How to Serve Legal Papers on a Homeless Defendant in New York

Serving legal papers on a homeless defendant in New York requires strict compliance with CPLR §308 and General Business Law §89-CC. When a defendant has no fixed address, process servers must show due diligence by attempting service at known locations such as shelters, prior residences, or community centers. If personal or substituted service is impossible, the court may authorize alternate service methods under CPLR §308(5), including service by publication, email, or social media. Every attempt must be carefully documented, and affidavits must detail when, where, and how service was attempted to ensure proof of lawful notice.

Key Steps to Serve Legal Papers on a Homeless Defendant in New York:

• Investigate all known locations: Check shelters, hospitals, outreach centers, or previous addresses.
• Record every service attempt: Include date, time, and location for each effort.
• Use skip tracing: Leverage public databases and digital searches to find contact leads.
• File a motion for alternate service: Request court permission under CPLR §308(5) with supporting affidavit.
• Maintain affidavit accuracy: Outline all prior attempts and approved alternate service details.
• Work with licensed professionals: Choose a qualified process server, such as Undisputed Legal, experienced in lawful service for transient defendants.

PROCESS SERVICE PRICING & OPTIONS

We serve all papers in all 50 states. Fees are automatically calculated at checkout based on the service address.

ROUTINE — $100–$150 (First attempt within 3–7 business days)
RUSH — $200–$250 (First attempt within 24–48 business hours)
SAME-DAY — $250–$300 (First attempt the same business day when documents are received during normal business hours)
EMAIL/MAIL — $75 (Where permitted; completed within 24–48 business hours from time of receipt)
STAKE-OUT — $325–$425 (Includes 1 hour waiting time; each additional hour $100-$150)

Includes 3 attempts (morning/afternoon/evening) + notarized Affidavit of Service/Due Diligence. Additional individuals: 50% off (same address/same order).

Place Order Online | Call (800) 774-6922

Serving legal papers on a homeless defendant in New York presents one of the most complex challenges in civil procedure. Without a fixed address, process servers must rely on diligence, creativity, and court-approved methods to ensure lawful notice. Each case requires balancing compassion with compliance, since even the most vulnerable defendants are entitled to due process. With over 15 years of experience providing verified and court-compliant service throughout New York, Undisputed Legal is uniquely equipped to navigate these situations with precision, discretion, and legal expertise.

It is very difficult to serve process on a defendant in New York who doesn’t have a permanent residence or is unhoused. CPLR Section 308 says that ordinary personal or substituted service needs an abode or place of business. If such aren’t accessible, a plaintiff might ask for alternative service under CPLR § 308(5), which is a court-approved procedure ‘in such manner as the court directs.’

If the defendant’s whereabouts is still unclear, the court may allow service by publication or, in certain situations, electronic service (email, social media, or other means) where it is likely to convey notice. If service is done wrong or not at all, it might make the court lose its jurisdiction. 

It’s important to record every effort in a signed affidavit of due diligence. Undisputed Legal process servers are experts in dealing with these kinds of cases. They use investigative tactics like skip tracing, data matching, and community outreach to make sure that documents are served and filed on time and in accordance with the law.

• When standard procedures under S 308(1)-(4) don’t work, CPLR  308(5) lets the court impose ‘alternative service.’
• The plaintiff must first prove reasonable diligence by making actual, recorded efforts to find and serve the defendant in person. Courts need comprehensive efforts, including visiting last known residences, reaching out to family, examining shelters, outreach centres, DMV and voter records, and confirming online or electronic contact information.
• If it is likely to reach the defendant, courts may allow service via publishing, electronic delivery, or posting at shelters or outreach centres.
• For electronic service to work, you have to show that the defendant is really using the email or account and that other means won’t work.
• If the service is not complete or is done wrong, default judgements might be dismissed.

PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS & MEMBERSHIPS

Frequently Asked Questions About How to Serve Legal Papers on a Homeless Defendant in New York

1. Before seeking for alternate service, what does ‘due diligence’ entail under CPLR Section 308?
   Due diligence needs real, recorded efforts to discover and serve the defendant, such going to old locations, calling friends, searching public databases (DMV, voter registers, court files), and trying to deliver the papers at multiple times of day. 
2. Is it possible for the court to allow service on a homeless individual who doesn’t have a residential address?
   Yes. If the court is sure that all usual ways of serving papers have been tried and failed, it may order alternative service, such posting or sending documents to a shelter, outreach worker, or by email or social media, if it is likely to reach the individual.
3. Is it permissible in New York to use email or social media for service?
   Only if a court says so under CPLR § 308(5). The plaintiff must show that the defendant owns the address or account and that it is likely that they will see the message. It helps to show that you have spoken to or done anything on that account before.
4. When is it okay to serve by publication?
   The court must be convinced that personal and substituted service can’t be done with due diligence. The plaintiff must suggest newspapers that are ‘most likely to give notice,’ and the notice must be published for four weeks in a row (three weeks in divorce proceedings).
5. What should an affidavit of due diligence include?
   A full record of every step performed, including the date, time, address, name of the person contacted, database searches, and the reason each attempt failed. Generic phrases like ‘defendant could not be found’ are not sufficient.
6. What happens if the affidavit is wrong or the service doesn’t work?
   Under CPLR Section 5015(a)(4), the defendant may contest jurisdiction or ask to have a default judgement overturned. If service wasn’t done lawfully, the courts may throw out the whole case.
7. If the defendant can’t be located, may the court give them more time to serve?
   Yes, according to CPLR section 306-b. If the plaintiffs can establish good reason or that an extension is in the interest of justice, they may ask for extra time. This is particularly true if the defendant is unhoused or moving around a lot.
8. How can process servers find someone who doesn’t have an address?
   Undisputed Legal process servers employ skip-tracing databases, credit headers, property records, utility data, monitoring on social media, and conversations with people they know or community connections like shelter personnel or outreach workers.
9. What if the defendant says later that they never received the notice?
   They can file a motion to vacate, but the court usually upholds the service as valid if it was done in a way that the court approved and was well-documented.

Trusted Legal References for Serving Legal Papers

Undisputed Legal Inc. – Serving Legal Papers (Domestic & International)
Provides professional and court-compliant service of legal papers across all 50 U.S. states and in over 120 countries, ensuring adherence to the Hague Service Convention, Letters Rogatory, and applicable local laws.
Phone Number: 212-203-8001

U.S. Courts – Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Rule 4: Service of Process)
Defines federal rules governing the service of legal papers in civil actions, including authorized servers, acceptable delivery methods, and proof-of-service requirements.
Phone Number: 202-502-2600

U.S. Department of State – Judicial Assistance: Service of Process Abroad
Outlines official U.S. guidance for serving legal documents internationally through Hague Service Convention mechanisms, Letters Rogatory, or diplomatic channels for non-Hague nations.
Phone Number: 1-888-407-4747

Hague Conference on Private International Law – Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents (1965)
Establishes the international framework for serving legal papers across borders, ensuring cooperation and uniform recognition among treaty signatories.

---

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: SERVING HOMELESS DEFENDANTS IN NEW YORK

The following resources expand on the legal standards and procedural safeguards that govern service of process when a defendant lacks a fixed residence. New York courts require heightened diligence, accurate documentation, and, in many cases, court authorization before alternative service methods are approved. These materials explain how courts evaluate reasonable efforts, what proof is required to establish due diligence, and which service options may be permitted when traditional personal or substituted service is impracticable. Together, these resources provide a court-recognized framework for completing lawful service on homeless defendants while minimizing challenges to jurisdiction.

