COMPLETE BREAKDOWN OF THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION ARTICLES

The Hague Service Convention, formally known as the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, is a multilateral treaty that simplifies the process of serving legal documents across international borders. Ratified in 1967, the Convention aims to establish a uniform framework for effective service of process while ensuring that defendants’ rights are protected. This article provides a comprehensive breakdown of the Hague Service Convention articles, explaining the purpose and implications of each provision. Click here for information on How To Serve Legal Papers Internationally.

Chapter I: Judicial Documents

Article 1:

Scope Article 1 establishes the scope of the Hague Service Convention, stating that it applies whenever there is an occasion to transmit a judicial or extrajudicial document for service abroad. This provision makes it clear that the Convention is the primary means of service for countries that have ratified it, rather than merely a supplementary method.

Article 2:

Central Authority Under Article 2, each signatory state must designate a Central Authority responsible for receiving and processing requests for service from other contracting states. The Central Authority acts as an intermediary, ensuring that requests are in the proper form and forwarding them to the appropriate agency for service. This centralized system streamlines the process and provides a clear point of contact for international service of process.

Article 3:

Forwarding Authority Article 3 specifies who may forward service requests to the Central Authority of the receiving state. In general, requests must come from a judicial officer or other authority competent under the law of the originating state. This provision helps ensure the legitimacy of service requests and prevents abuse of the system.

Article 4:

Objections to Service If the Central Authority determines that a request does not comply with the Convention’s provisions, Article 4 requires it to promptly inform the applicant and specify its objections. This allows the applicant to correct any deficiencies and resubmit the request, minimizing delays in the service process.

Article 5:

Methods of Service Article 5 outlines the methods by which the Central Authority may serve documents. The default method is service according to the internal law of the receiving state. However, the applicant may request a specific method, provided it is compatible with the law of the receiving state. This flexibility allows for the accommodation of different legal systems and traditions.

Article 6:

Certificate of Service After service has been completed, Article 6 requires the Central Authority to provide a certificate confirming the details of service, such as the method, place, and date of service, and the person to whom the document was delivered. If service is unsuccessful, the certificate must state the reasons for the failure. This documentation is crucial for establishing the validity of service and protecting the rights of the parties involved.

Article 7:

Translation Requirements Article 7 addresses the language requirements for documents served under the Convention. Standard terms in the model form annexed to the Convention must be written in either French or English, and the corresponding blanks must be completed in the language of the receiving state, French, or English. This provision helps ensure that the documents are understandable to the recipient and the authorities handling the request. Click here for information on How To Overcome Language Barriers In Process Service.

Chapter II: Extrajudicial Documents

Article 17:

Application to Extrajudicial Documents Article 17 extends the Convention’s provisions to extrajudicial documents, which are documents not directly related to a judicial proceeding, such as notices or demands. This ensures that a wide range of legal documents can be served effectively across borders.

Chapter III: General Clauses

Article 8:

Service by Diplomatic or Consular Agents Article 8 allows contracting states to use their diplomatic or consular agents to serve documents on persons abroad, provided the receiving state does not object. This method of service can be particularly useful in cases involving nationals of the originating state residing in the receiving state.

Article 9:

Service by Forwarding to Designated Authorities Under Article 9, contracting states may use consular channels to forward documents to authorities designated by the receiving state for service. This alternative method can provide additional flexibility and efficiency in the service process.

Article 10:

Alternative Methods of Service Article 10 is one of the most debated provisions of the Hague Service Convention. It allows for three additional methods of service: [A.] sending documents directly to persons abroad by postal channels, [B.] using judicial officers, officials, or other competent persons of the originating state to effect service directly through their counterparts in the receiving state, and [C.] allowing any person interested in a judicial proceeding to effect service directly through judicial officers, officials, or other competent persons of the receiving state.

The controversy surrounding Article 10(a) centers on whether the term “send” is equivalent to “serve,” and thus, whether the provision authorizes service by mail. The interpretation of this article varies among contracting states, with some permitting service by mail and others objecting to it.

Article 11:

Direct Communication Between Authorities Article 11 allows contracting states to agree on additional methods of service beyond those provided in the Convention, such as direct communication between their respective authorities. This flexibility enables states to tailor the service process to their specific needs and bilateral relationships.

Article 12:

Costs of Service Article 12 addresses the costs associated with service under the Convention. In general, the receiving state cannot charge any fees for its services. However, the applicant must pay or reimburse the costs incurred for the employment of a judicial officer or other competent person under the law of the receiving state, or for using a particular method of service.

Article 13:

Grounds for Refusal Under Article 13, a contracting state may refuse to comply with a request for service only if it deems that compliance would infringe upon its sovereignty or security. This provision ensures that the Convention does not undermine the fundamental rights and interests of the receiving state.

