Importance of Accurate Affidavits of Service in New Jersey Courts

Last Updated: February 7, 2026

Featured Snippet — Quick Reference

Affidavits of Service in New Jersey Courts serve as the primary evidentiary record by which judges determine whether service of process was valid, jurisdiction was properly obtained, and court orders may be enforced. New Jersey courts rely heavily on the accuracy, completeness, and credibility of affidavits of service, and even minor defects can render service insufficient or void, regardless of actual notice.

• An affidavit of service is a jurisdictional document in New Jersey, not a clerical formality.
• New Jersey courts scrutinize affidavits of service for accuracy, specificity, and rule compliance.
• Defective or inconsistent affidavits routinely result in dismissal or vacatur of judgments.
• Actual notice does not cure a defective affidavit of service in New Jersey courts.
• Different affidavit requirements apply across civil, family, and Special Civil Part matters.
• The return of service is often the only evidence courts rely on when service is challenged.

Table of Contents

The sections below are organized to reflect how New Jersey courts evaluate affidavits of service, moving from authority and jurisdictional purpose to proof standards, court-specific requirements, and common affidavit failures that undermine enforcement.

• Featured Snippet _Quick Reference
• How Process Service Works For Various Legal Documents (Video)
• Executive Summary
• Authority Spine: Affidavits of Service Under New Jersey Court Rules
• Why Affidavits of Service Are Jurisdictional in New Jersey Courts
• What New Jersey Courts Require in an Affidavit of Service
• Accuracy, Specificity, and Credibility Standards Applied by NJ Courts
• Proof of Service vs. Proof of Delivery in New Jersey
• Court-Specific Affidavit Requirements: Civil, Family, and Special Civil Part
• Common Affidavit Defects and Judicial Consequences
• Professional Credentials & Memberships
• Frequently Asked Questions About Affidavits of Service in New Jersey Courts
• Additional Resources: New Jersey Process Service Law & Practice
• Notable Legal Landmarks & POIS
• New Jersey Process Service Updates (GMB)
• What Our Clients Are Saying (Reviews)
• For Assistance Serving Legal Papers
• Sources & Legal References
• Editorial Note On Use
• Directions To Our New Jersey Office (Map)

Executive Summary

Accurate affidavits of service in New Jersey courts function as sworn evidentiary records that judges rely on to determine whether service of process was validly completed and whether the court may exercise jurisdiction over a party. In New Jersey practice, an affidavit of service is not treated as a clerical confirmation of delivery; it is the formal proof by which the court evaluates what occurred, who was served, and whether the service record supports reliance without reconstruction or inference. Because affidavits often constitute the only evidence of service, their precision and internal consistency carry decisive weight in litigation.

This article examines affidavits of service from an evidentiary and record-integrity perspective. It focuses on the rule-based requirements governing affidavits in New Jersey, the standards courts apply when assessing accuracy and credibility, and the common defects that undermine the probative value of service proof. The analysis is directed at how affidavits are read, tested, and relied upon by courts—particularly when service is challenged, defaults are sought, or enforcement depends on the strength of the written record.

This discussion is intentionally limited to affidavit construction, sufficiency, and defect risk. It does not explain service methods, execution mechanics, or tactical considerations. For the broader court-compliance framework New Jersey judges apply when service is disputed—including due process, jurisdictional posture, and judicial scrutiny—see How New Jersey Process Servers Ensure Legal Compliance.

Authority Spine: Affidavits of Service Under New Jersey Court Rules

Affidavits of service in New Jersey courts are governed by the New Jersey Court Rules, which establish the legal authority for how service of process must be documented and proven. These rules make clear that an affidavit of service New Jersey courts is not merely confirmatory; it is the mechanism by which courts determine whether service complied with the rules and whether jurisdiction was properly obtained. As a result, affidavits of service operate at the intersection of procedure, evidence, and due process.

The primary authority governing affidavits and returns of service appears in Rule 4:4-7, which requires that proof of service be made by affidavit or certification and that it state the date, place, manner of service, and the person served. Courts rely on this rule to assess whether the affidavit establishes compliance with the applicable service method authorized by the rules. Where the affidavit fails to demonstrate rule-compliant service on its face, courts may find service insufficient without reaching factual disputes.

