Serve The Boeing Company: 35-State Multi-State RA Architecture

As of 2026, The Boeing Company is a Delaware corporation maintaining active foreign-qualification filings in thirty-five states with Corporation Service Company designated as the registered agent across the entire architecture, supporting service of process in any forum state through a single uniform registered-agent network rather than through corporate-headquarters address.

Service of process on The Boeing Company is determined by where the matter is filed, not by where Boeing’s principal executive offices are located in any given calendar year. In nearly every state where Boeing maintains an active corporate filing, the registered agent of record is Corporation Service Company at that state’s CSC office address. Boeing is incorporated in Delaware (Delaware filing 0367504, January 23, 1959), with the state-of-incorporation registered agent at CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service, 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808-1674. The architecture is the load-bearing question for service: the entity to be served is The Boeing Company; the address is the state-specific Corporation Service Company registered agent for the forum state of the matter. Operating-site addresses, corporate-headquarters addresses, and Boeing-affiliated commercial premises are not authorized service venues for the corporate entity, regardless of how prominent those addresses appear in Boeing public communications or in trade-press references to Boeing operations.

For matters filed in New York federal districts (SDNY, EDNY, NDNY, WDNY) or in New York state court, service on The Boeing Company routes to Corporation Service Company at 80 State Street, Albany, NY 12207-2541, the registered-agent designation under New York foreign-qualification filing 116600 dated January 22, 1959. Counsel managing high-volume New York commercial-litigation matters can reach Undisputed Legal’s New York metro coordination desk at (212) 203-8001 for pre-dispatch verification of the current Boeing registered-agent designation, multi-state coordination when matters span more than one Boeing-qualified state, and same-day or next-day dispatch coordination across the Boeing thirty-five-state foreign-qualification architecture.

Undisputed Legal coordinates Boeing Company service across the Delaware state of incorporation and the thirty-five verified foreign-qualification states, with state-specific registered-agent verification adapted to each forum state’s substantive procedural framework. To order service on The Boeing Company in any forum state — federal or state, in Delaware as the state of incorporation or in any of the thirty-five active foreign-qualification jurisdictions — call (800) 774-6922 or use the link below.

Order The Boeing Company Service Now

Why Service on Boeing Is Architecturally Distinctive

The Boeing Company’s service-of-process architecture is unusual among multi-state defendant entities of comparable scale. Two structural facts distinguish Boeing from the patchwork-registered-agent pattern that characterizes most large multi-state corporate defendants. First, the entity itself is a Delaware corporation with a continuous corporate-filing record going back to the 1934 establishment of the Accurint legal-entity record, and the state of incorporation is settled as the canonical forum for any matter elected at the state-of-incorporation level. Second, Boeing’s foreign-qualification architecture across the thirty-five verified states uses a single registered-agent firm — Corporation Service Company — at the state-specific CSC office address in each state. The combination produces a service-of-process profile of unusual operational predictability for counsel preparing matters that may be filed in any of more than thirty jurisdictions.

Delaware State of Incorporation — The Canonical Forum

The Boeing Company is incorporated in Delaware, with corporate-filing record at the Delaware Department of State Division of Corporations under filing number 0367504, dated January 23, 1959. Delaware General Corporation Law § 321 (8 Del. C. § 321) governs service of process on Delaware corporations served at the state of incorporation: service is delivered to the registered agent designated in the corporation’s Delaware filing record. The registered agent for The Boeing Company in Delaware is CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service at 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808-1674. The “Lawyers Incorporating Service” variant of the CSC family is the specific designation in the Boeing Delaware filing — counsel and dispatch coordinators identifying the Delaware registered agent must reference the variant identification, not the unqualified “Corporation Service Company” designation that applies in foreign-qualification states.

For any matter venued in Delaware Chancery Court, Delaware Superior Court, or the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, service at the Delaware registered agent satisfies the statutory requirement under both Delaware state law and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h)(1)(B). For any out-of-state matter where counsel elects to serve at the state of incorporation rather than the forum state — a common election for federal-court matters where the federal-court venue is in a state that is not in the Boeing thirty-five-state foreign-qualification architecture — service at the Delaware registered agent under FRCP 4(h)(1)(B) reaches Boeing through the canonical state-of-incorporation route. The DGCL § 132 requirement that every Delaware corporation maintain a registered agent within Delaware is satisfied by the CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service designation, and the Wilmington office address has remained continuous through the entity’s modern corporate history.

Multi-State Foreign-Qualification Architecture — Preview

Beyond Delaware, Boeing maintains active foreign-qualification filings across thirty-five additional states with verified Accurint filing records as of the May 9, 2026 verification cycle. The thirty-five states span every U.S. census region — Northeast (NY, NH, MA, CT, RI, ME, VT), Mid-Atlantic (VA, WV, NC, GA, FL), Midwest (IN, KS, NE, ND, SD, IA, KY, TN, MS, AL), Mountain (CO, MT, NV, NM, UT, WY, ID), Pacific (WA, OR, AK, HI), and Southwest (AZ). The earliest active foreign-qualification record is the Washington filing dated August 30, 1934 (filing number 178005030) — the same year as the Accurint legal-entity establishment record. The most recent active foreign-qualification record is the Arizona filing dated July 16, 2018 (filing number F00218887). The architectural depth — nearly a century of continuous corporate-compliance filings across more than thirty jurisdictions — is itself the editorial centerpiece of the Boeing service-of-process profile, developed in detail in the next section.

Boeing’s service-of-process profile is defined by its registered-agent network, not by its operating sites — the entity to be served is The Boeing Company, the address is the state-specific Corporation Service Company office, and the corporate-headquarters address in any given calendar year is operationally irrelevant to the service-of-process question.

The Thirty-Five-State Multi-State Registered Agent Architecture

The Boeing thirty-five-state foreign-qualification architecture is the operational core of the service-of-process profile. Three structural facts distinguish the architecture from the patchwork-registered-agent pattern that characterizes most large multi-state defendant entities: a unified Corporation Service Company designation across the verified states; the resulting service-of-process predictability for counsel preparing matters in multiple jurisdictions; and the filing-depth evidence of nearly a century of continuous corporate-compliance discipline. Each is a structural fact about how Boeing is service-able, not a promotional characterization of Boeing’s compliance practices. The operational implication is that counsel filing in any of the thirty-five verified states has a clean answer at the state’s Corporation Service Company office, and the answer is consistent across the architecture in a way that is unusual at this scale.

