The Model Registered Agents Act and Service of Process

The Model Registered Agents Act — MoRAA — is the uniform law framework governing how commercial registered agents qualify, maintain, and resign from their role in the states that have adopted it. Most litigators working in New York, California, Delaware, Florida, and Texas have never encountered MoRAA directly because those states have not adopted it. But for process servers and attorneys working in adopting states, MoRAA fundamentally changes how registered agent address verification works: in MoRAA states, the authoritative address for serving a corporation through CT Corporation or Corporation Service Company is not the address embedded in the entity’s individual filing — it is the address in the commercial agent’s listing statement filed separately with the Secretary of State. This distinction matters every time an entity filing carries a stale registered agent address, which happens routinely as commercial agents update their office locations. Understanding the MoRAA framework — what it standardized, which states adopted it, and what it means for pre-dispatch verification — is the practical foundation for reliable corporate service in adopting jurisdictions. For questions about registered agent verification before placing a service order, call (800) 774-6922. For the regulatory framework governing registered agents across all jurisdictions, see our corporate process service registered agent requirements reference.

What MoRAA Is — Origins, Drafting, and Purpose

The Model Registered Agents Act was developed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws — now formally called the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) — in collaboration with the ABA Business Law Section and the International Association of Commercial Administrators (IACA). The act was approved by NCCUSL in 2006 and revised in 2011; it is formally cited as the “Model Registered Agents Act (2006/2011).” Unlike the Uniform Commercial Code or the Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act — which are enacted directly as state statutory law — MoRAA is a model act, meaning states adopt it by enacting their own version of its provisions rather than adopting the text wholesale. The result is that adopting states share MoRAA’s structural framework while retaining jurisdiction-specific modifications.

The problem MoRAA was designed to solve was pre-standardization inconsistency. Before MoRAA, each state had its own rules for: what types of entities or individuals could serve as registered agents; whether a company serving as agent for thousands of entities had to file a separate registration for each; what residency or physical-presence requirements applied; how agents were required to accept service; and what the resignation and replacement procedures were. For a national commercial registered agent like CT Corporation or CSC, operating in all fifty states meant navigating fifty different compliance regimes with materially different requirements, filing procedures, and service mechanics.

MoRAA addressed this through four structural reforms. First, it introduced a formal two-tier classification system distinguishing commercial registered agents from noncommercial agents. Second, it created the listing statement mechanism — allowing commercial agents to file a single registration with the state that covers all entities they represent, rather than appearing in each entity’s individual filing. Third, it standardized resignation and replacement procedures, including mandatory notice windows and SoS fallback obligations. Fourth, it clarified the service-of-process mechanics at the commercial agent level, specifying that delivery to the agent at its listed registered office constitutes service on all represented entities.

The Two-Tier System: Commercial vs. Noncommercial Registered Agents

MoRAA’s defining structural contribution is the distinction between commercial registered agents and noncommercial registered agents. The two categories operate differently from a verification standpoint and carry different obligations.

Commercial Registered Agent (CRA). A commercial registered agent is an entity or individual that has filed a listing statement with the state’s Secretary of State and is thereby included in the state’s official commercial registered agent list. CRAs typically represent large numbers of business entities — CT Corporation represents hundreds of thousands of entities across its national network. In MoRAA states, the CRA’s listing statement is a standalone public record that identifies: the CRA’s name, the registered office address where service of process will be accepted, and the individual designated to receive service at that address. Entity filings in MoRAA states reference the CRA by name — they do not restate the CRA’s registered office address. The listing statement is the authoritative source. If CT Corporation updates its registered office in Oregon, that update appears in CT Corporation’s listing statement, not in each of the thousands of entity filings that name CT Corporation as agent.

