How to Serve Out-of-State or Foreign Defendants Visiting New York

Challenges of Serving Defendants Visiting New York

When you need to serve out-of-state or foreign defendants visiting New York, the window of opportunity can be incredibly brief. Defendants who are only in the state for business, family, or personal reasons may be available for service for just hours or days, making precision and speed critical. Under New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR), personal delivery within the state is sufficient to establish jurisdiction, even if the defendant’s residence or primary place of business is elsewhere. Missing this opportunity could result in costly delays, dismissal, or the need for complicated out-of-state or international service.

At Undisputed Legal, we understand the urgency and strategic planning required to properly serve out-of-state or foreign defendants visiting New York. Our experienced team of process servers is trained to act quickly, comply with CPLR 308 and CPLR 313 requirements, and document every step of service to withstand court scrutiny. This article explores the rules, timing requirements, and best practices to ensure that transient defendants are served lawfully and effectively before they leave New York.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR NEW YORK

• Personal jurisdiction is the first step: The plaintiff must prove that New York has personal jurisdiction over the defendant before service may provide jurisdiction. CPLR §§ 301 (general jurisdiction) and 302 (long-arm jurisdiction) tell you whether you may sue someone who doesn’t live in New York. Just because someone serves you, particularly during a brief visit, doesn’t mean they have authority. 
• New York courts don’t always have enough contact with a person just because they are in New York, as for a short business trip or visit. This is particularly true if the defendant’s temporary presence has nothing to do with the litigation. The courts examine at how long the visit was, if the lawsuit sprang from that presence, and whether the defendant had enough warning.
• CPLR § 308 controls service in New York: If a plaintiff is serving a defendant who is physically present in New York, they must follow CPLR 308. There are several ways to do this, such as personal service (CPLR 308(1)), substituted service or leave-and-mail (CPLR 308(2)), service on an agent (CPLR 308(3)), ‘nail and mail’ (CPLR 308(4)), or court-ordered replacement service (CPLR 308(5)).
• CPLR Section 313 lets you serve someone outside of New York as if you were in New York.  If a non-resident is subject to jurisdiction under §301 or §302, service outside of New York may be done the same manner as served inside the state, utilising the same CPLR 308 procedures or other authorised ways. 
• CPLR 306-b applies: Under CPLR 306-b, the summons and complaint must be served within 120 days after filing the case. The court may throw out the action without prejudice if the plaintiff doesn’t serve within this time limit and doesn’t get an extension or prove good reason or ‘interest of justice.’ 
• Extensions of time may be granted: Courts may extend the service date for ‘good cause’ (meaning reasonable care in serving) or in the ‘interest of justice.’ Even if there are delays in delivery, a plaintiff may escape being thrown out of court by showing that they moved quickly or that the defendant would not be hurt. 
• Parties need to provide proof of service, and it has to meet the requirements in CPLR 306 and 308: After service (in-state or out-of-state), plaintiffs must provide a proof of service or affidavit that includes information on how service was done, who got it, when and where it happened, and any evidence of mailing or refusal. For replacement or alternate service, evidence must show how and why the efforts were made. If you don’t adequately verify service, you might face problems and perhaps be dismissed.

PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS & MEMBERSHIPS

Frequently Asked Questions: How to Serve Out-of-State or Foreign Defendants Visiting New York