---

FOUNDATIONAL NEW YORK SERVICE RULES

• New York Process Service
• Serving Legal Papers in New York: Laws, Deadlines, & Practices
• What Is Service of Process in New York? What You Need To Know
• New York Process Serving Laws: Common Questions Answered

---

DUE DILIGENCE, EVASION & LOCATION UNCERTAINTY

• How To Locate And Serve Someone Avoiding Service in New York
• Evasion vs. Refusal of Process Service In New York
• What If Someone Refuses Service of Process In New York?
• Can You Refuse Service of Process In New York? Key Facts

---

SUBSTITUTED, CONSTRUCTIVE & COURT-ORDERED SERVICE

• The Difference Between Personal Service vs. Substituted Service
• Understanding “Constructive Service” and When It Applies
• What is “Nail and Mail” Service in New York?
• Nail-And-Mail Process Service in New York: Refusal & Defenses
• Court Order Process Service By Publication In New York

---

PROOF REQUIREMENTS & JUDICIAL SCRUTINY

• Requirements For Affidavits of Service in New York Courts
• How Affidavits and GPS Logs Protect New York Judgments
• New York State Process Server Regulations: Compliance & Liability

---

WHEN SERVICE FAILS OR IS CHALLENGED

• What Are The Steps If Service Of Process Fails?
• Alternative Process Service In New York: What Happens Next
• Challenging Improper Process Service In New York – Vacating Default Judgments and Re-Service

---

RELATED NON-RESIDENT & INSTITUTIONAL SCENARIOS

• How To Serve Legal Papers on A Deceased Defendant in New York
• How To Serve An Inmate In New York Jail or Correctional Facility
• How To Serve Legal Papers Without a Physical Address

---

In New York State civil cases, service of process is the most important part of personal jurisdiction. This is a crucial step since it notifies the other party about the case and makes sure the procedures may continue. What happens, then, when you’re faced with the difficult question of how to serve court documents in the absence of an address? 

The Civil Practice Law & Rules (CPLR) say that appropriate service, whether it’s by personal delivery, substituted service, or another means ordered by the court, makes sure that the defendant knows about the case and has a chance to be heard. If a defendant is homeless, moving about a lot, or otherwise does not have a permanent ‘dwelling place’ or ‘usual place of abode,’ it may not be possible to serve them in the customary ways. If a defendant cannot be found at a fixed address, it creates a lot of procedural and jurisdictional risk. A private process server like those at Undisputed Legal can make sure that your papers are delivered, no matter what. 

When a client does not have an actual address for the person, it becomes much more difficult to serve court documents. Problems like this arise often when people relocate without making any note of their new address. Failed delivery attempts and lost time might occur even when this information is accessible since it can be obsolete or insufficient, for example, an inaccurate area code or a missing apartment number.

On rare occasions, the person may make an effort to avoid service of process by moving away from the point of contact. This is particularly difficult to navigate since their attempts to evade responsibility might cause major setbacks in the judicial process. When this individual does not have a permanent place to call home because they are unhoused or otherwise transitory, things grow even more complicated. Serving legal documents without a physical address becomes an important and often difficult undertaking in these situations.

CPLR Section 308 specifies personal service, or if that is not possible, the summons can be delivered to a person of appropriate age and discretion at the defendant’s actual place of business, dwelling, or usual place of abode. The summons can also be sent by first-class mail to the defendant’s last known residence or actual place of business. Then, if due diligence has been demonstrated, 

Section 308(5) gives the court the power to order service ‘in such manner as the court may direct’. Consequently, if a defendant does not have a permanent home, getting a court-ordered motion under S308(5) (alternative service) can be helpful with hard evidence that the other alternatives are unfeasible.

Due Diligence to Providing an Address When Serving Legal Documents

If adequate legal notice cannot be accomplished by conventional personal service, there are a number of other options that might be considered.  Without an address, a good process server like those at Undisputed Legal begins with collecting comprehensive personal information. In this instance, a client can have options both online and off when it comes to finding the individual you need.  Our servers will comb through several social networking sites, if it is possible to roughly locate a person’s whereabouts via the prevalence of location-sharing features, status updates, and check-ins at various locations.