Noncommercial Registered Agent (NRA). A noncommercial registered agent has not filed a listing statement. The NRA’s name and registered office address appear directly in each entity’s formation document, annual report, or registered agent statement. NRAs are typically individuals — a company’s own officer, a local attorney, or a small business serving a handful of clients. Because there is no separate listing, the only source for an NRA’s registered office address is the entity’s own filing. NRAs are not required to meet the same qualification standards as CRAs and are not subject to the listing-statement amendment and resignation procedures.

Why the distinction matters for service. In a MoRAA state, a process server looking at an entity’s filing that names “CT Corporation System” as the registered agent must pull CT Corporation’s listing statement to get the current registered office address — not rely on any address that may have appeared in the entity’s filing from two years ago. In a non-MoRAA state, there is no listing statement system; the entity’s own filing is the only source, and the commercial agent’s current office must be independently confirmed through other means. This is the core practical divergence between MoRAA and non-MoRAA jurisdictions.

Key MoRAA Provisions: Sections 5 Through 9 and Section 14

The operational provisions of MoRAA that most directly govern service of process are found in Sections 5 through 9, which address the listing statement lifecycle, and Section 14, which addresses service mechanics.

Section 5 — Listing Statement. A commercial registered agent establishes its status by filing a listing statement with the Secretary of State. The listing statement must include the CRA’s name, the address of its registered office in the state (a physical address — not a P.O. Box), and the name and title of the individual who will accept service of process at that address. The listing statement becomes a public record upon filing, and the CRA is added to the state’s official list of commercial registered agents. From that point, entities may appoint the CRA simply by naming it in their formation or amendment filings.

Section 6 — Amendment. A CRA may amend its listing statement by filing a statement of change with the Secretary of State. The amendment is effective upon filing. This is the mechanism by which a CRA updates its registered office address — for example, when CT Corporation consolidates offices within a state. The amendment applies to all entities the CRA represents in that state simultaneously. No per-entity filings are required to propagate the address change.

Section 7 — Resignation. A CRA may resign by filing a resignation statement with the Secretary of State. The resignation does not take effect immediately: MoRAA provides a 31-day window after filing during which the represented entities must appoint a new registered agent. If no replacement is appointed within that window, the Secretary of State becomes the default agent for service of process. The SoS fallback is intended to ensure that entities are never left without a service-of-process mechanism, even if they fail to respond to the CRA’s resignation notice promptly.

Section 8 — Entity Appointment of CRA. An entity appoints a CRA by naming the CRA in its formation document or a subsequent registered agent statement. Because the CRA has a listing statement on file, the entity’s filing does not need to contain the CRA’s address — the listing statement provides it. This separation is what creates the two-source verification requirement: entity filing confirms which CRA is appointed; listing statement provides the current registered office address.

Section 9 — Termination by Secretary of State. The Secretary of State may terminate a CRA’s listing if the CRA fails to maintain a registered office, fails to pay required fees, or is otherwise in material noncompliance with the state’s registered agent requirements. Termination under Section 9 removes the CRA from the state’s commercial agent list and triggers a replacement obligation for all entities the CRA represented. Service at an address from a terminated CRA’s listing may not constitute valid service if the termination occurred before the service date — this is precisely the failure mode that active-status verification is designed to prevent.

Section 14 — Service of Process Mechanics. MoRAA Section 14 specifies that service of process on a represented entity may be made by delivering a copy of the process to the CRA at its registered office during normal business hours. Delivery to the CRA at its listed registered office constitutes service on the represented entity as of the moment of delivery — regardless of when the CRA actually forwards the documents to the entity. This is the “deemed service” principle: the entity is legally served at the moment the CRA accepts. The CRA’s obligation to forward the documents to the entity is independent of the service completion event.

States That Have Adopted MoRAA

As of the 2011 revision, MoRAA has been adopted in full or substantial form by a number of states, with the Uniform Law Commission tracking enactment status. States known to have adopted MoRAA or substantially equivalent commercial registered agent legislation include Colorado, Mississippi, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin, among others. Several additional states have incorporated MoRAA’s two-tier commercial/noncommercial framework with jurisdiction-specific modifications that preserve the core listing-statement mechanism.

What full adoption means in practice. In a state that has fully adopted MoRAA, the Secretary of State maintains a commercial registered agent list populated by listing statements. Any attorney or process server can pull that list, find the CRA by name, and confirm the current registered office address from the listing statement — rather than relying on the address that may appear in an entity’s potentially outdated individual filing. The amendment mechanism means the listing is self-updating as CRAs file office changes.

Substantial adoption and state modifications. Some states have adopted MoRAA’s structural framework but modified specific provisions — different resignation notice periods, different qualification standards, or different fee structures for commercial agent listing. These modifications typically do not change the core service-of-process mechanics but may affect the procedures for resignation and replacement. Practitioners in states with substantially-adopted MoRAA should confirm the specific version enacted.

MoRAA adoption status changes as states act. The Uniform Law Commission publishes a current enactment map. Before relying on the listing-statement verification pathway for service of process in any state, confirm that the state has adopted MoRAA and that the commercial agent’s listing is in active status with that state’s Secretary of State.

Major Non-Adopting States: NY, CA, DE, FL, TX and What They Use Instead

The five largest commercial litigation jurisdictions — New York, California, Delaware, Florida, and Texas — have not adopted MoRAA. Each operates under a state-specific registered agent statute that predates MoRAA and has not been substantially reformed to incorporate MoRAA’s two-tier framework. Understanding what each state uses instead is essential for correct pre-dispatch verification.

New York. New York’s registered agent framework is governed by BCL §§ 304 through 307 for corporations and LLCL §§ 301 and 303 for LLCs. There is no commercial registered agent listing system. Each entity’s biennial statement or formation document contains the name and address of its registered agent. Commercial agents like CT Corporation appear in thousands of individual entity filings, but there is no standalone CT Corporation listing statement in New York’s SoS database. Verification requires the entity’s own filing. When a registered agent is unavailable or refuses service, BCL § 306 authorizes service on the New York Secretary of State as agent for domestic corporations; BCL § 307 provides the same mechanism for unauthorized foreign corporations. For New York SoS service procedures, see our New York Secretary of State service guide.

California. California’s registered agent framework is governed by Cal. Corp. Code §§ 1502 and 1505 for corporations and the equivalent provisions for LLCs. Each entity’s Statement of Information filed with the California SoS contains the registered agent’s name and, for individual agents, their address. There is no commercial agent listing statement system. The entity’s most recent Statement of Information is the authoritative source. Cal. Corp. Code § 1702 authorizes SoS substitute service for foreign corporations that cannot be served through their registered agent after diligent effort.

Delaware. Delaware’s registered agent framework is governed by 8 Del. C. § 132 for corporations and 6 Del. C. §§ 18-104, 17-104 for LLCs and LPs. Each entity’s record in the Delaware Division of Corporations database lists its registered agent by name. Delaware does not maintain a separate commercial agent listing statement system. The registered agent name in the entity record directs the server to the commercial agent; the commercial agent’s current Delaware office must be confirmed through the agent’s own known operating address or through direct verification. CT Corporation’s Delaware office and CSC’s Wilmington location are well-established but should be confirmed before dispatch, particularly for critical-deadline matters. For Delaware SoS service procedures when registered agent service fails, see our Delaware Secretary of State service guide.

Florida. Florida’s Business Corporation Act requires each entity to designate a registered agent and maintain that designation in the entity’s annual report filed with Florida’s Division of Corporations. The Sunbiz.org database is the public access point. Each entity’s record contains the registered agent’s name and address. No commercial agent listing system exists.

Texas. Texas Business Organizations Code § 5.201 requires each entity to maintain a registered agent and registered office. The agent name and address appear in the entity’s filing in the Texas SoS database. No MoRAA-style commercial agent listing system exists. Under Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 5.251, the SoS may serve as agent when the registered agent cannot be found or refuses service after the required attempts.

The practical consequence of non-adoption: in all five of these states, the entity’s own filing is the only authoritative registered agent source maintained by the state. Commercial agent office addresses that have changed since the last entity filing must be verified independently. There is no listing-statement amendment pathway; a stale address in a California or New York entity filing does not automatically self-correct when the commercial agent moves its office.

How MoRAA Changes Service of Process Verification in Adopting States

In a MoRAA-adopting state, the verification pathway for service on a corporation through a commercial registered agent is a two-step sequence rather than the single-step entity-filing check used in non-adopting states.

Step 1 — Entity filing confirms CRA appointment. The entity’s formation document or most recent annual filing names the commercial registered agent. This step confirms which CRA the entity has appointed and that the appointment is current. If the entity’s filing names “CT Corporation System” as the registered agent, that is confirmed at this step.

Step 2 — CRA listing statement confirms current registered office. The CRA’s listing statement, filed separately with the Secretary of State, contains the current registered office address. This is the address where service should be made. If CT Corporation filed a Section 6 amendment updating its Oregon registered office six months ago, the amended address in the listing statement controls — not whatever address appeared in the entity’s formation documents or last annual report, which may predate the office change.

The two-step verification is not redundant — it is necessary precisely because the two sources can diverge. An entity’s filing may show the CRA’s former address; the listing statement shows the current one. A process server who dispatches to the address in the entity’s filing without checking the listing statement risks arriving at a former office location and executing a failed service attempt, which consumes both time and a service try against the FRCP 4(m) or state service deadline.

Listing status confirmation. The two-step verification must include a check that the CRA’s listing is active — not resigned under Section 7 and not terminated by the state under Section 9. A listing that is in the process of resignation (filed but within the 31-day window) or that has been terminated presents a service validity risk. If the listing is in resigned or terminated status, service should be redirected to the Secretary of State fallback or the entity’s newly appointed replacement agent.

Deemed service timing. MoRAA Section 14’s deemed-service principle means that service is legally complete at the moment of delivery to the CRA at its listed registered office, regardless of how long it takes the CRA to forward the documents to the represented entity. This is legally significant for statute of limitations purposes, for tolling analysis, and for FRCP 4(m) compliance: the service date for all legal purposes is the delivery date to the CRA.

Service Verification in Non-Adopting States: NY, CA, DE Procedures

In non-MoRAA states, there is no listing statement to pull. The entire verification sequence runs through the entity’s own filings in the state’s SoS database, with an independent confirmation step for commercial agent office currency.

New York verification sequence. Search the New York DOS Division of Corporations database for the entity. Confirm the entity is in active status — not dissolved, revoked, or surrendered. The registered agent field in the entity’s filing contains the agent name and, for commercial agents, typically lists the agent’s address in New York. Confirm that the address is the current operating address for the commercial agent, not a former location. For CT Corporation in New York, the current office at 28 Liberty Street, New York NY 10005 has been the standard address for major engagements, but address currency should be independently confirmed for any deadline-sensitive matter. If the registered agent cannot be found, BCL § 306 service to the SoS at One Commerce Plaza, Albany is the fallback for domestic corporations.

California verification sequence. Search bizfile.sos.ca.gov for the entity. Confirm active status. The registered agent name and address appear in the entity’s most recent Statement of Information. For commercial agents, confirm the address in the filing against the agent’s known current California location. Cal. Corp. Code § 1702 provides the SoS fallback for foreign corporations where the registered agent cannot be located after diligent effort.

Delaware verification sequence. Search the Delaware Division of Corporations (corp.delaware.gov) for the entity. Confirm active/good-standing status. The entity’s record names the registered agent. For CT Corporation in Delaware, the standard Wilmington address has historically been used; for CSC, the Wilmington headquarters. Confirm currency directly before any deadline-sensitive dispatch. For Delaware SoS substitute service when registered agent service fails, 8 Del. C. § 321 provides the mechanism.

The key discipline in non-MoRAA states is recognizing that the commercial agent’s address in an entity filing may be one, two, or more years old. Commercial agents update their offices; those updates are not automatically reflected in entity filings absent an affirmative amendment. The independent confirmation step — verifying the commercial agent’s currently operating address before dispatch — is what prevents wasted attempts at former office locations. For the entity-type service rules applicable in each of these jurisdictions, see our entity-type corporate process service guide.

CT Corporation, CSC, and NRAI: Operating Across Both Frameworks

CT Corporation System, Corporation Service Company (CSC), and National Registered Agents, Inc. (NRAI) are the three dominant national commercial registered agents in the United States. All three operate in both MoRAA-adopting and non-adopting states, which means their verification mechanics differ by jurisdiction even for the same agent.

In MoRAA-adopting states. CT Corporation, CSC, and NRAI have each filed commercial registered agent listing statements in each MoRAA state where they operate. Their listing statements are public records in those states’ SoS databases. A process server working a service engagement in Oregon, Washington, Nevada, or Colorado starts by pulling the CRA’s listing statement to confirm the current registered office address — this is the authoritative source, independent of what any entity’s filing may show.

In non-MoRAA states. There are no listing statements for these agents in New York, California, Delaware, Florida, or Texas. The entity’s own filing names the agent; the agent’s current office must be independently confirmed. This does not mean the address is unavailable — these agents maintain well-documented office locations in all major states — but it does mean there is no single state-maintained authoritative listing to cross-check against. Practitioners should confirm the current address directly rather than assuming the entity’s filing is current.

Multi-state engagements. In a multi-state service engagement where a corporate defendant uses CT Corporation as its registered agent in both Oregon (MoRAA state) and New York (non-MoRAA state), the verification sequence differs for each state: Oregon requires a listing-statement check; New York requires an entity-filing check with independent office confirmation. The MoRAA-state check is not transferable to the non-MoRAA state and vice versa. For CT Corporation registered office locations and intake procedures by state, see our CT Corporation service guide.

Address change propagation. In MoRAA states, when CT Corporation or CSC files a Section 6 listing amendment to update its registered office, that change immediately applies to all entities it represents in that state — no per-entity update filings are required. In non-MoRAA states, an office move by the commercial agent does not automatically update entity filings. The entity must separately file an agent statement of change if it wants its SoS record to reflect the new address, and many entities do not do this promptly. This asymmetry is the principal practical difference between MoRAA and non-MoRAA verification from a process-server standpoint.

Registered Agent Qualification Standards Under MoRAA

One of MoRAA’s significant contributions was standardizing the qualification requirements for registered agents — both commercial and noncommercial — across adopting states. Pre-MoRAA, these requirements varied substantially from state to state.

Pre-MoRAA variation. Before MoRAA, some states required registered agents to be residents of the state; others permitted any person or entity with a physical address. Some states required agents to be authorized to transact business in the state; others did not. The definition of a “registered office” — what counts as a physical address for service acceptance purposes — varied by state. Commercial agent qualification was largely undefined: there was no formal distinction between a national commercial agent representing ten thousand entities and an individual attorney serving as agent for their own clients.

MoRAA CRA qualification standards. Under MoRAA, a commercial registered agent must: (1) have or consent to maintain a registered office that is a physical address in the state (not a P.O. Box or mail drop); (2) be available to accept service of process during normal business hours at that address; (3) file and maintain a current listing statement with the Secretary of State; and (4) comply with state fee and reporting requirements. Failure to maintain any of these conditions subjects the CRA to termination under Section 9.

MoRAA NRA qualification standards. A noncommercial registered agent must be an individual who resides in the state, or an entity that is authorized to transact business in the state and has a registered office there. An NRA that moves out of state, loses its authorization to transact business, or closes its registered office has failed to maintain qualification — a fact that affects the validity of service made to that address after the qualification lapse.

Service validity and qualification status. The qualification-status check is not merely a compliance formality — it has direct service-validity implications. Service on a terminated CRA after the Section 9 termination effective date may not constitute valid service on the represented entities, because the CRA no longer holds legal authority to accept service on their behalf. The argument is analogous to service on a former registered agent after the agent resigned and the entity failed to appoint a replacement: if the SoS has become the default agent, service should run through the SoS, not through the former CRA’s address. For the complete legal framework governing registered agent authority and service validity, see our process service laws and legal requirements reference.

How Undisputed Legal’s Verification Protocol Applies the MoRAA Framework

Every Undisputed Legal corporate service engagement begins with a pre-dispatch verification sequence that adapts to the jurisdiction’s registered agent framework — MoRAA or non-MoRAA. The verification output determines the address to which the server is dispatched and documents the basis for that address determination in the GPS-verified affidavit.

In MoRAA states. The verification sequence runs: (1) entity search in the Secretary of State database confirms the entity is active and names the registered agent; (2) if the named agent is a commercial registered agent, the CRA’s listing statement is pulled from the state’s commercial agent list and the registered office address is extracted from the listing statement; (3) the CRA’s listing status is confirmed as active — not in resignation under Section 7 and not terminated under Section 9; (4) the server is dispatched to the address confirmed in the CRA’s listing statement, not the address (if any) in the entity’s own filing. If the listing statement and the entity filing show different addresses, the listing statement controls.

In non-MoRAA states. The verification sequence runs: (1) entity search in the Secretary of State database confirms the entity is active and extracts the registered agent name and address from the entity’s filing; (2) entity good-standing status confirmed; (3) if the registered agent is a national commercial agent, the address in the entity’s filing is cross-checked against known current operating addresses for that agent in that state — flagging any discrepancy for independent confirmation before dispatch; (4) the server is dispatched to the confirmed current address. If the entity’s filing address does not match the commercial agent’s current operating office, the current operating office is used and documented.

GPS-verified affidavit and verification documentation. The GPS-verified affidavit returned after each corporate service engagement documents the verification basis: which SoS database was searched, which filing or listing statement was pulled, the registered office address confirmed, and the GPS coordinates and timestamp of delivery at that address. Server name and license information is included — including DCWP license number for any service made in New York City’s five boroughs. This documentation is designed to withstand challenge: if opposing counsel argues that service was made at an incorrect address, the affidavit shows the specific SoS records that confirmed the address used.

For complex multi-state engagements involving entities registered in both MoRAA and non-MoRAA states, the parallel dispatch coordinated by Undisputed Legal applies the correct verification methodology for each state simultaneously. The unified affidavit package returned to counsel includes the state-specific verification basis for each defendant. For the complete corporate service workflow including multi-entity and multi-state engagements, see our corporate process service complete guide and our complex corporate process service solutions page.

Pricing and Service Options

Undisputed Legal handles service of process engagements in MoRAA states and non-MoRAA states across all 50 jurisdictions. Pre-dispatch registered agent verification — including listing-statement cross-check in MoRAA states — is included in every corporate service engagement. Call (800) 774-6922 to discuss registered agent verification requirements for a specific state or entity before placing your order, or select a service tier below.

Routine Service — $100–$150. First attempt within 3–7 business days. Entity verification, registered agent confirmation (listing statement in MoRAA states; entity filing cross-check in non-MoRAA states), GPS-verified delivery and affidavit.

Rush Service — $200–$250. First attempt within 24–48 business hours. For FRCP 4(m) windows closing within two weeks, answer periods running, or matters requiring confirmed service in the near term.

Same-Day Service — $250–$300. First attempt the same business day when documents are received during normal business hours. For statute of limitations scenarios, TRO hearings, and any matter requiring same-day GPS-verified affidavit return.

Email / Mail Service — $75. Where authorized by statute, court rule, or court order. Counsel must confirm authorization before ordering this tier.

Stake-Out Service — $325–$425. Includes one hour waiting time; each additional hour $100–$150. For individual officer service requiring extended availability or evasion scenarios.

Frequently Asked Questions — MoRAA and Service of Process

What is MoRAA and how does it differ from state registered agent laws?

MoRAA — the Model Registered Agents Act — is a uniform law approved by the Uniform Law Commission in 2006 and revised in 2011. It provides a standardized framework for how registered agents qualify, operate, and resign in states that adopt it. Unlike the Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act or the UCC, MoRAA is a model act rather than a uniform act — states adopt their own versions of its provisions. States that have not adopted MoRAA continue to operate under their own registered agent statutes, which may predate MoRAA by decades and vary considerably from the model act's framework. The core innovation of MoRAA is the two-tier commercial/noncommercial agent classification and the listing-statement mechanism for commercial agents.

Which states have adopted MoRAA?

As of the 2011 revision, states known to have adopted MoRAA or substantially equivalent legislation include Colorado, Mississippi, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin, among others. The Uniform Law Commission publishes a current enactment map tracking adoption status. Because adoption can change — states may enact, amend, or repeal MoRAA provisions — the ULC enactment map is the authoritative current source. The five largest commercial litigation jurisdictions — New York, California, Delaware, Florida, and Texas — have not adopted MoRAA and operate under their own separate registered agent frameworks.

How does MoRAA's commercial agent listing system work for service of process?

In MoRAA states, a commercial registered agent files a listing statement with the Secretary of State that identifies the agent's registered office address — the physical location where service of process will be accepted for all entities the agent represents. Entity filings in MoRAA states name the CRA by name; the listing statement provides the current address. For service of process, the correct procedure is to pull the CRA's listing statement to confirm the current registered office, rather than relying on any address in the entity's individual filing, which may predate a listing-statement amendment. Service at the address confirmed in the CRA's current listing statement constitutes legally complete service on the represented entity at the moment of delivery.

Why haven't New York, California, Delaware, and Texas adopted MoRAA?

Each of these states has an established registered agent statutory framework that predates MoRAA and that has been integrated into that state's broader business entity law — BCL in New York, the Corporations Code in California, Title 8 in Delaware, the Business Organizations Code in Texas. Transitioning to MoRAA would require amending or replacing those frameworks, aligning them with MoRAA's listing-statement mechanics, and updating the SoS database infrastructure. The commercial stakes are substantial: Delaware's registered agent industry — centered on CT Corporation and CSC in Wilmington — is among the largest in the world, and any changes to Delaware's registered agent framework have significant implications for the hundreds of thousands of entities incorporated there. Each state has effectively determined that its existing framework adequately serves its commercial community without requiring MoRAA adoption.

What is the practical difference between a commercial and noncommercial registered agent for a process server?

In MoRAA states: a commercial registered agent has a listing statement on file with the SoS; verification requires pulling that listing statement for the current registered office address. A noncommercial registered agent has no listing statement; the address appears in the entity's own filing and that is the verification source. In non-MoRAA states: the distinction between commercial and noncommercial agents is not formally defined in the registered agent statute, and verification in both cases runs through the entity's individual filing. The MoRAA commercial/noncommercial distinction is operationally relevant only in adopting states; in non-adopting states, the entity's filing is always the primary source regardless of the agent type.

What happens when a commercial registered agent resigns under MoRAA Section 7?

Under MoRAA Section 7, a commercial registered agent resigns by filing a resignation statement with the Secretary of State. The resignation is not immediately effective: MoRAA provides a 31-day window after filing during which the represented entities must appoint a new registered agent. The CRA is required to notify all entities it represents of the resignation — typically through the entity's last known address on file. If an entity does not appoint a new agent within the window, the Secretary of State becomes the default agent for service of process on that entity. From a process-server standpoint: if a CRA's listing shows "resigned" status, verify whether the entity has appointed a replacement before attempting service at the former CRA's address, and route service to the SoS if no replacement is on file.

How does MoRAA affect how I verify a registered agent address before service?