1. Can I serve someone in New York just because they’re visiting for a few days?
   Merely serving a person while they are temporarily in New York does not always give the court personal jurisdiction, especially if their visit is unrelated to the lawsuit. Plaintiffs must show that serving the defendant in New York was not opportunistic or unfair and that the defendant had sufficient contact with the state. If jurisdiction is lacking, service may be challenged or dismissed.
2. What is ‘tag’ service, and when does it work?
   ‘Tag’ service refers to personal service delivered in person while the defendant is physically present (e.g., handing the papers to them while they are passing through New York). But New York courts will assess whether the defendant’s presence in the state was substantial enough or related to the lawsuit. If serving was opportunistic (for instance, on someone visiting briefly), the defendant may contest jurisdiction and challenge service under due process principles.
3. How long do I have to serve someone in New York?
   Under CPLR 306-b, a plaintiff generally has 120 days from the commencement of the action (the date the case is filed) to serve the summons and complaint unless the statute of limitations requires a shorter deadline. If service is not made in time, the defendant can move to dismiss the action unless the plaintiff shows good cause or that extending service time is in the interest of justice. 
4. Can the court extend the service deadline after 120 days?
   Yes. A court can extend the deadline if the plaintiff shows either good cause (they exercised reasonable diligence in attempting service) or that an extension is justified in the interest of justice (balancing factors such as statute of limitations, notice, prejudice to defendant, and merits of the case). 
5. What can I do if the person left New York before I served them?
   If the defendant departs New York before service is completed, the plaintiff may need to apply for a court order under CPLR 308(5) permitting alternative or substituted service methods (such as mail, email, publication, or other means). Plaintiffs must explain why traditional service wasn’t possible and propose methods reasonably calculated to give notice. If alternative service is done without court authorization, it may be invalid. 
6. Does New York allow me to serve someone out of state using New York’s rules?
   Yes, CPLR 313 allows plaintiffs to serve out-of-state defendants as if service were happening within New York, but only if those defendants are subject to New York’s personal jurisdiction (i.e., they are domiciled in New York, or fall under general or specific jurisdiction under CPLR 301 or 302). 
7. What proof of service do I need when serving someone in New York or out of state?
   You must file a proof of service or affidavit of service showing who was served, where and when service was made, how it was delivered, and by whom. If substituted or alternative service methods were used (such as leave-and-mail or nail-and-mail), the affidavit must also describe the delivery, mailing, and timing. For out-of-state service, proof should explain compliance with CPLR or court orders.
8. Can I serve someone via email or publication if they are out of state?
   Possibly, but normally not without a court order under CPLR 308(5) or express agreement. Email or publication can be used as alternative methods, but only if traditional personal service is not practical, and the court has authorized such methods. Without a proper court order or consent, those methods may not meet due process or jurisdictional requirements.
9. What if service is defective or proof of service is flawed can the defendant still challenge jurisdiction?
   Yes. If service was done incorrectly, or if proof of service is missing or defective, the defendant can move to dismiss or quash service, on grounds such as improper service method, untimely service, or lack of proof. If the defendant never received proper notice or the court never acquired jurisdiction, the case may be dismissed or a default judgment vacated.
10. Should I hire a professional process server if the defendant is only briefly in New York?
    Yes, hiring a knowledgeable process server can be very helpful in such situations. Experienced process servers understand CPLR 308 and 313, can plan service during the defendant’s stay, document their attempts carefully, and, if needed, file for alternative service. Proper planning and documentation reduce the risk that service will be attacked or that jurisdiction will be challenged later.

 The relationship between service and jurisdiction cannot be overstated. A transitory defendant served during temporary presence may contest jurisdiction if the presence was fleeting or irrelevant to the case, or if the notice was deemed unreasonable under the circumstances. Courts may look for proof that the plaintiffs knew they would not be able to be there, that the defendants were given fair warning of the lawsuit, and that service was not done opportunistically when the person was just temporarily there without proper notice. Process service CANNOT be done on a temporary resident in New York without adequate jurisdiction arising in turn. 

If a defendant is only in New York for a short time the plaintiffs must think about whether the defendant’s presence or activities in the state establish jurisdiction, whether that jurisdiction is broad or particular, and if service was made while the defendant was there. Even a temporary presence may not always be enough to maintain jurisdiction, especially if service is made during a short or unplanned visit. No matter how long a party may be in the state, our Undisputed Legal private process servers are here to ensure that your papers are served in time.

Background: How to Serve Out-of-State or Foreign Defendants Visiting New York

Before service of process may take effect, the plaintiffs must first make sure that the New York courts have personal jurisdiction over the defendant. CPLR  301 and 302 of New York’s long-arm laws explain when courts may have jurisdiction over defendants who live outside of the state or are not residents of the state. This can happen if the defendant does business in New York or commits a tort in the state. Service of process may only provide the court effective jurisdiction and let it decide the case if personal jurisdiction exists.

Plaintiffs must follow CPLR Section 308, which sets the rules for serving people in New York State.  Plaintiffs in New York must employ one of the methods of service in the CPLR to serve a defendant, even if it is just for a short time. Alternatively, they may get a court order under CPLR 308(5) that allows for non-traditional or substituted service.

CPLR § 313 is the main law that allows service to be conducted outside of New York for defendants who are not physically in the state (without the state). CPLR 313 states that:

‘Anyone who lives in the state or is subject to the courts of the state under section 301 or 302 may be served with the summons outside the state in the same way that service is made within the state. This includes any person who is allowed to serve within the state and lives there, or any person who is allowed to serve by the laws of the state, or any qualified attorney, solicitor, barrister, or equivalent in that jurisdiction.’ 

New York courts maintain that CPLR 313 means that service on a defendant from another state must be done as if it were done in New York, using CPLR standards. The defendant in Durgom v. Durgom did not live in the state or have a permanent address there. Nonetheless, he kept a New York City business office. An alleged violation of a separation agreement gave rise to the plaintiff’s case. The plaintiff contended that the defendant was subject to personal jurisdiction over him as a result of service being made upon him in accordance with CPLR 308 (3). 

