Rules for Service of Process in Westchester County NY

Last Updated: January 13, 2026

Service of Process in Westchester County NY is governed by a defined body of statutory authority and judicially enforced rules that determine whether courts may lawfully exercise jurisdiction over a party. These rules are not procedural formalities; they are jurisdiction-critical requirements that directly affect the validity of proceedings, the enforceability of orders, and the preservation of due-process rights. When service fails to comply with governing rules, Westchester courts lack authority to proceed—regardless of the merits of the underlying case.

Westchester County courts apply statewide CPLR provisions through a local judicial lens, evaluating whether service complies not only with statutory text but with constitutional notice standards and evidentiary reliability. Judges routinely scrutinize who served the papers, whether the method used was legally authorized, whether timing and location were reasonable, and whether proof of service can withstand challenge. As a result, understanding the rules that govern service of process in Westchester County NY is essential for attorneys, litigants, and institutions seeking legally durable outcomes.

This article serves as a comprehensive rules-based resource for the legal community. It explains the governing statutes and authority, who may lawfully serve process, permissible methods of service at a high level, proof requirements, judicial review standards, and the consequences of non-compliance across Westchester courts. It is not a step-by-step execution guide; rather, it is a court-focused analysis of the rules and expectations that determine whether service of process will be upheld under Westchester County scrutiny.

WESTCHESTER PROCESS SERVICE PRICING & OPTIONS

ROUTINE — $100 (First attempt within 3–7 business days)
RUSH — $200 (First attempt within 24–48 business hours)
SAME-DAY — $250 (First attempt the same business day when documents are received during normal business hours)
EMAIL/MAIL — $75 (Where permitted; completed within 24–48 business hours from time of receipt)
STAKE-OUT — $325 (Includes 1 hour waiting time; each additional hour $100)

Includes 3 attempts (morning/afternoon/evening) + notarized Affidavit of Service/Due Diligence.
Additional individuals: 50% off (same address/same order).
Place Order Online | Call (800) 774-6922 Now

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The structure of this article reflects how Westchester County courts analyze compliance with service rules, moving from governing authority to judicial review and consequences. Each section is designed to clarify the legal requirements that determine whether service of process will be upheld.

• Westchester Process Service Pricing & Options
• How Process Service Works For Various Legal Documents (Video)
• Governing Statutes and Authority
• Who Is Authorized to Serve Process in Westchester County
• County and Municipal Licensing Considerations
• Legally Authorized Methods of Service (High-Level Rules)
• Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions
• Proof of Service Requirements in Westchester County
• Judicial Review and Challenges to Service
• Consequences of Non-Compliance
• Application Across Westchester Courts
• Professional Expectations in Westchester Litigation
• Conclusion: Service Rules Are Jurisdiction-Critical
• Professional Credentials & Memberships
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Additional Resources: Westchester County Service of Process Law & Practice
• What Our Clients Are Saying (Reviews)
• Westchester County Process Service Updates
• For Assistance Serving Legal Papers
• Sources & Legal References
• Editorial Note On Use
• Directions To Our Westchester Office (Map)

Governing Statutes and Authority

The rules governing service of process in Westchester County NY are rooted in New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules, which establish the statutory foundation for how courts acquire personal jurisdiction and ensure compliance with due process. These statewide statutes apply uniformly in Westchester County and serve as the primary authority courts rely on when determining whether service is legally valid. Compliance with these provisions is mandatory; failure to adhere to them deprives the court of jurisdiction, regardless of actual notice.

CPLR § 308 is the central statute governing service upon natural persons, defining the legally authorized methods by which service may be effected. Westchester courts interpret this statute in conjunction with constitutional notice principles, assessing whether the method used was reasonably calculated to apprise the defendant of the action. Where alternative or substituted methods are employed, courts examine whether statutory prerequisites were satisfied before those methods were invoked.