Unified Corporation Service Company Designation Across Verified States

Across all thirty-five verified foreign-qualification states, Boeing’s registered-agent designation is Corporation Service Company (CSC), with the Delaware state-of-incorporation registered agent identified as the closely-related “CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service” variant. The unified designation is operationally significant for counsel preparing Boeing matters: the registered-agent firm identification does not change between states, eliminating one variable from the pre-dispatch verification step. Counsel preparing a matter venued in Washington routes service to CSC at 300 Deschutes Way SW, Suite 208, Tumwater, WA 98501-7719. Counsel preparing a matter venued in New York routes service to CSC at 80 State Street, Albany, NY 12207-2541. Counsel preparing a matter venued in Florida routes service to CSC at 1201 Hays Street, Tallahassee, FL 32301-2699. The pattern holds across all thirty-five states, with state-specific CSC office addresses but uniform registered-agent firm identification.

The contrast with patchwork-registered-agent defendants is operationally consequential. Many large multi-state corporate defendants use a mix of registered-agent firms — Corporation Service Company in some states, CT Corporation System in others, The Prentice-Hall Corporation System in still others, and occasionally law firms or internal corporate officers in selected jurisdictions. The patchwork pattern requires counsel to verify the specific registered-agent firm at each state-of-qualification record before any dispatch event, with a higher pre-dispatch verification burden and a higher rejected-return rate when source documentation references the wrong firm. Boeing’s unified Corporation Service Company architecture eliminates the firm-identification verification step at the state level — counsel verifies the state-specific CSC office address against the current state Secretary-of-State filing record, but the firm identification holds. The architecture is unusual at the Boeing scale (thirty-five states) and reflects a deliberate corporate-secretarial discipline that is itself worth flagging in any service-of-process editorial about the entity.

Service-of-Process Predictability vs. Patchwork Defendants

The operational implication of the unified Corporation Service Company architecture is service-of-process predictability that is unusual at the Boeing scale. Counsel preparing a Boeing matter in any of the thirty-five verified foreign-qualification states has a structurally clean answer at the pre-dispatch stage: the registered-agent firm is Corporation Service Company; the registered-agent address is the state-specific CSC office; the service path is Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h)(1)(B) for federal-court matters, the state’s general corporation-service statute for state-court matters, and the venue-state-specific substituted-service path through the Secretary of State or Department of State if direct service on the registered agent is unavailable.

The predictability matters most for counsel preparing matters that may be filed in multiple states or where the venue selection has not been finalized at the time of pre-dispatch coordination. A multi-jurisdictional commercial-litigation matter against Boeing that may be filed in Washington (the state of Boeing’s deepest historical operational presence), in New York (the largest commercial-litigation venue), in Delaware (the state of incorporation), or in any of the other thirty-two verified states has the same registered-agent firm identification at every venue: Corporation Service Company at that state’s CSC office. The single-firm pattern reduces the pre-dispatch coordination burden compared to a patchwork-registered-agent defendant where each candidate venue would require separate registered-agent firm verification and separate dispatch-network coordination. For matters spanning multiple Boeing-qualified states — class actions, multi-district litigation, consolidated commercial matters — the architecture enables a unified dispatch event coordinated across multiple state CSC offices on a single engagement schedule.

Filing Depth — Nearly a Century of Continuous Compliance

The Boeing thirty-five-state foreign-qualification architecture is the result of nearly a century of continuous corporate-compliance discipline rather than a recent reorganization. The earliest active foreign-qualification record in the verified Accurint pull is the Washington filing dated August 30, 1934 — the same year as the Accurint legal-entity establishment record. The Massachusetts filing (910425694) dates to March 25, 1965. The New York filing (116600) dates to January 22, 1959. The Florida filing (808636) dates to August 2, 1951. The Indiana filing (1989050953) and several other 07/19/1934-dated filings (Alabama 000850930, Maine 20070436F, Montana F042920, North Dakota 0000013405) reflect a coordinated initial multi-state foreign-qualification cycle in mid-1934, contemporaneous with the entity’s modern corporate-record establishment.

The most recent active foreign-qualification record is the Arizona filing dated July 16, 2018 (filing number F00218887). Between the 1934 initial cycle and the 2018 Arizona addition, the architecture grew through gradual state-by-state additions reflecting Boeing’s expanding multi-state operational presence over more than eight decades. The continuous-filing record matters operationally because each state’s foreign-qualification filing is the controlling source for that state’s registered-agent designation. Counsel preparing a matter in any of the thirty-five verified states pulls the state-specific filing record at pre-dispatch and verifies that the Corporation Service Company designation and the state-specific CSC office address remain current. The continuous-filing record means the architecture is not subject to recent-reorganization volatility — the registered-agent designations have been stable across the entire architecture for years to decades, with the most recent state-specific changes reflecting CSC office relocations within a state rather than registered-agent firm transitions between states.

Operational Interaction with the Tier 2 Verification Layer

The thirty-five-state Tier 1 routing matrix presented in Section 5 is the verified foreign-qualification record for The Boeing Company as of the May 9, 2026 Accurint pull. The Tier 1 architecture is dispatch-ready: counsel and dispatch coordinators can route Boeing service to the state-specific Corporation Service Company office address for any of the thirty-five states with confidence that the registered-agent firm designation and the state-specific office address are recorded in the verified pull. The architecture sits on top of a Tier 2 verification layer that operates differently and requires explicit pre-dispatch attention for matters venued outside the Tier 1 footprint.

Tier 2 states are jurisdictions where Boeing maintains operating presence — facilities, employees, commercial relationships — without a corresponding Accurint Corporation Filings record returning an active foreign-qualification entry. California (where Boeing operates facilities at El Segundo, Long Beach, Huntington Beach, and Sunnyvale), Texas (Houston operating site), Illinois (legacy headquarters location through the early 2020s), and South Carolina (Charleston 787 final-assembly facility) are operating-presence states for which the verified May 2026 Accurint pull did not surface foreign-qualification records. The operational consequence: matters venued in any Tier 2 state require a current state Secretary of State foreign-qualification pull at the pre-dispatch stage to establish whether Boeing maintains an active filing in that state and, if so, what the registered-agent designation is.

The pattern observed across the verified Tier 1 architecture supports a working expectation about Tier 2 results: across all thirty-five Tier 1 states, the registered-agent firm designation is uniformly Corporation Service Company (with the Delaware variant identified as CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service). Counsel obtaining a Tier 2 state-SoS pull should anticipate, but verify against the actual filing record rather than assume, that the same Corporation Service Company designation appears at the state-specific CSC office address. The pre-dispatch verification step confirms or refutes the working expectation against the actual state-of-qualification record, and the verification result is recorded in the affidavit-of-service file as part of the engagement’s evidentiary documentation.