New Jersey courts also apply Rule 1:4-4 regarding certifications, which governs the form and content of sworn statements submitted to the court. Affidavits of service that do not meet the standards for sworn or certified statements—whether due to improper execution, missing attestations, or internal inconsistencies—are vulnerable to challenge. Courts do not assume validity simply because an affidavit is filed.

Beyond the text of the rules, New Jersey courts have developed a consistent jurisprudential approach to affidavits of service. Judges evaluate whether the affidavit establishes a prima facie showing of proper service, which creates a rebuttable presumption of validity. That presumption exists only if the affidavit is complete, specific, and credible. Where the affidavit is conclusory or ambiguous, courts may decline to apply the presumption altogether.

Because affidavits of service function as the evidentiary backbone of service of process, New Jersey courts treat them as jurisdictional instruments, not administrative paperwork. Understanding this authority spine is essential to evaluating why NJ affidavit of service requirements are enforced strictly and why errors in service proof frequently determine the outcome of jurisdictional challenges.

Why Affidavit Precision Controls the Court Record

In New Jersey courts, affidavits of service control the court record because they are treated as sworn evidence, not narrative summaries of what a process server recalls after the fact. Judges rely on the affidavit to understand the service event as it occurred, using the document to reconstruct the who, where, and how of service without supplementation. When the affidavit is precise and internally consistent, the court can evaluate service on the papers alone. When it is vague or contradictory, the record itself becomes unreliable.

Affidavit precision matters because courts do not infer missing facts or resolve ambiguities in favor of the serving party. If the affidavit leaves unanswered questions—such as uncertainty about the recipient’s identity, the location of service, or the manner used—the court’s analysis stalls at the document level. In that situation, the affidavit no longer functions as reliable proof, and the service record may be deemed insufficient regardless of what may have occurred in practice.

New Jersey courts also assess affidavits as integrated components of the case file. Judges compare the affidavit against pleadings, motions, and other submissions to determine whether the service narrative is consistent across the record. Discrepancies in dates, descriptions, or identifying details undermine credibility because they suggest that the affidavit cannot be relied upon as an accurate account. Precision, in this sense, is not about formality—it is about preserving the integrity of the court’s evidentiary foundation.

For this reason, affidavit accuracy directly affects whether service can be accepted as a settled procedural fact or becomes a disputed issue requiring further examination. A precise affidavit allows the court to proceed confidently; an imprecise one shifts attention away from the merits of the case and toward the reliability of the service record itself.

What New Jersey Courts Require in an Affidavit of Service

New Jersey courts evaluate affidavits of service in New Jersey courts by examining whether the document establishes, on its face, that service complied with the New Jersey Court Rules. Courts do not infer compliance or fill gaps with assumptions. Instead, they require the affidavit to contain specific, verifiable information demonstrating lawful service and supporting the court’s exercise of jurisdiction.

At a minimum, a New Jersey court affidavit of service must clearly identify who performed service and under what authority. Courts expect the affidavit to establish that the server was authorized under the applicable rule and that the service was performed in that authorized capacity. Failure to identify service authority is a common basis for findings of insufficient service of process New Jersey.

The affidavit must also specify the date, time, and location of service, along with a description of the manner of service used. Courts examine whether the service method described aligns with one permitted under the New Jersey rules for service of process. Vague descriptions—such as stating only that service was “completed” or “effected”—are typically insufficient to establish compliance.

Identification of the person served is another critical requirement. The affidavit should state the name of the individual served and, where applicable, the person’s relationship to the defendant or authority to accept service. Courts scrutinize affidavits closely where service is made on someone other than the named defendant, as these situations frequently give rise to jurisdictional challenges.

Finally, New Jersey courts require that affidavits of service be properly sworn or certified in accordance with the Rules of Court. Affidavits that are unsigned, unsworn, improperly notarized, or inconsistent with certification requirements undermine the reliability of the service record. Such defects can defeat the presumption of valid service even if other details appear compliant.

Together, these requirements reflect the courts’ insistence on precision and credibility in New Jersey affidavit of service requirements. An affidavit that fails to include these elements exposes the service to challenge and places the court’s jurisdiction at risk.

