of course, there’s good old James Elonis.

4. ‘Cause They’re Violating Their Restraining Order.

Yes, Virginia, sending a tweet to your ex can violate the terms of a restraining order. In addition to being considered “contact” in general, more tech-savvy judges add clauses to restraining orders to emphasize that the enjoined parties can’t contact each other through social media. Sending that tweet is the equivalent of showing up at your ex’s house.

5. ‘Cause It’s Bad Publicity.

A client venting about a case on social media can draw unnecessary attention to the case or issue (remember Amy’s Baking Company?). A case headed for easy settlement could quickly turn south as the party against whom the tweet or post is made livid and demands to go to trial. And if the client is especially high profile already, you’ll be on full P.R. alert in addition to being the lawyer (quick, someone gets Olivia Pope on the phone!).

For information on serving legal papers, contact a Professional Process Service, call (800) 774-6922. Representatives are available Monday-Friday 8 am – 8 pm EST.  If you found this article helpful, please consider donating.  Thank you for following our blog, A space dedicated to bringing you news on breaking legal developments, interesting articles for law professionals, and educational material for all. We hope that you enjoy your time on our blog and revisit us!  We also invite you to check out our Frequently Asked Questions About Process Servers.


This entry was posted in Legal Material on by .


The information contained herein has been prepared in compliance with Section 107 of the Copyright Act. Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works. The articles/Images contained herein serve as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, educational, and research-as examples of activities that qualify as fair use. Undisputed Legal Inc. is a Process Service Agency and “Not A Law Firm” therefore the articles/images contained herein are for educational purposes only, and not intended as legal advice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *