This article will provide guidance on the Code of Civil Procedure in China Macau. The Basic Law of the Macau Special Administrative Region is the highest in the region. The statute is a Chinese law approved by Article 31 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China and the Sino-Portuguese Joint Declaration on the Question of Macau (an international treaty deposited with the United Nations).  The Basic Law is essentially a constitution for Macau. It draws inspiration from Hong Kong but differs in several respects, including incorporating Portuguese constitutional rules on fundamental rights. Macau is a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Click here for How the Hague Convention Simplifies International Process Service.


The transfer of sovereignty from Portugal to the PRC in 1999 did not significantly alter Macau's legal system due to the principle of continuity of the pre-existing legal system, under which all sources in force before the transfer of sovereignty continued to apply with some minor exceptions that were specified in December 1999. Click Here for information on the Code of Civil Procedure in China Macau

Macau Special Administrative Region (SAR) courts are hierarchical, with the highest court having an ultimate say save in minimal circumstances. There are three judges in the Court of Final Appeal and five in the Court of Second Instance. The law permits trials with a jury, but no one uses them. Macau's court system was subordinate to the Judiciary District of Lisbon under the Portuguese legal framework before 1991. Click here for information on How To Serve Legal Papers in China and Hong Kong.

The Court of Appeal for the Judiciary District of Lisbon has been superseded by the Superior Court of Justice of Macau. In 1999, the Court of Appeal took over as the highest court, replacing the previous Supreme Court. Click Here for Frequently Asked Questions About Process Servers!


Macau's legal system is based on civil law. Legal norms in Macau are generally consistent with those of a civil law system, in which statutes rather than case law serve as the primary basis for the law. Macau's legal framework consists of the ‘basic’ five:  [A.] the Civil Code, [B.] the Commercial Code, [C.] the Civil Procedure Code, [D.] the Penal Code, and [E.] the Criminal Procedure Code. Several additional, less comprehensive codes exist (e.g., administrative law). The Civil Code of 1999 and the Commercial Code of 1999 form the backbone of Macau's private law framework. Other laws, such as those establishing default contract provisions, are also significant. Click here for information on How To Identify A Good Process Service Agency.

Macau's legal system is headed by the Public Prosecutors Office ( Ministério Pblico). A prosecutor general and an assistant prosecutor general administer the office. General prosecutors handle the day-to-day operations of the law. Since its inception, the Macau SAR has enjoyed fast-growing economic and social development, as never before, due to its gaming industry and growing position as a connection hub for Portuguese-speaking countries. Click here for information on How Rush Process Service Can Expedite Your Case.

The Macau Civil Procedure Code, the most significant law governing private litigation, has had a few updates to reflect these changes (MCPC). Decree-Law 55/99/M, published on 8 October 1999 and enacted on 1 November 1999, was the first legal document to establish the MCPC. Click here for information on How Service of Process Ensures A Solid Foundation.


Macau is a unique administrative territory of China with Mandarin Chinese (in the Cantonese variety) and Portuguese as its official languages. All government institutions, such as the local courts and the Legislative Assembly, and all official papers are bilingual. Macau has always been distinguished by the unique blend of Chinese, Portuguese, and native Macanese traditions that it has attracted. Click here for information on How Process Servers Protect Your Rights: Myths Debunked.

For fifty years after the handover (until 2049), Macau will have a high degree of autonomy except in foreign and defense affairs (matters of responsibility of the Central People's Government) per the Joint Declaration of the government of the PRC and the government of the Republic of Portugal on the question of Macau, signed on April 13, 1987.  This implies that Macau has full autonomy in all government areas, including the ability to make binding decisions in its courts.  Macau's significant codes were initially drafted in Portuguese and are equivalent to their counterparts in Portugal, indicating that the legal system in Macau is primarily based on Portuguese law and thus belongs to the civil law tradition. However, the code is a hybrid for business law since it uses specific standard law devices. 

The Government of Macau is the Region's executive authority, headed by a Chief Administrative (Chefe do Executivo), who has considerable policymaking and executive powers but is ultimately responsible to the Central People's Government and the MSAR.  The Central People's Government appoints a three-hundred-person Election Committee to choose the Chief Executive. These members come from industry, commerce, finance, education, labor, society, and religion. 

The Chief Executive must be a Chinese national who has lived in Macau as their principal place of residence for at least the last twenty years (Article 46 of the Macau Basic Law). There is a two-term limit on service, meaning that no one may stay in office for more than five years at a time (Article 48 of the Macau Basic Law).


First, it is essential to note that various forms of civil litigation are handled differently. Even so, the parties are subject to laws governing how much they must pay the victorious party in court and attorneys fees (‘procuradoria’).  It is important to remember that under the domestic legal environment of the Macau SAR, ‘court costs’ may refer to a wide range of monetary awards, including reimbursements, transportation charges, and other types of compensation. 

According to the CCR's unique distribution procedures, the loser is generally responsible for covering the winner's expenses. There are, however, notable exceptions, including some private and labor law conflicts between state authorities, official organizations and government departments or comparable bodies (e.g., municipalities), or victims of a work accident, for which the parties do not have to pay a fee. Moreover, there are distinct policies for dealing with specific exceptions. Suppose the plaintiff wins, but the case is dismissed because the suit is moot. In that case, the plaintiff may be responsible for all litigation costs, even if the suit was meritless (unless the defendant is at fault, as in the case where the obligation is not yet enforceable due to a future maturity date).  If the matter is resolved via arbitration, the parties will split the expenses equally. 

Whenever the law does not explicitly state who is responsible for covering costs, the court will decide based on several key concepts, including ‘dar causa à acço’ (meaning to produce an unnecessary lawsuit), ‘ficar vencido na acço,’ and ‘tirar proveito da acço.’ As a result, several factors are context-dependent, including the specific procedures, the nature of the dispute, the behavior of the parties, etc. The court's decision is case-specific, and the victor may not consistently be reimbursed for their fees and expenses.

The losing party is often responsible for covering the expenditures of gathering evidence, including the fees associated with (expert and other) witnesses. Again, there are always exceptions, for example, if the court finds the winning party's evidence irrelevant.  The winner pays all costs associated with the situation. It depends on the case's specifics, particularly the kind of evidence obtained and its location, and whether these expenditures substantially contribute to the total litigation costs.

Chinese and Portuguese are used in Macau SAR's legal documents since these are the most commonly spoken languages. Any version in English that may be found is an unauthorized translation.


Pre-litigation methods, such as mediation, are not often required by law in Macau SAR civil procedure. However, the Macau CPC mandates conciliation attempts before the court in certain situations and stages of the process.  If the parties can reach an agreement via conciliation, the fees, and expenditures are typically split evenly unless the parties agree to an alternative arrangement.

The Macau CPC stipulates that self-representation may be permitted depending on the nature of the proceedings and the value at stake. The legal jurisdiction, or ‘alçada,’ of the courts of first instance,19 in appeal procedures, and the area of judgment enforcement are 50,000.00 patacas (about USD 6,000), at which point legal representation by an attorney is essential.  On the other hand, self-representation is unusual in actual practice.

Depending on the kind of action and the amount at stake, such fees may be necessary for the Macau Special Administrative Region of China. Retained fees for legal services are permissible and are governed by the Macau Lawyers' Association's Rules on Legal Opinion. The amount at issue, among other things, plays a significant role in establishing the specific amounts that must be paid. Because it does not seem widespread, the practice is unlikely to have much of an impact as a deterrent.