Accuracy, Specificity, and Credibility Standards Applied by NJ Courts

When New Jersey courts evaluate affidavits of service, they do so as sworn evidentiary submissions rather than procedural checklists. Accuracy is essential because the affidavit is expected to reflect what occurred with factual precision. Errors involving dates, locations, recipient identity, or descriptions of service events undermine the affidavit’s reliability as a court record. Courts do not treat these inaccuracies as clerical oversights when they affect the core facts the affidavit is meant to establish.

Specificity is equally critical. Courts require affidavits to describe the service event in concrete, verifiable terms rather than general or conclusory language. Statements asserting that service was completed “in accordance with the rules” or “as required by law” provide no factual basis for judicial evaluation. Without specific details, courts are unable to assess whether the affidavit accurately reflects the service event or aligns with the governing requirements reflected elsewhere in the record.

Credibility is assessed by examining the affidavit as part of the broader case file. Judges compare the affidavit against pleadings, motions, and other submissions to determine whether the narrative is internally consistent. Discrepancies—such as conflicting dates, inconsistent descriptions, or mismatched identifying details—raise concerns about whether the affidavit can be relied upon as an accurate account. Inconsistency, rather than intent, is often the decisive factor in how courts evaluate affidavit reliability.

When affidavits meet these standards, they function as dependable records that allow courts to resolve service questions on the papers alone. When they do not, the affidavit itself becomes the source of uncertainty. This evidentiary approach explains why New Jersey courts emphasize accuracy, specificity, and credibility when reviewing affidavits of service and why deficiencies in these areas frequently undermine the usefulness of service proof.

Proof of Service vs. Proof of Delivery in New Jersey

New Jersey courts draw a clear and critical distinction between proof of service and proof of delivery, a distinction that directly affects how affidavits of service in New Jersey courts are evaluated. While proof of delivery may establish that papers reached a recipient, proof of service must demonstrate that delivery occurred in a manner authorized by the New Jersey Court Rules. Courts will not equate the two.

Proof of delivery focuses on whether documents were physically received. This may be evidenced by acknowledgments, receipts, or admissions of receipt. However, New Jersey courts consistently hold that delivery alone does not establish jurisdiction. Without a rule-compliant service method and proper documentation, delivery is legally insufficient.

Proof of service, by contrast, requires a sworn affidavit or certification establishing who served the papers, under what authority, how service was completed, and whether the method used complied with the applicable rule. The affidavit must show that service was lawful, not merely that papers changed hands. Courts rely on this distinction when evaluating motions to dismiss or to vacate judgments based on service defects.

This distinction becomes especially important in cases where defendants acknowledge receipt but challenge service validity. New Jersey courts routinely reject arguments that actual receipt cures improper service. An affidavit of service New Jersey courts must establish lawful service on its face; otherwise, jurisdiction fails regardless of notice.

Understanding the difference between proof of service and proof of delivery explains why New Jersey courts insist on precise affidavits and why proof of service NJ courts is treated as a jurisdictional prerequisite. Delivery without lawful service is insufficient to confer court authority.

Court-Specific Affidavit Requirements: Civil, Family, and Special Civil Part

While the core standards governing affidavits of service in New Jersey courts are consistent statewide, New Jersey courts apply those standards within court-specific procedural contexts. Civil, family, and Special Civil Part matters each involve distinct considerations that affect how affidavits of service are reviewed and whether service will be deemed valid.

In civil actions, affidavits of service are evaluated under the general civil rules governing service of process and proof. Courts expect affidavits to establish strict compliance with the applicable service method and to support jurisdiction before substantive litigation proceeds. In civil cases involving default judgments or enforcement proceedings, judges scrutinize affidavits carefully to ensure that service was lawful and properly documented. Defects in a New Jersey affidavit of service in this context frequently result in dismissal or vacatur.

Family court matters receive heightened judicial scrutiny due to the sensitive rights at stake, including custody, support, and restraining orders. Courts examine affidavits of service closely to confirm that service complied with both the Court Rules and any family-part–specific requirements. Ambiguities in affidavits—particularly regarding who was served or how service was completed—can delay proceedings or undermine enforceability. As a result, affidavit of service requirements family court New Jersey are enforced rigorously to protect due process.