Servers put people-finding tools online to use to narrow down phone numbers, and locations. Further, it can be important to reach out to loved ones. Process servers may get useful information by contacting people the defendant already knows, such as friends, relatives, or previous coworkers.  Hiring a private investigator might be the answer if clients are unsure of where to go for a person to serve legal documents. These experts focus on finding people who are difficult to reach or who are actively trying to evade assistance. Our Undisputed Legal skip tracers are well-versed in complex situations and can find crucial facts that would be impossible to get using more conventional means.

Since the general public does not have access to private investigators’ specialised equipment, sophisticated databases, and vast networks, they are able to determine a person’s present residence, place of employment, and other important facts. This method offers a dependable and effective technique to find evasive persons, but it may come with extra charges.

Service of Process through Electronic Meals

In some cases, digital and electronic channels may be permitted by the courts in lieu of in-person service of process. The goal of this strategy is to facilitate the electronic transmission of documents using various internet channels, such as email and social media. Nevertheless, it is not always approved and often needs the green light from the court. A plaintiff will need to prove that they have recorded and tried every feasible physical service option before you can go on.

While electronic service has many advantages, it also has its own set of difficulties. Problems might arise when emails are marked as spam, when file sizes surpass certain restrictions, or when receivers choose to disregard social network alerts. It is common practice for courts to demand confirmation from the receiver that they have received and acknowledged the papers in order to satisfy legal obligations. This is why a court order is necessary for the smooth operation of such a service.

If both sides agree, or if the defendant’s contact information is known for sure and is likely to reach them, the court may approve service via email or another digital method.  However, courts warn that technological service is not always the same as physical service. The plaintiff must demonstrate  that service by conventional means was unfeasible; and that the electronic address is trustworthy and the manner suitably designed to inform the defendant.  So, for a homeless or transitory defendant, electronic service is one of the instruments, but only after the best efforts have been made to find them and traditional service has been used, and only if the record shows that the defendant can be reached electronically. 

Process Service via Publication

Publication as a means of service is often the last resort after all other options have been exhausted. This procedure entails posting a legal notice in a newspaper or another media that has been authorised by the court to inform the person of litigation. Legal clearance accompanied by specific proof of your search attempts is required before you can go further with this strategy. After approval, the notice is published for a certain amount of time, usually a few weeks, depending on your jurisdiction. Although it is more unreliable than other ways, service by publication ensures that legal proceedings may proceed even when contacting the subject proves difficult.

When faced with a challenging case, a process server like those at Undisputed Legal can help with finding people who are difficult to reach, or who are deliberately avoiding assistance. They are duly qualified and trained to assure the proper delivery of court papers in accordance with legal norms. Unhoused folk or those who move around a lot due to housing instability are not always easy to keep tabs on.  If the defendant does not have a permanent residence, process servers may have to resort to more creative means of service, such reaching out to friends and family or looking for information in public databases. No amount of trying will lead to any results when contact information (such as email addresses, phone numbers, and job data) is out of date. As such, service by publication can often be the only option. 

What Do You Do If You Are Unable To Serve Someone?

When all other options have been exhausted, what happens when you still can’t locate the person? The court has the authority to provide additional time to try serving the document if the first effort fails. In most cases, judges will assume that plaintiffs have tried all plausible avenues of service before examining any further possibilities. 

The likelihood of obtaining an alternate form of service increases in proportion to the amount of evidence offered to the court demonstrating serious endeavours. In many jurisdictions, process servers are permitted to leave papers with a responsible adult at the last known residence or place of employment of the defendant. An employer or relative might fit this description. The last known address of a person may be used by the court to serve legal documents in certain cases. Cases involving eviction or defendant abandonment of property often make use of this.