Additional CPLR provisions govern the consequences of defective service and the remedies available when notice is lacking. Statutes addressing vacatur and relief from judgment empower Westchester courts to dismiss actions or set aside orders where service fails to comply with statutory or constitutional requirements. Together, these statutes form the authoritative framework that controls whether service of process in Westchester County NY will withstand judicial scrutiny

Who Is Authorized to Serve Process in Westchester County

Who performs service of process is a threshold legal issue in determining whether service is valid in Westchester County. Courts examine not only how service was carried out, but whether the individual who performed service was legally authorized to do so at the time service occurred. Service executed by an unauthorized person is jurisdictionally defective, regardless of whether the papers were delivered or received.

Under New York law, service of process generally must be performed by a person who is not a party to the action and who meets statutory eligibility requirements. Westchester courts assess authorization by reference to the CPLR and applicable statewide rules governing who may lawfully serve process. When service is challenged, courts may scrutinize the server’s status, role in the litigation, and compliance with eligibility restrictions to determine whether service was legally permissible.

Authorization also intersects with credibility and evidentiary reliability. Courts evaluate whether the individual serving process is capable of providing a sworn affidavit that satisfies evidentiary standards and supports the presumption of valid service. In Westchester County, service performed by properly authorized individuals is a foundational requirement that supports jurisdiction, proof integrity, and judicial confidence in the service record.

County and Municipal Licensing Considerations

Licensing considerations are an important—but often misunderstood—component of service of process in Westchester County NY. Unlike New York City, which maintains a municipal licensing and regulatory regime for process servers, Westchester County does not impose a separate countywide licensing system for service of process. Courts in Westchester therefore evaluate authorization and compliance primarily through state statutory eligibility, not local licensing status.

That distinction matters in contested service proceedings. Westchester courts focus on whether the individual who served process met the requirements imposed by the CPLR and related statewide authority, rather than whether the server held a municipal license. Attempts to import New York City–specific licensing rules into Westchester cases are routinely rejected, as those regulations do not apply outside the five boroughs.

However, the absence of a county licensing regime does not reduce judicial scrutiny. Westchester judges still expect service to be performed by qualified, neutral individuals and supported by reliable affidavits. While municipal licensing is not a prerequisite in Westchester County, courts continue to evaluate service through the lenses of statutory authority, due process, and evidentiary credibility, making compliance with statewide rules essential.

Legally Authorized Methods of Service (High-Level Rules)

The rules governing service of process in Westchester County NY authorize specific methods of service, each defined by statute and subject to judicial interpretation. Courts do not evaluate service based on preference or convenience; they assess whether the method used was explicitly permitted by law and applied in a manner consistent with due-process principles. Use of an unauthorized method, or misuse of an authorized one, renders service jurisdictionally defective.

Offering statutes permit multiple methods of service, but Westchester courts emphasize that these methods are not interchangeable. Certain methods are favored because they provide the strongest assurance of notice, while others are permitted only when statutory conditions are met. Judges examine whether the chosen method aligned with the circumstances presented and whether prerequisites for that method were satisfied before it was employed.

Importantly, Westchester courts analyze authorized methods through a reasonableness lens. Even when a method is legally available, courts consider whether its use was reasonably calculated to apprise the defendant of the action. This high-level rules-based approach reinforces that lawful service in Westchester depends not only on selecting an authorized method, but on applying it in a way that satisfies statutory intent and constitutional notice requirements.

Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions

Rules governing service of process in Westchester County NY extend beyond the method of service to include restrictions on when, where, and how service may be performed. These limitations are grounded in due-process principles and are intended to ensure that service efforts are reasonable, non-abusive, and likely to provide meaningful notice. Courts examine these factors closely when service is challenged.

Westchester courts assess timing to determine whether service occurred at a reasonable hour and under circumstances consistent with lawful notice. Service attempts made at inappropriate times or in a manner that appears coercive or harassing may raise judicial concerns, even if the method itself is statutorily authorized. Judges consider whether the timing of service aligns with accepted standards of fairness and procedural integrity.

Place and manner are equally significant. Courts evaluate whether service occurred at a location reasonably associated with the defendant and whether the manner of service respected legal boundaries and personal rights. In Westchester County, service that disregards contextual realities—such as access limitations or residential norms—may be viewed as unreliable or unreasonable. Together, time, place, and manner restrictions reinforce that valid service is measured not only by statutory compliance, but by adherence to constitutional expectations of fairness and notice.

Proof of Service Requirements in Westchester County

Proof of service is a central evidentiary requirement in establishing valid service of process in Westchester County NY, as courts rely on this proof to determine whether jurisdiction has been properly obtained. Westchester courts treat proof of service as sworn evidence, not a procedural formality, and evaluate it with the same care applied to other jurisdictional submissions. Deficiencies in proof can undermine otherwise lawful service.

Courts expect proof of service to be presented through a properly executed affidavit of service that accurately reflects how, when, and where service occurred. Judges review affidavits for specificity, internal consistency, and plausibility, particularly when service is disputed. Conclusory statements or omissions may weaken the presumption of valid service and invite further judicial inquiry.

In contested matters, proof of service often becomes the focal point of judicial review. Westchester courts may compare affidavits against surrounding facts, filings, or sworn denials to assess credibility. Where proof is clear, detailed, and reliable, courts are more likely to uphold service. Where proof is vague or inconsistent, courts may require additional evidence, order re-service, or deny jurisdictional relief, underscoring the critical role proof plays in service compliance.

Judicial Review and Challenges to Service

When service is challenged, Westchester County courts conduct a focused judicial review to determine whether service of process complied with statutory requirements and constitutional due-process standards. Courts do not simply confirm that an affidavit was filed; they evaluate whether the service record as a whole demonstrates that notice was reasonably calculated to reach the defendant. This review is often decisive in determining whether a case may proceed.

Judges examine affidavits of service alongside sworn denials, contextual facts, and any inconsistencies in the record. In Westchester, a properly executed affidavit creates a rebuttable presumption of valid service, but that presumption can be overcome where credibility is questioned or statutory prerequisites appear unmet. Courts assess whether the service narrative is plausible, internally consistent, and supported by surrounding circumstances.

Service challenges in Westchester frequently arise in the context of motions to dismiss, motions to vacate, or jurisdictional objections raised early in the proceeding. Courts may resolve these challenges on the papers or, where factual disputes exist, order evidentiary hearings to assess credibility. This judicial review process underscores that compliance with service rules is not theoretical; it is subject to direct and searching court scrutiny that can determine the outcome of the case.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Failure to comply with the rules governing service of process in Westchester County NY carries serious and often irreversible consequences. Because proper service is a prerequisite to jurisdiction, non-compliance deprives the court of authority to act, regardless of the underlying claims. Westchester courts consistently enforce these rules to preserve due process and procedural integrity.

When service rules are violated, courts may dismiss actions, deny requested relief, or vacate orders entered without jurisdiction. Even minor defects can be outcome-determinative if they affect notice or statutory compliance. In Westchester, courts prioritize strict adherence to service requirements over considerations of efficiency or convenience, particularly when a defendant raises timely objections.

The consequences of defective service also extend beyond a single ruling. Improper service can delay litigation, increase costs, and force parties to restart proceedings after significant time has passed. For legal professionals and litigants in Westchester County, understanding and complying with service rules is essential to avoiding procedural failures that undermine otherwise valid cases.

Application Across Westchester Courts

The rules governing service of process in Westchester County NY apply across multiple court venues, but their application may vary depending on the court’s jurisdiction and procedural posture. Westchester Supreme Court, County Court, Family Court, and local City Courts each rely on the same statutory framework, yet judges within these venues may emphasize different aspects of service compliance based on the nature of the proceeding and the relief sought.

In Supreme Court and County Court matters, service is often scrutinized at the outset of litigation, particularly where jurisdiction is contested or default relief is sought. Courts in these venues expect strict compliance with service rules and closely examine affidavits of service when motions challenge notice or authority. Service defects in these courts frequently lead to dismissal or vacatur, underscoring the importance of accurate proof.

Family Court proceedings in Westchester involve heightened sensitivity to due-process considerations, especially in cases affecting custody, support, or personal rights. While the governing rules remain statutory, judges may apply enhanced scrutiny to ensure meaningful notice. Across all Westchester courts, consistent application of service rules reinforces that jurisdiction hinges on lawful service, regardless of venue.