For matters venued in any state — Tier 1 or Tier 2 — counsel preparing federal-court litigation has an operational election available under FRCP 4(h)(1)(B): service at the Delaware state-of-incorporation registered agent (CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service at 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington) satisfies the federal service requirement regardless of the venue district’s Tier 1 or Tier 2 status. The Delaware route is the structural fallback for matters venued in Tier 2 states where the state-SoS verification surfaces no active Boeing foreign-qualification, and is also available as an alternative election for matters venued in Tier 1 states where counsel finds the Delaware state-of-incorporation route procedurally more efficient than the venue-state foreign-qualification route. Counsel selects between the venue-state foreign-qualification route, the Delaware state-of-incorporation route, and any state-law fallback under FRCP 4(h)(1)(A); Undisputed Legal executes the elected route at the verified registered-agent designation.

Boeing Subsidiary Architecture and Caption Discipline

The Boeing Company has no separately-serviceable named subsidiaries with active independent foreign-qualification filings as of the verified Accurint pull. The corporate-structure question is operationally consequential because Boeing operates through internal divisions and operating units that are routinely referenced in business and aviation media, in SEC filings, and in trade-press coverage of Boeing operations — but those operating units are not separately-qualified legal entities and do not have independent registered-agent designations. Caption discipline matters: a matter naming a Boeing operating unit as the captioned defendant routes service to The Boeing Company at the state-specific Corporation Service Company registered agent for the forum state, not to any operating-unit-specific address.

Boeing Operating Units Are Not Separately Qualified

The most prominent Boeing operating units — Boeing Defense, Space & Security; Boeing Commercial Airplanes; Boeing Global Services — are internal operating divisions of The Boeing Company, not separately-incorporated legal entities. These names appear in Boeing public communications, in SEC segment reporting, in commercial contracts, and in trade-press coverage of Boeing operations, but they do not appear in state Secretary-of-State filing records as separately-qualified foreign corporations. The verified Accurint pull surfaces no separate foreign-qualification filings under the Boeing Defense, Space & Security; Boeing Commercial Airplanes; or Boeing Global Services designations in any state. Service for any matter naming one of these operating units as the captioned defendant routes to The Boeing Company at the state-specific CSC registered agent for the forum state of the matter.

The captioning question for matters arising from operating-unit conduct is a counsel decision rather than a service-of-process decision. Counsel preparing a complaint that arises from conduct attributable to Boeing Defense, Space & Security operations may caption the defendant as The Boeing Company (the legal person) and reference the operating-unit designation in the substantive allegations, or counsel may caption the operating-unit designation directly while accepting that service still routes through The Boeing Company’s registered-agent network. Either captioning approach delivers process to the same legal person at the same registered-agent address — but the operationally clean approach for service-of-process purposes is to caption The Boeing Company directly, which aligns the captioning with the registered-agent designation and avoids any procedural ambiguity about which entity is the named defendant.

Historical Merged Entities — No Independent Filings

Several Boeing-affiliated entities historically operated as separately-incorporated companies before merger into The Boeing Company. The verified Accurint pull surfaces references to Boeing Satellite Systems, Inc.; Boeing Helena, Inc.; Boeing-SVS, Inc.; Boeing LTS, Inc.; Conquest, Inc.; Kestrel Enterprises, Inc.; and Boeing Commercial Airplanes Charleston as merged-into or operating-unit references rather than as separately-qualified foreign corporations with independent registered-agent designations. The merged-into status means each of these historical entities is now part of The Boeing Company as a single legal person, with no separate state-of-incorporation filing or foreign-qualification record. Service for any matter naming one of these historical entities — whether for legacy litigation arising from the entity’s pre-merger conduct or for matters where the historical name is referenced in older corporate records — routes to The Boeing Company at the state-specific CSC registered agent for the forum state.

The Boeing Employees’ Credit Union (BECU) Is NOT a Boeing Legal Subsidiary

The Boeing Employees’ Credit Union (BECU) is a separately-organized Washington-state credit union, not a legal subsidiary of The Boeing Company. Despite the entity name, BECU operates under federal credit-union regulatory framework as an independent financial cooperative serving Boeing employees and other eligible members. Service for any matter against BECU routes to BECU’s own registered-agent designation in Washington or in any other state where BECU maintains independent foreign-qualification — not through The Boeing Company’s registered-agent architecture. Counsel preparing a matter that names “Boeing Employees’ Credit Union” or “BECU” as the captioned defendant must verify BECU’s independent registered-agent designation, which is structurally distinct from The Boeing Company’s Corporation Service Company architecture.

Tier 1 Routing Matrix — Thirty-Five Verified Foreign-Qualification States

The Tier 1 routing matrix below presents the verified Accurint foreign-qualification record for The Boeing Company across the thirty-five states with active filings as of the May 9, 2026 verification cycle. Each row carries the state-specific filing number for verification provenance, the filing date establishing the filing’s vintage, the registered-agent firm designation (Corporation Service Company in nearly all states, with Delaware identifying the CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service variant), and the registered-agent office address. For every state in this matrix, service of process on The Boeing Company in any state-court or federal-court matter venued in that state routes to the registered-agent address in the corresponding row.

State	Status	Filing #	Filed	Registered Agent	RA Address
AK	ACTIVE	5735F	01/10/1978	Corporation Service Company	8585 Old Dairy Rd Ste 208, Juneau, AK 99801-8094
AL	N/A [VERIFY VIA AL SoS PRE-DISPATCH]	000850930	07/19/1934	Corporation Service Company Inc	641 S Lawrence St, Montgomery, AL 36104-5809
AZ	ACTIVE	F00218887	07/16/2018	Corporation Service Company	7955 S Priest Dr Ste 102, Tempe, AZ 85284-1050
CO	ACTIVE	19871034749	01/17/1964	Corporation Service Company	1900 W Littleton Blvd, Littleton, CO 80120-2023
CT	ACTIVE	0533783	05/18/1983	Corporation Service Company	225 Asylum St Fl 20, Hartford, CT 06103-1532
DE	ACTIVE	0367504	01/23/1959	CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service	251 Little Falls Dr, Wilmington, DE 19808-1674
FL	ACTIVE	808636	08/02/1951	Corporation Service Company	1201 Hays St, Tallahassee, FL 32301-2699
GA	ACTIVE	H851782	01/04/1978	Corporation Service Company	2 Sun Ct Ste 400, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092-2865
HI	ACTIVE	3600 F1	01/29/1973	Corporation Service Company	1003 Bishop St Ste 1600, Honolulu, HI 96813-6452
IA	ACTIVE	233286	10/20/1999	Corporation Service Company	505 5th Ave Ste 729, Des Moines, IA 50309-2318
ID	ACTIVE	0000400107	10/20/1999	Corporation Service Company	1305 12th Ave Rd, Nampa, ID 83686-6003
IN	ACTIVE	1989050953	07/19/1934	Corporation Service Company	135 N Pennsylvania St Ste 1610, Indianapolis, IN 46204-2448
KS	ACTIVE	7044654	04/21/1938	Corporation Service Company	1100 SW Wanamaker Rd Ste 103, Topeka, KS 66604-3805
KY	ACTIVE	0257466	04/18/1989	Corporation Service Company	315 High St, Frankfort, KY 40601-2110
MA	ACTIVE	910425694	03/25/1965	Corporation Service Company	84 State St, Boston, MA 02109-2202
ME	ACTIVE	20070436 F	07/19/1934	Corporation Service Company	45 Memorial Cir, Augusta, ME 04330-6400
MS	ACTIVE	411103	05/27/1981	Corporation Service Company	109 Executive Dr Ste 3, Madison, MS 39110-8497
MT	ACTIVE	F042920	07/19/1934	Corporation Service Company	PO Box 1691, Helena, MT 59624-1691
NC	ACTIVE	0509827	10/20/1999	Corporation Service Company	2626 Glenwood Ave Ste 550, Raleigh, NC 27608-1370
ND	ACTIVE	0000013405	07/19/1934	Corporation Service Company	418 N 2nd St, Bismarck, ND 58501-3826
NE	ACTIVE	0284238	01/17/1964	CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company	233 S 13th St Ste 1900, Lincoln, NE 68508-2000
NH	ACTIVE	326873	11/18/1999	Corporation Service Company	10 Ferry St S313, Concord, NH 03301-5022
NM	ACTIVE	0313825	07/20/1954	Corporation Service Company	125 Lincoln Ave Ste 223, Santa Fe, NM 87501-2053
NV	ACTIVE	C3628-1978	07/17/1978	Corporation Service Company	112 N Curry St, Carson City, NV 89703-4934
NY	ACTIVE	116600	01/22/1959	Corporation Service Company	80 State St, Albany, NY 12207-2541
OR	ACTIVE	781328	03/05/1964	Corporation Service Company	1127 Broadway St NE Ste 310, Salem, OR 97301-1143
RI	ACTIVE	109454	11/30/1999	Corporation Service Company	222 Jefferson Blvd Ste 200, Warwick, RI 02888-3855
SD	ACTIVE	FB001706	08/17/1961	Corporation Service Company	503 S Pierre St, Pierre, SD 57501-4522
TN	ACTIVE	000036029	10/04/1973	Corporation Service Company	2908 Poston Ave, Nashville, TN 37203-1309
UT	ACTIVE	5685273-0143	07/08/2004	Corporation Service Company	15 W South Temple Ste 600, Salt Lake City, UT 84101-1536
VA	ACTIVE	F0148454	12/16/2005	Corporation Service Company	100 Shockoe Slip Fl 2, Richmond, VA 23219-4100
VT	N/A [VERIFY VIA VT SoS PRE-DISPATCH]	0071259	11/23/1999	Corporation Service Company	100 N Main St Ste 2, Barre, VT 05641-4162
WA	ACTIVE	178005030	08/30/1934	Corporation Service Company	300 Deschutes Way SW Ste 208, Tumwater, WA 98501-7719
WV	ACTIVE	3232	04/07/1972	Corporation Service Company	808 Greenbrier St, Charleston, WV 25311-1527
WY	ACTIVE	1980-000091004	11/05/1962	Corporation Service Company	1821 Logan Ave, Cheyenne, WY 82001-5007

Two states in the Tier 1 matrix carry Status flags requiring pre-dispatch verification. Alabama and Vermont show Status N/A in the Accurint Corporation Filings module — counsel and dispatch coordinators preparing matters for service in either state should obtain a current Secretary of State foreign-qualification record before dispatch to confirm that the registered-agent designation remains active and that no recent administrative action has affected the filing’s status. The N/A status is not a defect in the underlying filing record but a flag from the Accurint module that the verification source returned an indeterminate status code; the corrective action is a direct state-SoS pull rather than a substantive change to the routing matrix.

Tier 2 supplementary note — states not in the verified Accurint pull. Boeing maintains operating sites in numerous states beyond the thirty-five enumerated in the Tier 1 routing matrix, including but not limited to California (where Boeing operates facilities at El Segundo, Long Beach, Huntington Beach, and Sunnyvale), Texas (where Boeing maintains a Houston operating site), Illinois (Boeing’s legacy headquarters location through the early 2020s), and South Carolina (where Boeing operates the 787 final-assembly facility at Charleston). The verified Accurint Corporation Filings pull as of the May 9, 2026 verification cycle did not return active foreign-qualification records for these states. For service in any state not enumerated in the Tier 1 routing matrix above, counsel should obtain a current Secretary of State foreign-qualification record before dispatch and route service to the verified registered-agent designation in that state. Operating presence is not the same as foreign-qualification status, and the foreign-qualification record is the load-bearing source for the registered-agent designation that controls service of process.

Where to Serve The Boeing Company — Multi-State Mechanics

Service of process on The Boeing Company proceeds under one of several procedural frameworks depending on the venue state and the underlying claim type. The framework selected at the pre-dispatch stage controls the registered-agent address, the substituted-service path if the registered-agent designation is unavailable, and the affidavit-of-service form prescribed by the venue court.

Federal Forum — FRCP 4(h)(1)(A) and 4(h)(1)(B)

Federal-court matters against The Boeing Company proceed under FRCP 4(h)(1), which authorizes service on a corporation by either (A) following the state law for serving a summons in the state where the district court is located or where service is made; or (B) by delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to an officer, a managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process. The (A) and (B) routes provide federal plaintiffs with operational flexibility: a plaintiff filing in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia may serve under Virginia state law (option A) or by delivery to the Boeing registered agent at any state where Boeing maintains an active foreign-qualification (option B), including Delaware as the state of incorporation. The election between (A) and (B) is a counsel decision based on the procedural framework most efficient for the matter; service on Corporation Service Company at any of the thirty-five state-specific CSC office addresses (or at CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service in Wilmington, DE) satisfies FRCP 4(h)(1)(B) for federal-court matters in any federal district.

Delaware State Forum — DGCL § 321

For matters venued in Delaware Chancery Court, Delaware Superior Court, or other Delaware state-court forums, Delaware General Corporation Law § 321 (8 Del. C. § 321) governs service of process on a Delaware corporation. Service is delivered to the registered agent designated in the corporation’s Delaware filing record at the registered-agent’s Delaware office address. For The Boeing Company, the Delaware registered agent is CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service at 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808-1674. The DGCL § 132 statutory requirement that every Delaware corporation maintain a registered agent within Delaware is satisfied by the CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service designation, and service at the Wilmington office address satisfies the statutory service requirement under DGCL § 321 for any Delaware state-court matter against The Boeing Company.