The court may let the case go on without the defendant as a default judgment if they persist in avoiding service after several recorded efforts. This is especially important in civil disputes where the defendant has the option to respond or face a default judgement. If the defendant does not show up or answer, the court may grant the plaintiff a default judgement. However, in order for courts to make such a decision, it is usually necessary to provide evidence that the individual was provided an equal opportunity to participate.

It is possible for the defendant to claim a lack of adequate notification even after the court has allowed alternate service or granted a default judgement. Their ability to show that the service was flawed or that they were unaware of the case gives them the grounds to ask the court to reverse the decision and start again. This is why meticulous record-keeping and adherence to all legal processes are vital. The likelihood of a successful challenge is significantly reduced if service was performed in accordance with a court-approved technique and with correct documentation.

What happens if address information is merely incomplete?

When you hire a professional process server to serve papers, the court is more likely to be satisfied with the sufficiency of service efforts since they will be knowledgeable with New York State’s rules and the several methods a person may be properly served. A defendant’s subjectivity to the Court’s jurisdiction does not exclude them from the possibility of dismissal based on the claim that service was not properly effectuated.’

Individuals, corporations, and public agencies may all be served with legal documents using the various channels made available by the CPLR. Consequently, it is common practice to seek out possible defendants using public data, such as those kept by the DMV. The question then becomes what happens when a process server uses inaccurate information to serve process on a licensee or registrant who has neglected to update their address with the  In the case of Castillo-Florez v. Charlecius, due to the defendant’s non-appearance, the plaintiff sought a default judgement. Since the defendant failed to update his mailing address with the DMV as required by state law, service upon him at that address was nevertheless permissible. 

A defendant can be prevented from challenging the service of summonses and complaints sent to their previous residence simply because they did not notify the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles of a change of address in a timely manner. Further, a defendant can be prevented from contesting the location and propriety of process serving if they have intentionally misled a party into accepting service at the wrong address. 

Parties may nonetheless find a location that counts as a ‘usual place of abode’ for substitution service under § 308(2), even if the individual is homeless or only passing through. Courts say that a ‘usual place of abode’ is a location where a person goes back to again and over again, or where they live with some regularity. Once a server has found a location as such, they may give the documents to a person who is old to comprehend them, and then send a copy to the individual’s last known address. This information must be recorded in the affidavit.

An affidavit of due diligence indicating attempts to find and serve, a suggested other way to serve papers is is to a recognised shelter, a community liaison or outreach worker, or even a publication with a posting at a shelter or known transit station. It is necessary to ensure that the suggested approach is ‘reasonably calculated’ to provide the defendant notice and a chance to be heard (i.e., due process). 

If clients know that a defendant is homeless or moves around a lot, a process server should by looking into their situation. Servers will visit shelters and outreach centres, check their last known residences, verify their email and phone numbers, and question friends or family. It is necessary to record the date, time, and location of each attempt, contact, discovery or why contact could not be made (closed door, denied admission, or no access to the unit).

For plaintiffs, the key is a comprehensive investigation, careful record-keeping, and smart motion practice. For defendants,  it is necessary to carefully look at those service attempts and make sure that the jurisdictional requirements (notice and chance to be heard) are accomplished.  In this difficult situation, process servers must approach this area with the same care as the case’s fundamental merits. We at Undisputed Legal are here to make sure that your papers are served, no matter where you may be.

Best Practices to Serve Legal Papers on a Homeless Defendant in New York

Successfully navigating the challenges of service on homeless or transient individuals in New York requires strict adherence to due diligence, statutory compliance, and professional ethics. Courts expect process servers to make reasonable, well-documented efforts before seeking alternative methods under CPLR §308(5).