Court expenses depend on several variables, including the nature of the dispute (e.g., family, commercial, or labor issues), the amount at stake, whether the case is being heard at the trial or appeal level and the nature and number of the procedural actions required by the parties. The specific amount granted to the party or parties is at the court's discretion. The case's particular facts, including the parties' behavior throughout the litigation, will inform the court's discretionary decision. In this case, the ruling is essential to the final verdict. Fees contingent on a case's outcome are prohibited in the Macau Special Administrative Region (SAR) court system, whether they are agreed to between the client and attorney or are imposed by the court. 

Current law allows the initial responder to file a counterclaim and motion against the original petitioner or petitioners within specified (broad) parameters. However, under the proposed changes, the respondent would be able to ask the court to allow a third party to join the proceeding (provoked intervention) whenever doing so is necessary for the third party to exercise a right to present a counterclaim (the intervenor would become a party associated with them) or a cross-counterclaim (the intervenor would become a party associated with the petitioner or petitioners). 


The tenant's default is a cause for special procedures that streamline the eviction process. Until the landlord obtains an enforceable order and the court restores ownership of the building to the landlord, they may incur significant damages if the eviction is based on the tenant's failure. To streamline the process, it has been suggested that a signed lease agreement and proof of delivery of a letter of default sent by the landlord to the tenant with the number of rents due would be sufficient for the landlord to be awarded an enforceable title that they may execute and so get the rented building back in their possession if they so choose.

Since the original passage of the LBOJ, it has undergone many revisions. While numerous attorneys have brought the need for more TUI judges to the attention of the Macau government over the last decade, the TUI has not responded to these concerns.


Using telematics or electronic media connected to the electronic systems of the courts, several nations have already allowed for the submission, processing, and review of judicial papers and other evidence-related press, as well as those of questioned witnesses or experts. The MCPC has not yet introduced an online solution for any procedural issues.

This has been repeatedly brought to light, notably during the last two years, when the courts and all other public services in Macau have been sporadically closed because of the COVID-19 outbreak. It has been over two years since the Macau SAR's borders were closed to non-residents. As a result, numerous representatives, witnesses, and experts could not attend scheduled hearings. Most judicial proceedings have been delayed because of postponements of hearings. However, courts have recently begun opting for alternate methods to continue processes, such as questioning witnesses and experts via written statements in compliance with Articles 540 and 541 of the MCPC.

Many non-urgent hearings were postponed because the courts' suspensions could have taken place remotely using the requisite electronic court system. The urgent ones could have been handled more safely, preventing delays in justice being done.

Macau's highest court is the Last Instance Court (Tribunal de Ultima Instância, or TUI). Since its inception in 1999, this court has always had the same three justices. Each ‘chamber’ of the superior courts of Macau consists of three judges, as required by Article 25 of Law No. 9/1999 (Basis of the Judiciary Organisation Law, or LBOJ). All three of its judges decide every matter brought before the TUI, except the judge tasked with writing the verdict (the ‘rapporteur’), who may change.

Current MCPC law still places substantial discretion on the shoulders of the judge at every stage of the enforcement process. Since the judge must order every demarche necessary for such inquiry, investigating the debtor's assets may halt numerous processes for a long time, depending on the court's docket.

It may be avoided if, once the judge has given the order to subpoena the debtor, the phase of researching assets to be confiscated during the proceedings took place outside of court. The debtor's assets would after that be subject to a search, arrest, and liquidation by an enforcement agency authorized by the creditor or the court. Members of the Macau Lawyers Association who express interest in serving as enforcement agents should be selected. The legislation should establish and specify the requisite legal authorities to be entrusted to them to ensure their position as enforcers is adequately defined and legally protected.


Documents can be faxed at (800)-296-0115, emailed to, mailed to 590 Madison Avenue, 21 Floor, New York, New York 10022, or dropped off at any of our locations. We do require pre-payment and accept all major credit and debit cards. Once payment is processed, your sales receipt is immediately emailed for your records.

Drop-offs must call and make an appointment first to be added to building security to permit access to our office. Documents for service must be in a sealed envelope with payment in the form of a money order or attorney check (WE DO NOT ACCEPT CASH) payable to UNDISPUTED LEGAL INC.; Our receptionist receives all documents.


Alaska | Alabama | Arkansas | Arizona | California | Colorado | Connecticut | District of Columbia | Delaware | Florida| Georgia | Hawaii | Iowa | Idaho | Illinois | Indiana | Kansas | Kentucky | Louisiana | Maryland | Massachusetts | Maine | Michigan | Minnesota | Mississippi | Missouri | Montana | North Carolina | North Dakota | Nebraska | New Hampshire | New Jersey | New Mexico | Nevada | New York | Ohio | Oklahoma | Oregon | Pennsylvania | Rhode Island | South Carolina | South Dakota | Tennessee | Texas | Utah | Virginia | Vermont | Washington | West Virginia | Wisconsin | Wyoming


Albania | Andorra | Anguilla | Antigua | Argentina | Armenia | Australia | Austria | Azerbaijan | Bahamas | Barbados | Belarus | Belgium | Belize | Bermuda | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Botswana | Brazil | British Honduras | British Virgin Islands | Bulgaria | Canada | Cayman Islands | Central and Southern Line Islands | Chile|China (Macau) | China People's Republic | Colombia | Costa Rica | Country of Georgia | Croatia | Cyprus | Czech Republic | Denmark | Dominican Republic | Ecuador | Egypt | Estonia | Falkland Islands and Dependences | Fiji | Finland | France | Germany| Gibraltar | Gilbert and Ellice Islands | Greece | Guernsey | Hong Kong | Hungary | Iceland | India | Ireland | Isle of Man | Israel | Italy | Jamaica | Japan | Jersey Channel Islands | Jordan | Kazakhstan | Korea | Kuwait | Latvia | Lithuania | Luxembourg | Malawi | Malaysia | Malta | Mauritius | Mexico| MonacoMontenegro | Montserrat | Morocco | Namibia | Netherlands | New Zealand|Nicaragua | Norway | Pakistan | Panama | Paraguay | Peru | Philippines | Pitcairn |Poland | Portugal | Republic of Moldova | Republic of North Macedonia | Romania |Russian Federation | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | San Marino | Saudi Arabia | Serbia | Seychelles | Singapore| Slovakia| Slovenia | South Africa | Spain | Sri Lanka | St. Helena and Dependencies | St. Lucia | Sweden | Switzerland | Taiwan| Thailand | Tunisia | Turkey | Turks and Caicos Islands| UkraineUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Uruguay | US Virgin Islands | Uzbekistan | Venezuela | Vietnam


New York: (212) 203-8001 – 590 Madison Avenue, 21st Floor, New York, New York 10022
Brooklyn: (347) 983-5436 – 300 Cadman Plaza West, 12th Floor, Brooklyn, New York 11201
Queens: (646) 357-3005 – 118-35 Queens Blvd, Suite 400, Forest Hills, New York 11375
Long Island: (516) 208-4577 – 626 RXR Plaza, 6th Floor, Uniondale, New York 11556
Westchester: (914) 414-0877 – 50 Main Street, 10th Floor, White Plains, New York 10606
Connecticut: (203) 489-2940 – 500 West Putnam Avenue, Suite 400, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
New Jersey: (201) 630-0114 - 101 Hudson Street, 21 Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey 07302
Washington DC: (202) 655-4450 - 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 300, Washington DC 20004


Pick up the phone and call Toll-Free (800) 774-6922 or click the service you want to purchase. Our dedicated team of professionals is ready to assist you. We can handle all your China Macau process service needs; no job is too small or too large!  For instructions on How To Serve Legal Papers in China, Click Here!

Contact us for more information about our process-serving agency. We are ready to provide service of process to all our clients globally from our offices in New York, Brooklyn, Queens, Long Island, Westchester, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Washington, D.C.

"Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives"- Foster, William A