Professional Expectations in Westchester Litigation

In Westchester County litigation, compliance with service of process rules is viewed as a core professional obligation rather than a technical task. Courts expect attorneys, litigants, and service professionals to treat service as sworn, jurisdiction-creating evidence, not as a procedural checkbox. This expectation shapes how judges assess credibility, diligence, and overall compliance when service is reviewed.

Westchester judges routinely evaluate whether service reflects professional judgment and respect for due-process standards. Service records that demonstrate care, accuracy, and contextual awareness tend to reinforce judicial confidence, while careless or conclusory submissions may invite skepticism. Courts expect practitioners to anticipate scrutiny and to ensure that service efforts and proof can withstand challenge if questioned later in the case.

These professional expectations extend beyond initial filings. Service may be challenged months or even years into litigation, and Westchester courts expect the service record to remain defensible over time. Treating service as an integral part of litigation strategy—grounded in compliance, documentation integrity, and awareness of court standards—helps preserve jurisdiction and supports the orderly administration of justice in Westchester County.

Professional Expectations in Westchester Litigation

In Westchester County litigation, compliance with service of process rules is viewed as a core professional obligation rather than a technical task. Courts expect attorneys, litigants, and service professionals to treat service as sworn, jurisdiction-creating evidence, not as a procedural checkbox. This expectation shapes how judges assess credibility, diligence, and overall compliance when service is reviewed.

Westchester judges routinely evaluate whether service reflects professional judgment and respect for due-process standards. Service records that demonstrate care, accuracy, and contextual awareness tend to reinforce judicial confidence, while careless or conclusory submissions may invite skepticism. Courts expect practitioners to anticipate scrutiny and to ensure that service efforts and proof can withstand challenge if questioned later in the case.

These professional expectations extend beyond initial filings. Service may be challenged months or even years into litigation, and Westchester courts expect the service record to remain defensible over time. Treating service as an integral part of litigation strategy—grounded in compliance, documentation integrity, and awareness of court standards—helps preserve jurisdiction and supports the orderly administration of justice in Westchester County.

Conclusion: Service Rules Are Jurisdiction-Critical

The rules governing service of process in Westchester County NY are not ancillary procedural requirements—they are the legal gateway through which courts acquire authority to act. Every stage of litigation depends on proper service, from the commencement of an action to the enforceability of judgments and orders. When service complies with governing statutes and judicial expectations, courts may proceed with confidence; when it does not, jurisdiction fails.

Westchester courts consistently emphasize that valid service is inseparable from due process. Compliance is measured not only by adherence to statutory text, but by whether service was reasonably calculated to provide notice and supported by credible proof. Judges evaluate service through a rigorous lens, recognizing that defective service undermines fairness, delays justice, and erodes confidence in the legal process.

For legal professionals and institutions operating in Westchester County, understanding and respecting service rules is essential to protecting litigation outcomes. Treating service of process as a jurisdiction-critical function—grounded in statutory authority, evidentiary integrity, and professional responsibility—ensures that cases are decided on their merits rather than lost to avoidable procedural failure.

PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS & MEMBERSHIPS

Undisputed Legal Inc. maintains active participation in nationally recognized legal, compliance, and professional organizations, reflecting a sustained commitment to regulatory awareness, professional standards, and court-reliable service execution in Westchester County and throughout New York.

Our credentials and affiliations include:

• Better Business Bureau — Accredited Business (since 2014)
• National Association of Professional Process Servers (NAPPS)
• New York State Professional Process Server Association

Additional Professional Memberships:

Mississippi Association of Professional Process Servers
Arizona Process Servers Association
Mid-Atlantic Association of Professional Process Servers
California Association of Legal Professionals
Colorado Process Servers Association
North Carolina Association of Professional Process Servers
Oregon Association of Process Servers
Westchester Bar Association
New Jersey State Bar Association
Mortgage Bankers Association
American Legal and Financial Network
National Creditors Bar Association
National Notary Association

Undisputed Legal Inc. has also been recognized as “Best in New York” consecutively since 2015, reflecting consistent performance across high-volume, time-sensitive, and contested service matters.