Article 14:

Diplomatic or Consular Channels for Transmission Article 14 provides for the use of diplomatic or consular channels to forward documents for service in cases where exceptional circumstances require such transmission. This alternative method may be used when other means of service have failed or are deemed inappropriate.

Article 15:

Protection Against Default Judgments Article 15 safeguards defendants’ rights by providing protection against default judgments. A judge may not enter a default judgment unless it is established that the document was served by a method prescribed by the receiving state’s internal law or that the document was actually delivered to the defendant or their residence. This provision ensures that defendants have adequate notice and opportunity to respond to legal proceedings.

Article 16:

Relief from Expiration of Time Limits In cases where a default judgment has been entered against a defendant who did not receive timely notice, Article 16 allows the court to grant relief from the effects of the expiration of the time for appeal. This provision helps protect defendants’ rights and ensures that they have an opportunity to present their case.

Article 19:

Compatibility with Internal Law Article 19 clarifies that the Convention does not prevent contracting states from using methods of service permitted by their internal law. This provision ensures that the Convention does not restrict the use of alternative methods that may be more efficient or effective in certain situations.

Article 20:

Agreements Between Contracting States Under Article 20, contracting states may enter into agreements to further simplify or expedite the service process, such as dispensing with the requirement for duplicate copies of documents, translation requirements, or the need for a summary of the document.

Conclusion

The Hague Service Convention plays a vital role in facilitating the service of legal documents across international borders. By establishing a uniform framework and providing clear guidelines for the transmission and execution of service requests, the Convention streamlines the process and ensures that the rights of all parties involved are protected.

Understanding the key provisions of the Hague Service Convention is essential for legal professionals and anyone involved in cross-border litigation. By familiarizing themselves with the articles outlined in this breakdown, readers can navigate the complexities of international service of process more effectively and efficiently.

As globalization continues to increase the frequency of cross-border legal matters, the importance of the Hague Service Convention will only continue to grow. By adhering to its provisions and working within its framework, parties can ensure that legal documents are served properly and that proceedings move forward smoothly, promoting the fair and efficient administration of justice on a global scale.

Frequently Asked Questions

[H3] What is the Hague Service Convention? The Hague Service Convention is an international treaty that streamlines the process of serving legal documents across borders in civil and commercial matters. It provides a uniform framework for transmitting and executing service requests between contracting states.

How many countries have ratified the Hague Service Convention?

As of 2023, 79 countries have ratified the Hague Service Convention, including the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and many European Union member states.

What is the role of the Central Authority under the Hague Service Convention?

Each contracting state must designate a Central Authority responsible for receiving and processing requests for service from other contracting states. The Central Authority acts as an intermediary, ensuring that requests are in the proper form and forwarding them to the appropriate agency for service.

Can I use alternative methods of service under the Hague Service Convention?

Yes, the Convention allows for alternative methods of service, such as service by diplomatic or consular agents (Article 8), service by forwarding to designated authorities (Article 9), and service by postal channels or direct communication between judicial officers (Article 10). However, contracting states may object to these alternative methods.

How long does it take to serve documents under the Hague Service Convention?

The time required for service under the Convention varies depending on the countries involved and the specific circumstances of the case. In general, the process can take several months, so it is essential to initiate service requests well in advance of any deadlines.

What happens if a defendant is not properly served under the Hague Service Convention?

The Convention provides safeguards against default judgments in cases where defendants have not been properly served. Under Article 15, a judge may not enter a default judgment unless it is established that the document was served by a method prescribed by the receiving state’s internal law or that the document was actually delivered to the defendant or their residence.

Can I recover the costs of service under the Hague Service Convention?

In general, the receiving state cannot charge any fees for its services under the Convention. However, the applicant may be required to pay or reimburse the costs incurred for the employment of a judicial officer or other competent person, or for using a particular method of service (Article 12).

What language must documents be in for service under the Hague Service Convention?

Standard terms in the model form annexed to the Convention must be written in either French or English, and the corresponding blanks must be completed in the language of the receiving state, French, or English (Article 7). Some countries may also require translations of the documents being served.

Can a contracting state refuse to comply with a request for service under the Hague Service Convention?

A contracting state may refuse to comply with a request for service only if it deems that compliance would infringe upon its sovereignty or security (Article 13). This provision ensures that the Convention does not undermine the fundamental rights and interests of the receiving state.

How does the Hague Service Convention protect the rights of defendants?