New York Forum — NY BCL § 306, § 304, and CPLR § 311(a)(1)

For matters venued in New York state courts against The Boeing Company as a foreign corporation foreign-qualified in New York under filing 116600, CPLR § 311(a)(1) governs direct service on the registered agent: service is delivered to an officer, director, managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or law to receive service. The registered agent designated in the New York foreign-qualification filing is Corporation Service Company at 80 State Street, Albany, NY 12207-2541; service on Corporation Service Company at the Albany office address satisfies the statutory service requirement against The Boeing Company in New York state-court matters. NY Business Corporation Law § 306 supplies the parallel framework for service on the registered agent of a foreign corporation in New York. NY BCL § 304 designates the New York Department of State as the substituted-service agent for foreign corporations doing business in New York, providing a backup substituted-service path through the Department of State at One Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12231-0001 if direct service on the registered agent is unavailable.

Other State Forums — The Pattern

For matters venued in any of the other state courts where Boeing maintains an active foreign-qualification under the Tier 1 routing matrix above, the pattern holds: each state’s general corporation-service statute permits service on the corporation through the registered agent designated in the state’s foreign-qualification filing record. The state-specific statute names vary — California Corporations Code § 2110 / § 2111, Florida Statutes § 48.091, Texas Business Organizations Code § 5.255, and analogous provisions in each of the verified states — but the operational framework is the same: service is delivered to Corporation Service Company at the state-specific CSC office address, which satisfies the venue state’s statutory service requirement. Counsel preparing a matter in any of the thirty-five verified states pulls the state-specific CSC office address from the Tier 1 routing matrix above and confirms the address against the current state Secretary of State filing record at pre-dispatch. The Boeing Company corporate office in any city is not an authorized service address under any of these state-specific statutes; the authorized service address is the registered-agent designation recorded in the controlling state-of-qualification filing.

Scope of Services

Undisputed Legal delivers service of process. Undisputed Legal does not practice law. The boundary applies with particular rigor to multi-jurisdictional Boeing matters because the framework selection — between federal-court FRCP 4(h)(1)(A) state-law-of-forum-state and FRCP 4(h)(1)(B) registered-agent service, between Delaware-state-of-incorporation forum and a foreign-qualification forum state, between direct service on the registered agent and substituted service through the Secretary of State — is a legal question answered by counsel and by the procedural posture of the matter, not by a process-service vendor.

Counsel determines the entity. Counsel determines the path. Counsel determines the captioning. Undisputed Legal serves at the registered agent confirmed in current state-of-organization or state-of-qualification filings. The specific tasks within counsel’s scope and outside Undisputed Legal’s scope: selecting the captioned defendant entity (The Boeing Company versus a Boeing operating-unit caption); selecting the venue state for the matter and the corresponding registered-agent address; selecting between FRCP 4(h)(1)(A) and 4(h)(1)(B) for federal-court matters; selecting between direct registered-agent service and Secretary-of-State substituted service for state-court matters where the direct route is unavailable; drafting the complaint and any amended complaints; interpreting the Boeing foreign-qualification filing record for any state where the Tier 1 routing matrix flags require pre-dispatch verification.

The specific tasks within Undisputed Legal’s scope: verifying the current registered-agent designation for The Boeing Company in the venue state via the current state Secretary-of-State or Department-of-State filing record at the pre-dispatch stage; coordinating dispatch to the registered-agent address; executing in-person delivery of the summons and complaint or subpoena to an authorized agent at the registered-agent location; recording the service event with GPS-verified timestamping and on-site documentation; preparing the affidavit-of-service return in the form prescribed by the venue court; coordinating multi-state dispatch tours where the matter requires service at more than one Boeing-qualified state.

The interaction between counsel’s scope and Undisputed Legal’s scope at the pre-dispatch stage is the entity-verification handshake: counsel provides the captioned defendant entity (The Boeing Company) and the venue state for the matter; Undisputed Legal verifies the current Corporation Service Company office address for that state against the verified Tier 1 routing matrix and the current state-SoS filing record, and confirms the operational service path. If the verification step surfaces an issue — the state’s CSC office address has relocated since the most recent verification cycle, the state’s foreign-qualification status has changed (relevant for the AL and VT N/A flags), or the state is one of the gap states not in the verified Tier 1 routing matrix — Undisputed Legal flags the issue back to counsel for the legal-procedural decision the issue requires.

Counsel makes the legal-procedural calls about which framework applies, which entity is captioned, and which state controls; Undisputed Legal executes the dispatch at the verified registered agent for the state counsel selected, with GPS-verified affidavit return formatted to the venue court’s prescribed form. The boundary is the structural safeguard against unauthorized practice of law.

How Undisputed Legal Approaches Boeing Service

The Undisputed Legal operational approach to Boeing Company service follows a five-phase protocol calibrated to the multi-state foreign-qualification architecture and to the unified Corporation Service Company registered-agent designation pattern across the thirty-five verified states.

Phase 1: Pre-dispatch verification. Undisputed Legal confirms the current Corporation Service Company office address for the venue state against the verified Tier 1 routing matrix and against the current state Secretary-of-State or Department-of-State filing record. For Delaware as the state of incorporation, the verification confirms the CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service designation at 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington. For each of the thirty-four foreign-qualification states with a verified Tier 1 entry, the verification confirms the state-specific CSC office address. For Alabama and Vermont (carrying Status N/A flags in the verified pull), the verification includes a direct state-SoS confirmation of current status. For any state outside the Tier 1 routing matrix, the verification establishes whether Boeing maintains active foreign-qualification in that state and identifies the registered-agent designation if so.

Phase 2: Dispatch coordination. Undisputed Legal coordinates the dispatch package — the summons, the complaint or subpoena, any accompanying procedural documents required by the venue court, and the statutory service fee where applicable — and assigns the dispatch to a process server at the appropriate location for the venue-state CSC office address. The unified CSC architecture across the verified states enables dispatch coordination through Undisputed Legal’s affiliated process-service network in each state, with the same operational pattern across every venue: confirm the CSC office hours, schedule the in-person delivery within business-hour windows, document the service event with GPS-coordinate verification.

Phase 3: GPS-verified attempts. The process server executes in-person delivery of the dispatch package to an authorized agent at the Corporation Service Company office in the venue state. Every attempt is logged with geo-coordinates per Undisputed Legal operational standard, regardless of whether the attempt results in successful delivery or in a return for re-attempt. GPS-coordinate verification establishes the timestamped location of every attempt for evidentiary purposes, supporting the affidavit-of-service return against any subsequent challenge to the sufficiency of the service event.