These memberships support ongoing professional education, regulatory compliance, and adherence to established best practices—helping ensure that service of process in Westchester County NY is executed in a manner that is lawful, properly documented, and defensible under Westchester County court scrutiny.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

The following questions address how service of process in Westchester County NY is evaluated by courts when compliance, jurisdiction, and due process are placed at issue. These answers focus on legal standards and judicial consequences rather than procedural execution.

Why are service of process rules treated as jurisdictional in Westchester County?
Westchester courts treat service rules as jurisdictional because proper service is the mechanism by which the court acquires authority over a party. Without valid service, the court lacks power to issue binding orders or judgments. Even where a defendant has actual knowledge of a case, courts require strict compliance with statutory service rules to satisfy due-process requirements.

Which laws govern service of process in Westchester County NY?
Service of process in Westchester County is governed primarily by New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules, including CPLR § 308 and related provisions. These statutes apply statewide, but Westchester courts interpret and enforce them through local judicial practice and case-specific scrutiny. Appellate authority from the Second Department further guides how these rules are applied.

Who determines whether service complied with the rules in Westchester?
Ultimately, compliance is determined by the court where the action is pending. Judges review affidavits of service, supporting records, and any sworn denials to assess whether service met statutory and constitutional standards. When factual disputes arise, courts may conduct evidentiary hearings to resolve credibility issues.

What role does proof of service play in Westchester proceedings?
Proof of service functions as sworn evidence establishing how and when service occurred. Westchester courts rely heavily on affidavits of service to determine jurisdiction and notice. Deficient or conclusory proof can undermine the presumption of valid service and lead to dismissal, vacatur, or re-service orders.

What happens if service of process rules are violated in Westchester County?
Violations of service rules can result in dismissal of the action, denial of requested relief, or vacatur of orders entered without jurisdiction. These consequences apply regardless of the merits of the underlying claims. In Westchester County, strict enforcement of service rules reflects the courts’ commitment to due process and procedural integrity.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: WESTCHESTER COUNTY SERVICE OF PROCESS LAW & PRACTICE

The following resources support a deeper understanding of service of process in Westchester County NY, reinforcing statutory compliance, judicial scrutiny, and venue-specific considerations. These articles are selected to strengthen the Westchester cluster and support the primary authority page without duplicating rule analysis or procedural execution covered elsewhere.

FOUNDATIONAL WESTCHESTER PROCESS SERVICE AUTHORITY

• Westchester County New York Process Service
• Westchester County NY Process Service: What You Need To Know

LEGAL FRAMEWORK & RULES ANALYSIS

• The Legal Framework For Process Serving In Westchester County
• Navigating Process Serving Rules In Westchester County, NY

SCENARIO & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

• Process Serving In Westchester Commercial Hubs
• Serving Legal Papers In Westchester, NY Gated Communities
• Serving Legal Papers To Evasive Defendants In Westchester N.Y.

DOCUMENT-TYPE SERVICE CONTEXT

• Serving Divorce Papers in Westchester County, New York
• Serving Subpoenas To Medical Facilities In Westchester New York

DELIVERY VS. SERVICE DISTINCTIONS

• Legal Document Delivery In Westchester County New York Guide

WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING

WESTCHESTER COUNTY PROCESS SERVICE UPDATES

To stay informed about our latest developments in Westchester County related to Westchester County New York process service and legal services, we encourage you to visit our Blog, Videos and Google My Business page. Our GMB page is an invaluable resource, offering timely information and the latest articles to ensure you have access to the most relevant updates. Connect with us directly here to stay well-informed about process service in Westchester County, New York.

FOR ASSISTANCE SERVING LEGAL PAPERS

Click the “Place Order” button at the top of this page or call us at (800) 774-6922 to begin. Our team of experienced process servers is ready to assist you with reliable and efficient service of your documents, ensuring compliance with all legal requirements. We offer both comprehensive support and à la carte services tailored to your specific needs:

• Prompt and professional service of process
• Accurate completion of affidavits of service
• Rush service for time-sensitive matters
• Skip tracing for hard-to-locate parties
• Detailed reporting on service attempts

Don’t risk case delays or dismissals due to improper service. Let Undisputed Legal’s skilled team handle the important task of serving legal papers for you. Our diligent, professional service helps attorneys, pro se litigants, and parents ensure their papers are served correctly and on time.