The defendant’s New York City place of business had the summons attached to the door, and his California house received a copy in the mail. Since the court did not have jurisdiction over the defendant, he was able to have the complaint dismissed. The court held that in order to reach its finding, it was necessary to read the ‘last known residence’ clause of CPLR 308(3) as meaning a ‘last known residence’ inside the state. Furthermore, under CPLR 302, an individual who engages in business in New York cannot be subject to in personam jurisdiction unless the legal action stems from the commercial transaction itself.. 

Serving Defendants Who Are Not Located in Your State (Individuals)

 To fully grasp the groundwork of service techniques under New York law, one must first investigate alternate service and out-of-state service regulations.  According to the CPLR, personal service (also known as ‘substituted service’) performed by an adult and at their discretion (CPLR 308(2)) is preferable. Service can also be done upon an authorised agent or designated representative (CPLR 308(3)) or according to alternative service mandated by the court (CPLR 308(5)) and ‘nail and mail’ service after due diligence (CPLR 308(4)).  The constitutional due process requirements, which include these approaches, state that any mode of service must be reasonably tailored to provide the defendant genuine notice of the coming action.

In order for CPLR 313 to be applicable, one of the following must be true [A.] either the defendant must have their primary residence in New York or [B.] the defendant should be subject to the jurisdiction of the New York courts under CPLR 302 (long-arm jurisdiction) or 301 (general jurisdiction). Courts in New York may exercise personal jurisdiction over non-domicilians who engage in business inside the state under the long-arm law (CPLR 302(a)(1)). When deciding whether a defendant has engaged in business in New York, courts consider all of the defendant’s intentional actions inside the forum as they pertain to the contract.

Even when the defendant does not actually reside in New York, the fact that they are required to keep compensatory amounts in a New York bank account as per the terms of their loan arrangement might be a major element in establishing jurisdiction.

Things to Keep in Mind When Serving a Temporary Resident in New York

A defendant who is ‘temporary’ in New York, such a business traveller, guest, or anyone passing through for a brief time, makes service and jurisdiction more difficult. Plaintiffs, process servers, and courts must take into account both service and the constitutional due process consequences of being itinerant.

Personal jurisdiction over a transitory defendant hinges on whether their presence in New York adequately addresses due process requirements and statutory long-arm prohibitions. In some instances, New York courts mandate that serving of process occurs while the defendant is physically present in New York, therefore establishing jurisdiction over the individual via that presence, referred to as ‘tag’ jurisdiction. However, just being there doesn’t necessarily give you jurisdiction, particularly if you were only there for a short time if it had nothing to do with the case.

Under CPLR 306-b, plaintiffs must pay attention to service timeliness. This means that the summons and complaint must be served within 120 days after filing, unless the court gives a solid reason or for the sake of justice. CPLR 306-b.† If service isn’t done on time or the plaintiffs don’t ask for further time, the case may be thrown out. CPLR 306-b. 

If the defendant is only in New York for a short period, the plaintiffs may have to work quickly. The time frame for physically serving the defendant may shut when the defendant leaves, thus prompt substituted or alternative service is very important. If the defendant has departed New York before service, the plaintiffs should keep a close eye on whether they need to ask for more time or a different way to serve them before the 120-day limit runs out.

Substituted and Alternative Service on a Temporary defendant

If the plaintiffs can’t physically serve a temporary defendant while they are in New York, or if they try to serve the defendant but fail, they may ask the court to order alternate service under CPLR § 308(5). To do this, the plaintiff need to file a petition and get a court order that lists various ways to serve the papers, including via mail, email, publishing, or any other means that is likely to provide notice.

Plaintiffs in temporary presence cases must show that normal service was not feasible or likely to work, or that the defendant has departed New York and personal service is no longer possible. If the defendant has left the state and service is attempted, the plaintiffs should quickly submit an application for CPLR 308(5) service to avoid problems with jurisdiction and statutory deadlines. If alternative service is not ordered, using other means without permission from the court may not work, which might lead to subsequent challenges based on due process.

According to BCL § 306(b) and § 307, plaintiffs may use the Secretary of State as a statutory agent to serve process on certain businesses. The plaintiff gives the Secretary of State two or more copies of the summons and complaint (or petition) and pays a fee set by law. The Secretary of State then has to send the process to the entity. 