Phase 4: Photographic documentation. The process server records contemporaneous photographic documentation of the CSC office facade and any door-tag or building-directory confirmation that the office is the registered-agent designation of record for the venue state. The photographic record is a supplementary evidentiary anchor for the affidavit-of-service return, useful for matters where the venue court’s prescribed affidavit form requires or accepts photographic confirmation of the service location.

Phase 5: Evidence-grade affidavit return. Undisputed Legal prepares the affidavit-of-service return in the form prescribed by the venue court — federal-court matters use the FRCP-prescribed return-of-service form; Delaware state-court matters use the Delaware-prescribed affidavit form; New York state-court matters use the CPLR-prescribed affidavit form; out-of-state matters use the venue-state-prescribed form. The affidavit return incorporates the GPS-coordinate verification data, the timestamp record, the recipient identification at the CSC office, the description of the dispatch package delivered, and where applicable the photographic documentation. The completed affidavit return supports the service event against any subsequent Rule 12(b)(5) motion to quash or motion challenging the sufficiency of service.

Common Pitfalls in Boeing Service

The Boeing Company service path is straightforward when the entity-disambiguation analysis, the venue-state verification, and the Corporation Service Company office-address confirmation at the pre-dispatch stage produce a clean result. The pitfalls below are the common departures from the clean path, and the procedural cost of each pitfall is material: a rejected-service return, a remediation cycle, a Rule 12(b)(5) motion target, or in matters approaching a statute-of-limitations deadline, a timeliness consequence on the underlying filing.

Pitfall 1: Serving a Boeing Operating Unit Address

The most common pitfall in Boeing service is dispatching service to a Boeing operating-site address — the Boeing Defense, Space & Security campus, a Boeing Commercial Airplanes assembly facility, a Boeing Global Services regional office — under the assumption that the operating-site address is an authorized service location for the operating unit named in the captioning. Boeing operating units are not separately-qualified legal entities; service for any matter naming a Boeing operating unit as the captioned defendant routes to The Boeing Company at the state-specific Corporation Service Company registered agent for the forum state. Process delivered to a Boeing operating-site address — even if accepted by an on-site facilities or security staff member — does not satisfy the statutory service requirement against The Boeing Company under FRCP 4(h)(1)(B), DGCL § 321, or the parallel state-court statutes. The corrected service path routes to the verified state-specific CSC office address per the Tier 1 routing matrix.

Pitfall 2: Confusing The Boeing Company with The Boeing Employees’ Credit Union (BECU)

The Boeing Employees’ Credit Union (BECU) is a separately-organized Washington-state credit union, not a legal subsidiary of The Boeing Company. Despite the entity name, BECU operates under federal credit-union regulatory framework as an independent financial cooperative serving Boeing employees and other eligible members. Service for any matter against BECU — credit-union-related claims, account-administration matters, financial-services litigation arising from BECU’s cooperative-banking operations — routes to BECU’s own registered-agent designation, not to The Boeing Company’s Corporation Service Company architecture. Counsel preparing a matter that names “Boeing Employees’ Credit Union” or “BECU” as the captioned defendant must verify BECU’s independent registered-agent designation at the pre-dispatch stage; misdirecting BECU service to The Boeing Company’s CSC architecture produces a rejected-service return because Corporation Service Company does not represent BECU.

Pitfall 3: Defaulting to a Corporate Headquarters Address for Service

The Boeing Company’s principal executive offices have been associated in different historical periods with different cities, and source documentation prepared in different decades may reference different headquarters addresses. Source documentation more than three to five years old is particularly susceptible to referencing legacy headquarters locations. The corporate-headquarters address — in any historical period — is not an authorized service address for The Boeing Company under any of the state-specific service-of-process statutes. Service does not go to the corporate headquarters; service goes to the state-specific Corporation Service Company registered agent for the forum state of the matter. The CSC architecture is the operationally relevant address; the corporate-headquarters location is not.

Pitfall 4: Assuming Nationwide Registered-Agent Uniformity at a Single Address

The unified Corporation Service Company designation across the thirty-five verified states is sometimes misread as evidence that a single CSC office address is the universal Boeing service location. The CSC firm identification is uniform; the specific CSC office address is state-specific. Service on Corporation Service Company at the Wilmington Delaware office address (251 Little Falls Drive) does not satisfy the New York foreign-qualification service requirement; the New York CSC office is at 80 State Street, Albany. Service at the Wilmington office for a New York state-court matter produces a rejected return because Corporation Service Company in Delaware does not accept process for The Boeing Company’s New York foreign-qualification filing. The corrected dispatch routes to the state-specific CSC office address per the Tier 1 routing matrix; counsel verifying service-of-process targets across multiple Boeing-qualified states must verify the state-specific address for each forum, not a single nationwide CSC office.

Pitfall 5: Skipping Foreign-Qualification Verification for States Outside the Tier 1 Matrix

Boeing maintains operating sites in numerous states beyond the thirty-five enumerated in the Tier 1 routing matrix. Operating presence is not the same as foreign-qualification status. Counsel preparing a matter venued in a state where Boeing maintains operating sites but where the verified Accurint pull did not return an active foreign-qualification record (California, Texas, Illinois, South Carolina, and other operating-presence states) must obtain a current state Secretary of State foreign-qualification record before dispatch. The presence of Boeing employees, facilities, or commercial relationships in a state does not establish that the corporate entity has an authorized registered-agent designation for service of process in that state. Foreign-qualification status is the load-bearing source for the registered-agent designation that controls service. Skipping the foreign-qualification verification step produces a service event that may not satisfy the venue state’s statutory service requirement, even if the dispatch reaches a Boeing operating-site address.

Pitfall 6: Treating Boeing Operating Unit Names as Separate Defendants

Boeing Defense, Space & Security; Boeing Commercial Airplanes; Boeing Global Services; and other Boeing operating-unit designations are not separately-incorporated legal entities. Captioning a complaint to “Boeing Defense, Space & Security” as the named defendant does not create a separate legal person from The Boeing Company; the operating unit is a division of the corporate entity, not a co-defendant. The captioning question is operationally inert for service-of-process purposes — service routes to The Boeing Company at the state-specific Corporation Service Company registered agent regardless of which operating-unit designation appears in the caption. Counsel and dispatch coordinators preparing matters that arise from operating-unit conduct should align the captioning with the registered-agent designation by naming The Boeing Company as the legal-person defendant, with the operating-unit designation referenced in the substantive allegations. The dual approach (caption The Boeing Company; reference the operating unit in the body of the complaint) avoids any procedural ambiguity at the service-of-process stage and preserves the substantive allegation about the operating-unit conduct at issue.