The Convention includes several provisions designed to protect the rights of defendants, such as the requirement for proper service (Article 15), the opportunity for relief from default judgments (Article 16), and the prohibition on charging fees for services rendered by the receiving state (Article 12). These safeguards help ensure that defendants have adequate notice and opportunity to respond to legal proceedings.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

• Complete Breakdown Of The Hague Service Convention Articles
• Hague Service Convention: Streamlining International Legal Procedures
• How The Hague Convention Simplifies International Process Service
• Corporate Process Service: International Service of Process Guide
• How To Overcome Language Barriers in Process Service
• How To Navigate The Complexities of International Process Service
• How To Master International Process Service: Cross-Cultural Communication
• Understanding Alternate Methods of International Process Service
• International Service of Process: Expert Guide For Global Legal Success

FOR ASSISTANCE SERVING LEGAL PAPERS

Click the “Place Order” button at the top of this page or call us at (800) 774-6922 to begin. Our team of experienced process servers is prepared to assist with reliable and efficient service of legal documents, ensuring compliance with all regulatory requirements. We offer both comprehensive support and à la carte services tailored to meet your corporate needs:

• Prompt and professional service of international legal documents
• Accurate completion and documentation of affidavits of service
• Rush service for time-sensitive international matters
• Skip tracing for hard-to-locate individuals or entities
• Detailed reporting on service attempts

Avoid delays or potential legal setbacks due to improper service. Trust Undisputed Legal’s skilled team to handle the critical task of international process service on your behalf. Our diligent, professional service supports attorneys, corporations, and business entities in ensuring that legal documents are served accurately and on time.

Take the first step toward reliable international process service – click “Place Order” or call (800) 774-6922 now. Let Undisputed Legal be your trusted partner in managing the vital process of serving international documents.

“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives” – Foster, William A

Sources

1. Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, opened for signature November 15, 1965, 20 U.S.T. 361, T.I.A.S. No. 6638,658 U.N.T.S. 163 [hereinafter the Hague Service Convention]

2.Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk, 486 U.S. 694, 698 (1988).

3. Article 2: Each Contracting State shall designate a Central Authority which will undertake to receive requests for service coming from the other Contracting States and proceed in conformity with the provisions of Articles 3 to 6.

Each State shall organize the Central Authority in conformity with its own law.

4. Article 4: If the Central Authority considers that the request does not comply with the province, ConveConvention’s provisions shall promptly inform the applicant and specify its objections to the request. 

5. Article 3: The authority or judicial officer competent under the law of the State in which the documents originate shall forward to the Central Authority of the State addressed a request conforming to the model annexed to the present Convention, without any requirement of legalization or other equivalent formality.

The document to be served or a copy thereof shall be annexed to the request. The request and the document shall both be furnished in duplicate.

6.e-Vision.nl TN, “United States of America – Central Authority & Practical Information” <https://www.hcch.net/en/states/authorities/details3/?aid=279> accessed October 9, 2020

7. Article 5:  The Central Authority of the State addressed shall itself serve the document or shall arrange to have it served by an appropriate agency, either –(a)by a method prescribed by its internal law for the service of documents in domestic actions upon persons who are within its territory, or b)by a particular method requested by the applicant, unless such a method is incompatible with the law of the State addressed.

8. Article 7The standard terms in the model annexed to the present Convention shall, in all cases, be written either in French or in English. They may also be written in the official language, or in one of the official languages, of the State in which the documents originate.  The corresponding blanks shall be completed either in the language of the State addressed or in French or English.

9. before using one particular alternative channel of transmission,  it should be ascertained that the  State of destination has not objected to it.  Declarations of the objection, if any, made by the Contracting States are available on the Service Section of the Hague Conference website at < www.hcch.net >.

10. Article 10: Provided the State of destination does not object, the present Convention shall not interfere with –a) the freedom to send judicial documents, by postal channels, directly to persons abroad, b) the freedom of judicial officers, officials, or other competent persons of the State of origin to effect service of judicial documents directly through the judicial officers, officials or other competent persons of the State of destination, c) the freedom of any person interested in a judicial proceeding to effect service of judicial documents directly through the judicial officers, officials or other competent persons of the State of destination

11.137 S. Ct. 1504 (2017).

12. At the HCCH special commission in April 1989, the Japanese Government submitted a comment stating that it “has not declared that it objects to the sending of judicial documents, by postal channels, directly to persons abroad See, See, practical handbook on the operation of the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on the service abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (Hague conference on private international law)(1983)

13.Ackermann v Levine 788 F.2d 830 (2d Cir. 1986).

14. Article 11: The present Convention shall not prevent two or more contracting States from agreeing to permit, for service of judicial documents, channels of transmission other than those provided for in the preceding articles and, in particular, direct communication between their respective authorities.

15. Article 12: The service of judicial documents coming from a Contracting State shall not give rise to any payment or reimbursement of taxes or costs for the services rendered by the State addressed. The applicant shall pay or reimburse the costs occasioned by — a)  the employment of a judicial officer or a person competent under the law of the State of destination, b)  the use of a particular method of service.

16. As provided by article 3(b)

17. Article 5: Subject to sub-paragraph (b) of the first paragraph of this Article, the document may always be served by delivery to an addressee who accepts it voluntarily. If the document is to be served under the first paragraph above, the Central Authority may require the document to be written in, or translated into, the official language or one of the official languages of the State addressed.  That part of the request, in the form attached to the present Convention, which contains a summary of the document to be served, shall be served with the document