Best Practices include:

• Conduct a thorough investigation: Verify potential service locations by reviewing court filings, police reports, shelter logs, or prior addresses before requesting substituted or alternative service.
• Document every attempt: Maintain detailed logs of all visits, timestamps, and witness statements to demonstrate diligence.
• Use skip tracing technology: Employ digital tools and databases to locate current whereabouts through credit records, social media, or government databases.
• Coordinate with shelters and outreach organizations: Process servers may obtain valuable information by contacting community programs or housing service providers.
• Ensure affidavit precision: Courts require affidavits that clearly outline all steps taken, failed attempts, and reasons for alternative service.
• Adhere to privacy and dignity standards: Always maintain professionalism and discretion when approaching vulnerable individuals.

By implementing these best practices, process servers show that every effort was made to serve legal papers on a homeless defendant in New York in a lawful, respectful, and transparent manner.

Case Studies: Alternate Service Successes in New York

Understanding how courts interpret diligence and fairness provides valuable lessons for process servers. The following examples highlight successful and unsuccessful service attempts in similar scenarios.

Case Study 1: Verified Due Diligence (Brooklyn, 2021)
A plaintiff’s process server documented three failed attempts at a known shelter and an outreach center. The court accepted alternate service via affixing and mailing under CPLR §308(4), finding the affidavit detailed and credible.

Case Study 2: Incomplete Documentation (Queens, 2020)
Service was deemed invalid when the affidavit lacked timestamps and specific addresses of attempted delivery. The judge ruled that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate proper diligence before requesting substituted service.

Case Study 3: Court-Approved Electronic Service (Manhattan, 2022)
When a defendant’s last known contact was an active email address, the court granted permission for electronic service under CPLR §308(5). The process server’s proof of prior attempts and documented online communication persuaded the court that this method was “reasonably calculated to provide notice.”

Each example underscores a consistent lesson: courts demand transparency and thorough effort before approving unconventional methods to serve legal papers on a homeless defendant in New York.

Why Choose Undisputed Legal

Choosing Undisputed Legal means working with a team that combines legal precision, investigative expertise, and ethical professionalism. Our licensed process servers understand the complexity of cases involving defendants without fixed addresses and have the training, tools, and integrity necessary to meet every compliance standard in New York State.

Why clients trust Undisputed Legal:

• Licensed & Bonded Professionals: Every process server is fully authorized under New York law.
• GPS-Verified Service: Each attempt to serve legal papers on a homeless defendant in New York is logged and time-stamped for verification.
• Comprehensive Affidavit Management: We prepare detailed, court-compliant proofs of service with accuracy and clarity.
• Skip Tracing Expertise: Our investigative resources locate even the most transient defendants across multiple jurisdictions.
• Statewide & International Reach: Whether within New York City or abroad, we handle complex service needs with the same precision.

Undisputed Legal stands as a trusted authority in process service — ensuring every document is delivered lawfully, ethically, and with full transparency.

Conclusion: Professional Diligence Ensures Justice

Serving homeless or transient defendants presents one of the most challenging procedural tasks in civil litigation. However, with diligence, documentation, and compliance, it is entirely possible to fulfill the legal requirement of notice without infringing upon a defendant’s rights.

Undisputed Legal emphasizes professionalism, compassion, and accuracy at every stage of service. From investigative skip tracing to verified affidavits, our experienced team ensures that each effort to serve legal papers on a homeless defendant in New York meets both the spirit and the letter of the law.

Order Process Service Today

When a case involves a defendant without a fixed address, trust the professionals who know how to deliver — literally. Undisputed Legal provides court-approved, GPS-tracked, and fully documented process service across New York. Our experienced staff ensures compliance, accuracy, and accountability at every step.

We offer:

• Same-day and rush service options across New York counties.
• GPS-verified affidavits of service accepted by all state and federal courts.
• Real-time updates through our secure online portal.
• Investigative support and skip tracing for hard-to-locate individuals.

Contact Undisputed Legal today at (800) 774-6922 or visit UndisputedLegal.com to order process service and ensure your legal documents are handled with the professionalism and precision your case deserves.

WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING

---

FOR ASSISTANCE SERVING LEGAL PAPERS IN NEW YORK

Click the “Place Order” button at the top of this page or call us at (800) 774-6922 to begin. Our team of experienced process servers is ready to assist you with reliable and efficient service of your documents, ensuring compliance with all legal requirements. We offer both comprehensive support and à la carte services tailored to your specific needs:

• Prompt and professional service of process
• Accurate completion of affidavits of service
• Rush service for time-sensitive matters
• Skip tracing for hard-to-locate parties
• Detailed reporting on service attempts

Don’t risk case delays or dismissals due to improper service. Let Undisputed Legal’s skilled team handle the important task of serving legal papers for you. Our diligent, professional service helps attorneys, pro se litigants, and parents ensure their papers are served correctly and on time.

Take the first step towards ensuring proper service in your case – click “Place Order” or call (800) 774-6922 now. Let Undisputed Legal be your trusted partner in navigating the critical process of serving your documents.

“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives” – Foster, William A

Sources

¹ This necessitates keeping track of all the steps taken to find and serve the person, including iterative efforts spread out throughout the day, reaching out to past or current coworkers or bosses or implementing skip-tracing strategies and database

² New York Laws CVP – Civil Practice Law and Rules Article 32 – Accelerated Judgment,  3215 – Default Judgment. NY CPLR § 3215 (2024)

³ Vacating a default judgment | NY COURTHELP. (n.d.-z). https://www.nycourts.gov/courthelp/aftercourt/vacatingdefault.shtml 

⁴ Keane v. Kamin, 94 N.Y.2d 263, 265 (1999

⁵ If a licensee’s address changes, they are obligated to inform the DMV within ten days according to Vehicle and Traffic Law Section 505(5). The same is true for car registrations as stated in car and Traffic Law 401(3).

⁶ A bus operated by the individual defendant and owned by the MTA struck the plaintiff in the Castillo-Florez case. The injured party has filed a claim for damages. Process was served on the individual defendant at an address shown in their driver’s license records by an adult having the discretion to do so.

⁷ The plaintiff included copies of the pertinent DMV documents revealing the out-of-date address in the process server’s affidavit, which supported the motion. Defendant filed an affidavit denying service and stating he was not residing at the [address indicated in the DMV records] at the time service was allegedly made, thus rebutting the presumption of service arising from the process server’s affidavit. Defendant further claimed he did not default because he was never served with process. 

⁸ Hudson Val. Bank, N.A. v. Eagle Trading, 208 A.D.3d 648, 650 (2nd Dep’t 2022)

DIRECTIONS TO OUR NEW YORK CITY HEADQUARTERS

For access to our New York City corporate headquarters at One World Trade Center, 85th Floor, please click the embedded map and call ahead to be added to building security. Be sure to bring all necessary documents and payment to expedite your visit. Undisputed Legal Inc. maintains offices in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. We provide legal support services in all 50 states and over 120 countries worldwide.

Professional Credentials & Affiliations

Undisputed Legal Inc. maintains active membership and affiliations with the following professional organizations: National Association of Professional Process Servers (NAPPS), United States Process Servers Association (USPSA), National Association of Legal Support Professionals (NAOSP), Better Business Bureau (BBB) A+ Rating, New York State Unified Court System, DCWP Licensed Process Server (NYC), International Association of Professional Process Servers, National Notary Association, American Bar Association (ABA) – Allied Member, New York County Lawyers Association, Brooklyn Bar Association, Queens County Bar Association, Bronx County Bar Association, Staten Island Bar Association, Westchester County Bar Association, and Nassau County Bar Association.

Additional Resources

• Manhattan Process Service
• Brooklyn Process Service
• Queens Process Service
• Bronx Process Service
• Staten Island Process Service
• Connecticut Process Service
• Washington D.C. Process Service
• All Process Services
• Subpoena Services
• Court Services