Pitfall 7: Treating Undisputed Legal as the Decision-Maker on Substituted-Service Election

When primary service on the registered agent fails — the Corporation Service Company office is closed at the time of attempted delivery, the registered-agent designation has lapsed since the most recent verification cycle, the CSC office has relocated to an address not yet reflected in the current Accurint pull, or the registered agent declines to accept process for any reason — the matter requires a substituted-service election to satisfy the venue-state statutory service requirement. The available substituted-service routes vary by venue: for New York state-court matters, CPLR § 308(2) (deliver-and-mail) and CPLR § 308(4) (nail-and-mail with prior diligent-effort showing) supply the substituted-service paths; for Delaware state-court matters against the Delaware-incorporated entity, DGCL § 321(b) designates the Delaware Secretary of State as the backup substituted-service agent if direct registered-agent service is unavailable; for federal-court matters, FRCP 4(e)(1) provides a state-law fallback that incorporates the venue state’s substituted-service framework.

The election among substituted-service routes is counsel’s call, not a process-service vendor’s call. The election turns on the procedural posture of the matter, the venue court’s prescribed affidavit forms, the timeliness of the matter relative to any statute-of-limitations deadline, and counsel’s strategic judgment about evidentiary completeness for the affidavit-of-service return. Undisputed Legal reports the failure of primary registered-agent service with photographic and GPS-verified evidence of the failed delivery attempt and the operational reasons for the failure; counsel determines the substituted-service election based on that report; Undisputed Legal executes the elected substituted-service route through the corresponding venue-state procedural framework. Treating Undisputed Legal as the decision-maker on the substituted-service election is a UPL boundary failure that misallocates legal-procedural authority away from counsel; the corrected workflow returns the election decision to counsel and treats Undisputed Legal as the operational executor of the elected route.

Why Undisputed Legal — Authority-Grade Pricing

The Boeing Company service is priced at authority-grade Tier 3 rates, reflecting the multi-state foreign-qualification verification work, the state-specific Corporation Service Company office-address confirmation across thirty-five jurisdictions, and the entity-disambiguation analysis (The Boeing Company vs. Boeing operating units vs. BECU vs. historical merged entities) that Boeing matters require. The pricing tiers below apply to single-event service on a captioned Boeing entity at a confirmed registered-agent address; multi-state dispatch tours and substituted-service execution under venue-state-specific Secretary-of-State substituted-service procedures are priced separately based on the specific operational requirements of the matter.

Pricing tiers — Routine: $100–$150 for first attempt within 3-7 business days; Rush: $200–$250 for first attempt within 24-48 hours; Same-Day: $250–$300 for first attempt within hours of dispatch authorization; Stake-Out: $325–$425 for extended observation at the registered-agent location, with stake-out overage billed at an hourly rate of $100–$150 beyond the initial coverage window, for evasive-subject or timing-sensitive matters; Skip Trace: $75 for current-address verification when prior service attempts have failed or when the registered-agent designation has changed.

Stake-out service is rare in Boeing matters because Corporation Service Company office locations across the thirty-five verified states operate during predictable business hours and accept process during those hours under standard registered-agent practice. Stake-out service is reserved for the unusual matter where pre-dispatch reconnaissance has produced a delivery-timing question, or where a CSC office relocation has produced a temporary delivery-availability gap during the transition period.

Undisputed Legal operates under New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection License #1420758-DCA, applicable to service-of-process operations across the five boroughs of New York City (Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Staten Island). GPS-verified affidavit returns are the evidence-grade documentation standard for each Undisputed Legal service event, supporting the affidavit return against any subsequent Rule 12(b)(5) motion to quash or motion challenging the sufficiency of service. The Undisputed Legal process-service network covers all 50 states and 120+ countries, with affiliated process servers in each U.S. metropolitan area and international service coordination through Hague Service Convention member-state central authorities and through the alternative service paths permitted under FRCP 4(f)(3) for non-Convention countries. Boeing-specific compliance: pre-dispatch CSC office-address verification across the thirty-five verified Tier 1 states (with state-SoS confirmation for the AL and VT N/A-status flags) is part of standard engagement scoping for Boeing service, with the verification record preserved as part of the affidavit-of-service file.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does service on a Boeing operating-site address satisfy service on The Boeing Company?

No. Boeing operating units — Boeing Defense, Space & Security; Boeing Commercial Airplanes; Boeing Global Services — are not separately-qualified legal entities. Service for any matter against The Boeing Company routes to the state-specific Corporation Service Company registered agent for the forum state of the matter, not to a Boeing operating-site address. Process delivered to a Boeing operating-site address does not satisfy the statutory service requirement under FRCP 4(h)(1)(B), DGCL § 321, or the parallel venue-state corporation-service statutes. The corrected service path routes to the verified Tier 1 state-specific CSC office address.

If Boeing is sued in California, where is service?

The verified Accurint Corporation Filings pull as of May 9, 2026 did not return an active California foreign-qualification record for The Boeing Company. California is one of the operating-presence states (Boeing operates facilities at El Segundo, Long Beach, Huntington Beach, and Sunnyvale) where the verified Tier 1 routing matrix does not include a California row. Counsel preparing a Boeing matter venued in California state court or in any of the four California federal districts should obtain a current California Secretary of State foreign-qualification record before dispatch and route service to the verified registered-agent designation. As an alternative, counsel may elect to serve at the Delaware state of incorporation under FRCP 4(h)(1)(B), with service routing to CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service at 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808-1674.

Why is Corporation Service Company (CSC) the registered agent in nearly every Boeing state filing?

Boeing’s corporate-secretarial function has designated Corporation Service Company as the registered-agent firm across all thirty-five verified foreign-qualification states and as CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service at the Delaware state of incorporation. The unified designation is a structural fact about how Boeing has chosen to organize its corporate-compliance architecture; the underlying business decision is not preserved in the public filing record beyond the registered-agent designations themselves. The operational consequence for service of process is that counsel preparing Boeing matters in any of the thirty-five verified states has a uniform registered-agent firm identification across the architecture, with state-specific CSC office addresses identified in the Tier 1 routing matrix.

Can a federal plaintiff serve Boeing at the Delaware state of incorporation regardless of forum state?