The Special Civil Part, while designed for efficiency, does not relax affidavit standards. Courts require affidavits of service to establish valid service with the same level of specificity and accuracy demanded in higher civil courts. Because judgments from the Special Civil Part are often enforced later, courts pay close attention to service documentation to ensure that jurisdiction was properly obtained at the outset. Defective affidavits in this forum can defeat enforcement even after judgment is entered.

Across all divisions, New Jersey courts apply a uniform principle: jurisdiction depends on a credible, rule-compliant affidavit of service. Understanding how affidavit requirements operate within different court contexts is essential to evaluating whether proof of service New Jersey courts will withstand challenge.

Common Affidavit Defects and Judicial Consequences

New Jersey courts encounter recurring affidavit defects that undermine the reliability of service records and prevent courts from relying on the affidavit as sworn evidence. These defects are not treated as technical errors; they are evaluated based on whether the affidavit can be trusted as an accurate and complete account of the service event. When defects affect the core facts the affidavit is intended to establish, courts frequently find the proof insufficient on its face.

One common defect involves omission of essential details. Affidavits that fail to clearly state the date, time, location, or manner of service leave the court without a factual basis to evaluate what occurred. Courts do not supply missing information by inference, and affidavits that omit these fundamentals often lose evidentiary value regardless of other content.

Identity and role ambiguity is another frequent problem. Affidavits that do not clearly identify the person served—or that fail to explain that individual’s relationship or capacity when service is made on someone other than the named party—create uncertainty within the court record. Where authority or identity is unclear, courts are unable to rely on the affidavit without further clarification.

Courts also give significant weight to internal inconsistencies. Discrepancies between the affidavit and other filings, conflicting dates, or inconsistent descriptions of the service event weaken credibility. Even minor contradictions can cause courts to question whether the affidavit accurately reflects what occurred, particularly when no additional evidence is available to resolve the inconsistency.

Defects related to execution and certification further erode affidavit reliability. Affidavits that are improperly sworn, incorrectly certified, unsigned, or inconsistent with applicable certification requirements fail to meet evidentiary standards. Courts may disregard such affidavits entirely, treating them as insufficient proof rather than curable irregularities.

The judicial consequences of these defects are procedural but substantial. Courts may decline to rely on the affidavit, require additional proof, deny relief dependent on service, or determine that service has not been adequately established on the record. These outcomes shift attention away from the merits of the case and toward the adequacy of the service documentation itself, underscoring why precision in affidavit preparation is essential.

PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS & MEMBERSHIPS

Professional process service demands accountability, verified credentials, and alignment with recognized legal and industry standards. Undisputed Legal Inc. maintains active memberships and affiliations that reflect our ongoing commitment to compliance, education, and ethical practice across jurisdictions, including matters before New Jersey courts where affidavits of service are relied upon for jurisdiction, default judgments, and enforcement. These credentials reinforce the professional standards under which affidavits of service and proof documentation are prepared and maintained.

These credentials support our work in New Jersey and beyond, reinforcing the standards applied to documentation accuracy, sworn statements, and defensible proof of service:

Primary Professional Affiliations:

• Better Business Bureau — Accredited Business (A+ Rating, since 2014)
• National Association of Professional Process Servers (NAPPS)
• New York State Professional Process Server Association

Additional Professional Memberships:

• Mississippi Association of Professional Process Servers
• Arizona Process Servers Association
• Mid-Atlantic Association of Professional Process Servers
• California Association of Legal Professionals
• Colorado Process Servers Association
• North Carolina Association of Professional Process Servers
• Oregon Association of Process Servers
• Westchester Bar Association
• New Jersey State Bar Association
• Mortgage Bankers Association
• American Legal and Financial Network
• National Creditors Bar Association
• National Notary Association

In addition, Undisputed Legal Inc. has been recognized as “Best in New York” since 2015, reflecting sustained service quality and professional reliability in one of the nation’s most demanding legal environments. These affiliations and recognitions underscore our position as a process service provider trusted by attorneys, institutions, and courts where accurate affidavits of service in New Jersey courts may determine jurisdiction, enforceability, and case outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions About Affidavits of Service in New Jersey Courts

Affidavits of service play a decisive role in how New Jersey courts determine jurisdiction, validity of service, and enforceability of court orders. The questions below address how affidavits of service in New Jersey courts are evaluated and why accuracy and compliance are critical—without providing execution or tactical guidance.

