How Section 230 Impact Shapes Internet Freedom & Responsibility


This article will provide guidance on How Section 230 Impact Shapes Internet Freedom & Responsibility. Twenty-six words from a 1996 US law overhauling telecommunications have been termed the basis of the Internet’s current state. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act says that any ‘interactive computer service’ is not liable to be considered a publisher or speaker for any content created by a third party. Effectively, this protects host websites from litigation for illegal content published by the user, mainly since section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an “interactive computer service” who publish information provided by third-party users. Secondary protection in the statute is the ‘Good Samaritan’ clause, which protects liability for interactive computer services operators when they take down speech or third-party content that is obscene or considered offensive in good faith. Click here to watch our introduction video.

Background on the Communications Decency Act

Section 230 was established in reaction to a pair of claims against Internet Service Providers (ISPs) in the early 1990s. After the Telecommunications Act, the Supreme Court held in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997) that parts of the Act went against the Constitution, yet upheld the protections of Section 230. This law has since faced numerous court challenges, validating its constitutionality. Click Here for Frequently Asked Questions About Process Servers!

Impact of Communications Decency Act 230

CDA 230 enables the flourishing of all internet bastions by protecting online intermediaries from litigation. This has allowed platforms like YouTube, Craigslist, Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter to host user-generated content without bearing responsibility for every individual infringement. It also extends protections to bloggers, allowing content to remain despite potentially objectionable contributions from readers or guest bloggers. Click here for information on How Rush Process Service Can Expedite Your Case.

Impact of Abrogating or Restricting Communications Decency Act 230

Without CDA 230, platforms would need to be more cautious with hosted content, potentially leading to over-moderation or avoidance of moderation altogether. Narrowing the scope of the ‘Good Samaritan’ clause could significantly impact the fight against hate speech and terrorism online.

Communications Decency Act 230: Changes Enacted

In recent years, efforts to amend or limit the protections afforded by CDA 230 have intensified. Notably, the Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship signed by President Trump in May 2020 aimed to narrow the safe-harbor protections. Moreover, the Department of Justice’s recommendations in June 2020 suggested various ways to amend CDA 230 to deal with illicit content and promote transparency and accountability.

Communications Decency Act 230 and the First Amendment

CDA 230 provides more immunity than First Amendment defenses, immunizing claims against internet services based on third-party content. This statute is significant for its protection of private parties and commercial speech, offering a broader shield than the First Amendment alone.


Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has played a fundamental role in shaping the modern Internet. It has allowed for the growth and development of a vast array of online services by providing crucial protections for platforms hosting third-party content. Despite challenges and calls for reform, its core principles remain vital to preserving the open and dynamic nature of the Internet.


New York: (212) 203-8001 – 590 Madison Avenue, 21st Floor, New York, New York 10022
Brooklyn: (347) 983-5436 – 300 Cadman Plaza West, 12th Floor, Brooklyn, New York 11201
Queens: (646) 357-3005 – 118-35 Queens Blvd, Suite 400, Forest Hills, New York 11375
Long Island: (516) 208-4577 – 626 RXR Plaza, 6th Floor, Uniondale, New York 11556
Westchester: (914) 414-0877 – 50 Main Street, 10th Floor, White Plains, New York 10606
Connecticut: (203) 489-2940 – 500 West Putnam Avenue, Suite 400, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
New Jersey: (201) 630-0114 – 101 Hudson Street, 21 Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey 07302
Washington DC: (202) 655-4450 – 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 300, Washington DC 20004


Pick up the phone and call Toll-Free (800) 774-6922 or click the service you want to purchase. Our dedicated team of professionals is ready to help you out. We can handle all your process service needs;  For information on, What is a Process Server, Click Here!

Please feel free to contact us for more information about our process-serving agency. We are ready to provide service of process to all our clients globally from our offices in New York, Brooklyn, Queens, Long Island, Westchester, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Washington, D.C.

“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives” – Foster, William A


The information contained herein has been prepared in compliance with Section 107 of the Copyright Act. Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works. The articles/Images contained herein serve as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, educational, and research-as examples of activities that qualify as fair use. Undisputed Legal Inc. is a Process Service Agency and “Not A Law Firm” therefore the articles/images contained herein are for educational purposes only, and not intended as legal advice.