Yes. FRCP 4(h)(1)(B) authorizes service on a corporation by delivery to an officer, managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service. The registered agent designated in the corporation’s state-of-incorporation filing is an agent authorized by appointment for purposes of FRCP 4(h)(1)(B). For The Boeing Company, the Delaware registered agent (CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service at 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington) satisfies FRCP 4(h)(1)(B) service for any federal-court matter, regardless of the federal venue district. The Delaware route is the canonical state-of-incorporation election for federal-court matters where the federal venue is in a state outside the Boeing thirty-five-state foreign-qualification architecture.

How does service on Boeing differ in New York versus Delaware?

For matters venued in Delaware state courts, service proceeds under DGCL § 321 on the Delaware registered agent (CSC – Lawyers Incorporating Service at the Wilmington office address). For matters venued in New York state courts, service proceeds under CPLR § 311(a)(1) and NY BCL § 306 on the New York registered agent (Corporation Service Company at 80 State Street, Albany). The registered-agent firm designation is the same family — the CSC family — but the state-specific office addresses differ, and the controlling statute differs by venue. For federal-court matters, FRCP 4(h)(1)(B) supports service at either the Delaware or the New York registered agent for any federal-district matter, with the election driven by counsel’s choice of state-of-incorporation forum versus venue-state forum.

Is service on BECU the same as service on The Boeing Company?

No. The Boeing Employees’ Credit Union (BECU) is a separately-organized Washington-state credit union, not a legal subsidiary of The Boeing Company. BECU operates under federal credit-union regulatory framework as an independent financial cooperative serving Boeing employees and other eligible members. Service for any matter against BECU routes to BECU’s own registered-agent designation, which is structurally distinct from The Boeing Company’s Corporation Service Company architecture. Counsel preparing a matter that names BECU as the captioned defendant must verify BECU’s independent registered-agent designation at the pre-dispatch stage; the Boeing Company Tier 1 routing matrix is not the controlling source for BECU service.

What if a state is not in the thirty-five-state routing matrix above?

Boeing maintains operating sites in numerous states beyond the thirty-five enumerated in the Tier 1 routing matrix, including California, Texas, Illinois, and South Carolina. The verified Accurint Corporation Filings pull as of May 9, 2026 did not return active foreign-qualification records for these states. For service in any state not enumerated in the Tier 1 routing matrix, counsel should obtain a current state Secretary of State foreign-qualification record before dispatch and route service to the verified registered-agent designation in that state. Operating presence is not the same as foreign-qualification status. As an alternative, counsel may elect to serve at the Delaware state of incorporation under FRCP 4(h)(1)(B) for federal-court matters, which supports federal-court service in any federal district regardless of whether Boeing maintains a foreign-qualification filing in the venue state.

Does Boeing’s headquarters relocation history affect where to serve?

No. The Boeing Company’s principal executive offices have been associated in different historical periods with different cities, and the corporate-headquarters address in any historical period is not an authorized service address for the corporate entity. Service of process on The Boeing Company is governed by the registered-agent designation in the state-of-incorporation filing (Delaware) and in each of the foreign-qualification states (the Tier 1 routing matrix). Headquarters location, operating-site addresses, and Boeing-affiliated commercial premises are not authorized service venues. The architecture for service is the registered-agent network, not the corporate-headquarters location, regardless of which city houses the principal executive offices in any given calendar year.

What does Undisputed Legal verify before dispatch on a Boeing matter?

Pre-dispatch verification on a Boeing matter has four operational steps. First, for matters venued in any of the thirty-five Tier 1 states (the verified foreign-qualification architecture in the routing matrix), Undisputed Legal confirms the state-specific Corporation Service Company office address against the verified Accurint pull date and against the current state Secretary-of-State or Department-of-State filing record. Second, for matters venued in Tier 2 states (states with Boeing operating presence but no Accurint Corporation Filings record returning an active foreign-qualification entry — California, Texas, Illinois, South Carolina, and other operating-presence states), Undisputed Legal obtains a current state Secretary of State foreign-qualification record to establish whether Boeing maintains an active filing in that state and what the current registered-agent designation is.

Third, Undisputed Legal confirms the registered-agent designation is still active at the date of dispatch — the Accurint pull date is the verification baseline, but registered-agent designations can change between pull cycles, and the dispatch-date confirmation against the current state-SoS record is the operational safeguard against a rejected return for a stale designation. Fourth, Undisputed Legal confirms the captioned defendant entity in the matter is The Boeing Company itself, not The Boeing Employees’ Credit Union (BECU) and not a Boeing operating-unit designation (Boeing Defense, Space & Security; Boeing Commercial Airplanes; Boeing Global Services). Operating-unit designations are not separately-qualified legal entities, and BECU is a separately-organized Washington-state credit union with independent registered-agent designations; service for either of these targets routes outside the Boeing Tier 1 architecture and requires the corresponding entity-specific verification step. The four-step pre-dispatch verification is operational due-diligence executed by Undisputed Legal; it is not a legal opinion on the sufficiency of service, which is counsel’s determination at the affidavit-of-service review stage.

For Authoritative Service on The Boeing Company

Undisputed Legal is the gatekeeper of litigation between counsel and The Boeing Company. Pre-dispatch verification of the state-specific Corporation Service Company office address across the thirty-five verified Tier 1 states (with state-SoS confirmation for the AL and VT N/A-status flags), GPS-verified affidavit returns, photographic documentation of the CSC office service location, and the operational discipline to route Boeing service through the unified CSC registered-agent architecture rather than through corporate-headquarters addresses or Boeing operating-site locations — produce CM/ECF-ready returns of service for commercial litigation, antitrust matters, securities matters, employment matters, product-liability claims, and federal-agency-adjacent matters venued in any federal district or in any of the thirty-five state-of-qualification jurisdictions plus Delaware as the state of incorporation.

The Boeing Company is served at the registered agent confirmed in current state-of-organization and state-of-qualification filings. Boeing operating-site addresses, corporate-headquarters addresses in any historical period, and Boeing-affiliated commercial premises are not authorized service venues. The Boeing Employees’ Credit Union (BECU) is a separately-organized Washington credit union, not a Boeing legal subsidiary; service for BECU matters routes to BECU’s own registered-agent designation. Boeing operating-unit designations (Boeing Defense, Space & Security; Boeing Commercial Airplanes; Boeing Global Services) are not separately-qualified legal entities; service for matters arising from operating-unit conduct routes to The Boeing Company at the state-specific CSC registered agent. Captioning is operational; the entity named in the caption is the entity that must be served, at the agent designated by that entity in the venue where the matter is filed.

To order service on The Boeing Company in any forum state — federal or state, in Delaware as the state of incorporation or in any of the thirty-five active foreign-qualification jurisdictions — call (800) 774-6922 or use the secure order form below.

Order The Boeing Company Service Now

Order Online: undisputedlegal.com/product/order-service/
Email: [email protected]