In MoRAA states: the verification sequence is a two-step check — (1) entity filing confirms which CRA is appointed; (2) CRA listing statement confirms the current registered office address. The listing statement is the authoritative source; if it differs from any address in the entity's filing, the listing statement controls. Also confirm the CRA's listing is in active status — not resigned or terminated. In non-MoRAA states: the entity's own filing is the source for the registered agent name and address; independently confirm that the commercial agent's currently operating office matches the address in the filing before dispatch, since entity filings in non-MoRAA states do not self-update when commercial agents move.

Does MoRAA affect service on CT Corporation or CSC?

Yes, in MoRAA-adopting states. CT Corporation and CSC have filed commercial registered agent listing statements in each MoRAA state where they operate. In those states, the authoritative registered office address for CT Corporation or CSC — for service on any entity they represent — is the address in their current listing statement, not the address in any individual entity's filing. In non-MoRAA states (NY, CA, DE, FL, TX), there are no listing statements for these agents; the entity's own filing is the source, and their current operating office addresses must be independently confirmed. The verification approach differs by state even for the same commercial agent.

Order Service of Process — Contact Undisputed Legal

Undisputed Legal handles service of process engagements across all 50 states — MoRAA states and non-MoRAA states — with pre-dispatch registered agent verification tailored to each jurisdiction's framework. Every corporate service engagement includes entity status confirmation, registered agent address verification (listing statement in MoRAA states; entity filing cross-check in non-MoRAA states), GPS-verified delivery, and a fully documented affidavit. Call (800) 774-6922 or place your order online. For additional reference: corporate process service complete guide, registered agent requirements, process service laws, and service timing and deadlines.

WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING

Ready to Serve Process Service? Order Now

Every day you wait is a day closer to a missed deadline. Statutes of limitations run. Discovery windows close. Process Service's legal team is already prepared — are you?

Order Service Online — Upload your documents and we begin immediately.
Call (800) 774-6922 — Speak with our team for rush or same-day service.
Email [email protected] — Send documents and we confirm within the hour.

Don't let improper service destroy your case against Process Service. Hire the professionals who do this every day.

Professional Credentials & Affiliations

Undisputed Legal Inc. maintains active membership and affiliations with the following professional organizations: National Association of Professional Process Servers (NAPPS), United States Process Servers Association (USPSA), National Association of Legal Support Professionals (NAOSP), Better Business Bureau (BBB) A+ Rating, New York State Unified Court System, DCWP Licensed Process Server (NYC), International Association of Professional Process Servers, National Notary Association, American Bar Association (ABA) - Allied Member, New York County Lawyers Association, Brooklyn Bar Association, Queens County Bar Association, Bronx County Bar Association, Staten Island Bar Association, Westchester County Bar Association, and Nassau County Bar Association.

Corporate Process Service Resources

Undisputed Legal is the authority in corporate process service. Explore our expertise:

• Complex Corporate Process Service — Advanced Legal Strategies
• How to Serve Business Entities — Corporate Process Service
• Corporate Process Service for Business Entities
• Registered Agents & Process Service — What Businesses Must Know
• Serving Legal Papers at CT Corporation — Step-by-Step Guide
• How to Serve Legal Papers at CT Corporation
• Understanding Registered Agents for Service of Process
• The Model Registered Agents Act and Service of Process
• National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws
• Corporate Process Service: Registered Agent Requirements
• Corporate Process Service: A Complete Guide
• Corporate Process Service Laws: Requirements & Compliance
• Complex Corporate Process Service Solutions
• Corporate Process Service: E-Service Requirements & Solutions
• Why Serve Legal Papers Through the New York Secretary of State
• How to Serve Legal Papers on the Delaware Secretary of State
• How to Serve Legal Papers on the New Jersey Secretary of State
• Process Service Rules & Laws: Serving Secretary of State
• New York State Process Server Regulations, Compliance & Liability

Get Directions to Our Manhattan Office