Why are affidavits of service so important in New Jersey courts?
In New Jersey, affidavits of service are treated as jurisdictional evidence. Courts rely on the affidavit to determine whether service of process complied with the New Jersey Court Rules and whether the court lawfully acquired personal jurisdiction over a party. An inaccurate or incomplete affidavit can invalidate service even if the defendant received notice.

Does actual notice cure a defective affidavit of service in New Jersey?
No. New Jersey courts consistently hold that actual notice does not cure a defective affidavit of service. Jurisdiction must be established through a rule-compliant affidavit that accurately documents lawful service, not inferred from a party’s awareness of the case.

What happens if an affidavit of service contains errors or omissions?
If an affidavit of service is vague, inconsistent, or incomplete, courts may find service insufficient or invalid. Common consequences include dismissal of the action, denial of default relief, or vacatur of judgments already entered, particularly where jurisdiction is challenged.

Are affidavit of service requirements the same in all New Jersey courts?
While the core requirements are consistent, New Jersey courts apply affidavit standards within court-specific contexts, including civil, family, and Special Civil Part matters. Judges evaluate affidavits in light of the forum and the rights at issue, but strict compliance is required across all divisions.

When do affidavit defects usually surface in New Jersey cases?
Affidavit defects most often emerge when a defendant challenges jurisdiction, when a plaintiff seeks a default judgment, or during enforcement proceedings. At those stages, courts closely scrutinize the affidavit as the primary proof of lawful service.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: NEW JERSEY PROCESS SERVICE LAW & PRACTICE

The following resources provide supplemental guidance related to affidavits of service in New Jersey courts, including statewide service-of-process rules, proof standards relied upon by judges, and jurisdiction-specific considerations that frequently arise when service is challenged. These articles are selected to strengthen the New Jersey process service cluster and support the primary New Jersey Process Service page, while keeping this article focused on affidavit accuracy, credibility, and court scrutiny.

STATEWIDE RULES & LEGAL FRAMEWORK

• Understanding New Jersey Service of Process Laws

COMPLIANCE & JUDICIAL ANALYSIS

• How New Jersey Process Servers Ensure Legal Compliance

DOCUMENT-TYPE & PROOF CONTEXT

• How New Jersey Laws Impact Subpoena Delivery

COUNTY & JURISDICTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

• Key Differences In Process Serving Across New Jersey Counties
• Process Serving In New Jersey Vs. Neighboring States

NOTABLE LEGAL LANDMARKS & POIS

• New Jersey Superior Court – Civil, Family & Special Civil Part Divisions – New Jersey – Trial-level divisions where affidavits of service are reviewed as sworn proof supporting jurisdiction, defaults, and enforcement.
• New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division – New Jersey – Appellate forum where affidavit sufficiency and service records are examined when jurisdiction or service validity is challenged.
• New Jersey Judiciary eCourts System – Statewide – Electronic filing system through which affidavits of service are submitted, preserved, and relied upon as part of the official court record.
• Special Civil Part – New Jersey – High-volume division where affidavit precision is critical due to streamlined proceedings and later enforcement reliance.

ZIP Codes Associated with High-Volume Affidavit Review (Examples):

• 08608 – Trenton (Mercer County) – Administrative and appellate activity center where affidavit records are frequently evaluated.
• 07030 – Hoboken (Hudson County) – Dense residential and commercial litigation corridor where affidavit clarity is often outcome-determinative.

Key Judicial Context References:

• Trenton (Mercer County) /
  Newark (Essex County) /
  Hackensack (Bergen County) – Common venues where affidavit sufficiency is scrutinized during motion practice, defaults, and appellate review.

NEW JERSEY PROCESS SERVICE UPDATES

To stay informed about our latest developments in New Jersey related to New Jersey process service and legal services, we encourage you to visit our Blog Videos, and Google My Business page. Our GMB page is a crucial resource, providing timely information and the latest articles to ensure you have access to the most relevant updates. Connect with us directly here to stay well-informed about process service in New Jersey.

WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING

FOR ASSISTANCE SERVING LEGAL PAPERS

Click the “Place Order” button at the top of this page or call us at (800) 774-6922 to begin. Our team of experienced process servers is ready to assist you with reliable and efficient service of your documents, ensuring compliance with all legal requirements. We offer both comprehensive support and à la carte services tailored to your specific needs:

• Prompt and professional service of process
• Accurate completion of affidavits of service
• Rush service for time-sensitive matters
• Skip tracing for hard-to-locate parties
• Detailed reporting on service attempts

Don’t risk case delays or dismissals due to improper service. Let Undisputed Legal’s skilled team handle the important task of serving legal papers for you. Our diligent, professional service helps attorneys, pro se litigants, and parents ensure their papers are served correctly and on time.

Take the first step towards ensuring proper service in your case – click “Place Order” or call (800) 774-6922 now. Let Undisputed Legal be your trusted partner in navigating the critical process of serving your documents.

“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives” – Foster, William A

SOURCES & LEGAL REFERENCES

This section anchors the analysis of Affidavits of Service in New Jersey Courts to primary legal authority governing how service of process must be documented, evaluated, and relied upon by New Jersey courts. The sources below are organized to reflect the analytical path courts follow: (1) controlling New Jersey Court Rules governing proof and affidavits; (2) statutory and procedural consequences tied to defective service; and (3) judicial principles applied when affidavits are challenged for credibility or sufficiency.

These references are provided to support court-facing legal analysis, compliance review, and risk assessment. They are not intended to provide procedural or step-by-step service instruction.

A) NEW JERSEY COURT RULES — AFFIDAVITS AND PROOF OF SERVICE

New Jersey Court Rule 4:4-7 — Proof of Service
Establishes the requirement that service of process be proven by affidavit or certification and specifies the information New Jersey courts rely on when determining whether service was valid.
https://www.njcourts.gov/sites/default/files/rules/r4-4.pdf

New Jersey Court Rule 1:4-4 — Affidavits; certifications; verification
Governs the form, execution, and evidentiary standards for affidavits and certifications submitted to New Jersey courts, including affidavits of service.
https://www.njcourts.gov/sites/default/files/rules/r1-4.pdf

New Jersey Court Rule 4:4-4 — Manner of Service
Defines permissible service methods and provides the substantive framework an affidavit of service must support to establish lawful service.
https://www.njcourts.gov/sites/default/files/rules/r4-4.pdf

B) JURISDICTIONAL CONSEQUENCES — DEFECTIVE SERVICE AND PROOF

New Jersey appellate principle: service of process is jurisdictional
New Jersey courts consistently hold that defective service or defective proof of service deprives the court of personal jurisdiction and is not cured by actual notice.
https://www.njcourts.gov/attorneys/opinions

Judicial treatment of defective affidavits of service
Courts routinely dismiss actions, deny default judgments, or vacate judgments where affidavits of service are vague, inconsistent, or noncompliant with Court Rules.
https://www.njcourts.gov/attorneys/opinions

C) PRACTICE & ADMINISTRATIVE CONTEXT — COURT RELIANCE ON AFFIDAVITS

New Jersey Rules of Court — Civil Practice
Provides the broader procedural framework within which affidavits of service are reviewed, challenged, and relied upon in civil, family, and Special Civil Part matters.
https://www.njcourts.gov/rules

New Jersey Judiciary — E-Filing and Court Records
Illustrates how affidavits of service are submitted, reviewed, and preserved as part of the official court record relied upon for jurisdiction and enforcement.
https://www.njcourts.gov/ecourts

EDITORIAL NOTE ON USE

This article focuses on the court-rule–driven framework governing affidavits of service in New Jersey courts, including proof requirements, credibility standards, and jurisdictional consequences of defective affidavits. The authorities cited above illustrate how New Jersey courts assess service validity, affidavit sufficiency, and due-process compliance. They are provided to support legal analysis and compliance assessment, not to offer procedural or tactical service instruction.

Directions to Our New Jersey Office

For access to our New Jersey office at 101 Hudson Street, 21st Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey 07302, please click the embedded map and call ahead to be added to building security for entry. To avoid delays, bring all necessary documents and payment so your visit can be handled efficiently upon arrival. Undisputed Legal Inc. maintains offices in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Texas, Illinois, and Washington, D.C., and provides legal support services in all 50 states and over 120 countries worldwide.