Take the first step towards ensuring proper service in your case – click “Place Order” or call (800) 774-6922 now. Let Undisputed Legal be your trusted partner in navigating the critical process of serving your documents.

“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives” – Foster, William A

SOURCES & LEGAL REFERENCES

This section anchors the article’s rules-based and jurisdictional analysis of service of process in Westchester County NY to primary authority governing how service is authorized, evaluated, and enforced by Westchester courts. The references are organized to reflect how legal stakeholders analyze service compliance: (1) statewide statutory authority establishing service requirements and jurisdiction; (2) controlling appellate standards—primarily from the Second Department—on affidavits of service, presumptions of validity, and due-process sufficiency; and (3) statewide practice and court administration materials relevant to proof and review of service in Westchester County.

These sources are provided to support legal analysis, compliance review, and risk assessment without reliance on secondary summaries or procedural instruction.

A) NEW YORK STATUTES (STATEWIDE) — SERVICE OF PROCESS AND JURISDICTION

CPLR § 308 — Personal service upon a natural person
Establishes the primary statutory framework governing service of process in New York and defines how courts, including those in Westchester County, acquire personal jurisdiction through lawful service.
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CVP/308 (New York State Senate)

CPLR § 317 — Relief from judgment where service was improper or notice was lacking
Provides post-judgment relief where lack of notice is demonstrated, underscoring the jurisdictional importance of compliant service in Westchester proceedings.
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CVP/317 (New York State Senate)

CPLR § 5015(a) — Vacatur of judgments and orders
Authorizes courts to vacate judgments or orders based on jurisdictional defects and improper service, reinforcing the consequences of non-compliance with service rules.
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CVP/5015 (New York State Senate)

Statutory mirrors for research and citation (non-official):
CPLR § 308 (Justia): https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/cvp/article-3/308/
CPLR § 317 (Justia): https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/cvp/article-3/317/
CPLR § 5015 (Justia): https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/cvp/article-50/5015/

B) CORE NEW YORK CASE LAW — SERVICE RULE COMPLIANCE & CREDIBILITY (SECOND DEPARTMENT)

Matter of Dunleavy v. Moya, 237 A.D.2d 176 (2d Dep’t 1997)
Second Department authority establishing the rebuttable presumption of proper service created by an affidavit of service—binding precedent for Westchester County courts.
https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-second-department/1997/237-ad2d-176.html

Bankers Trust Co. of Cal. v. Tsoukas, 303 A.D.2d 343 (2d Dep’t 2003)
Addresses sworn denials of service and the evidentiary standards courts apply when service credibility is challenged within the Second Department.
https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-second-department/2003/2003-01741.html

Feinstein v. Bergner, 48 N.Y.2d 234 (Ct App 1979)
Court of Appeals authority emphasizing due-process requirements and the constitutional standard that service be reasonably calculated to provide notice—frequently cited in jurisdictional disputes statewide, including Westchester County.
https://nycourts.gov/reporter/archives/feinstein_bergner.htm

C) PRACTICE & COURT ADMINISTRATION CONTEXT — PROOF AND REVIEW OF SERVICE

New York Unified Court System — E-Filing and Practice Guidance
Statewide administrative materials relevant to filing affidavits of service and reviewing proof of service in Westchester County courts.
https://nycourts.gov/efiling/

Second Department Appellate Practice Standards
Appellate authority governing review of service-of-process compliance, affidavit sufficiency, and jurisdictional challenges for Westchester County matters.

EDITORIAL NOTE ON USE

This article focuses on the rules, authority, and judicial evaluation governing service of process in Westchester County NY. The authorities cited above illustrate how courts assess statutory compliance, affidavit credibility, and due-process sufficiency. They are provided to support legal analysis and compliance assessment—not to offer step-by-step service execution guidance.

Directions to Our Westchester Office

For access to our Westchester Office at 50 Main Street, 10th Floor, White Plains, New York, please click the embedded map and call ahead to be added to building security. Be sure to bring all necessary documents and payment to expedite your visit. Undisputed Legal Inc. maintains offices in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Texas, Illinois, and Washington, D.C. We provide legal support services in all 50 states and over 120 countries worldwide.