Rule 4(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide instructions on how to serve people from other countries, however New York’s CPLR does not include the Hague Convention. Instead, it says that plaintiffs must employ techniques that are ‘authorised by the laws of the state … in which service is made.’ CPLR 313. So, the plaintiffs may need to ask a New York court for permission to utilise other serving techniques that are allowed by international treaties or foreign law, or to establish that previous efforts to serve the defendant have failed.

Requirements for Proof of Service and Filing

When service is performed outside of the United States under CPLR 313, plaintiffs must submit a proof of service or affidavit with the court clerk in New York. This shows that service was done in accordance with both New York and international law, which is necessary to meet jurisdictional and due process requirements. If the service was done by mail or courier, the plaintiffs may need to provide evidence of delivery, including return receipts or certified mail records. If the defendant refuses service or it fails, the plaintiffs shall provide proof of denial or proof of efforts, together with proof that they delivered notice of rejection to the defendant by regular mail or other ways, as required by law and case law.

If service was done via other international means, the plaintiffs should include foreign service certificates, translations, and any court rulings that allow for alternative service. If you don’t provide enough evidence of service, the New York court may throw out the case or declare that service is faulty, which means the court doesn’t have jurisdiction over the defendant.

Factors to consider for process service

A defendant’s temporary stay in New York may not last long. Plaintiffs should keep a close eye on the defendant’s whereabouts and write down when they arrive and leave, where they stay in New York, and any attempts to find or move the defendant. If a defendant departs New York before service is finished, the plaintiffs must quickly look for other ways to serve them or ask for extensions.

Process servers should find out when the defendant will be in New York, where they will be, and whether they have other locations or could depart the state shortly. This information may affect the service approach and when to file motions for replacement service. It might be good to plan ahead, such knowing where the defendant’s location may be. 

CPLR 306-b sets a deadline of 120 days for serving a summons and complaint in New York. Process servers should prepare service ahead of time, particularly for transitory defendants. If service can’t be completed on time or if defendants leave before service can be completed, plaintiffs could ask for extensions under CPLR 306-b. Plaintiffs should quickly ask for a new service or an extension if service is late or doesn’t happen. 

Planning for if the Defendant is not located in New York

If the defendant can’t be reached in New York, is avoiding service, or has left the state, the plaintiff should file a petition under CPLR 308(5) asking for alternative or substituted service. The motion should explain why standard means won’t work, how many times the defendant has tried to serve the papers, and why the defendant is only in New York for a short time.

If the defendant departed New York, the plaintiffs should say that they tried to serve them in person (or couldn’t) while they were there and that other ways of serving them are okay. Plaintiffs should seek the court to let them use techniques that are likely to provide notice, such as sending a summons to the defendant’s last known address, email or electronic service, publishing, or other ways. If necessary, plaintiffs could also ask for further time to serve the defendant beyond the 120-day limit.

Plaintiffs and process servers should not serve temporary defendants on Sunday, even if they are in another state at the time, since New York law does not allow civil process service on Sunday. This is true unless the service is specifically allowed by law.

International service is especially difficult since foreign service rules, treaty duties, and possible language and translation problems might all be different. Plaintiffs need to think carefully about whether foreign law allows mail or courier service, whether documents need to be translated or certified, whether diplomatic channels or Hague Convention mechanisms are needed, and whether alternate service is needed if foreign law doesn’t allow mail service. Plaintiffs should also be ready for the possibility that foreign defendants would contest service because it doesn’t follow foreign law or international treaties.

Trusted Legal References for New York Process Service

Undisputed Legal Inc. – New York Process Service
Provides licensed and professional process serving throughout New York, ensuring compliance with CPLR rules and court-approved service methods.
Phone Number: 212-203-8001

New York State Unified Court System – Civil Practice Law & Rules (CPLR)
Establishes the legal framework for service of process in New York, including acceptable methods such as personal service, substituted service, and service by mail.
Phone Number: 800-268-7869

New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection – Process Server Resources
Oversees the licensing and regulation of New York City process servers, setting ethical standards and compliance rules.
Phone Number: 212-639-9675

New York County Lawyers Association – Civil Practice Resources
Provides guidance, legal resources, and continuing education for attorneys dealing with process service and civil procedure in New York.
Phone Number: 212-267-6646

U.S. District Court – Eastern District of New York: Service of Process
Outlines federal-level rules and requirements for service of process in New York under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Phone Number: 718-613-2600

Additional Resources

Best Practices For How to Serve Out-of-State or Foreign Defendants Visiting New York

I. Check jurisdiction and presence early: Find out whether the defendant is subject to New York personal jurisdiction under CPLR 301 or 302, or if they are just temporarily present, if that is enough to justify service and jurisdiction. whether the defendant is only in New York for a short time, think about whether service should be tried while they are there or whether the plaintiff should depend on long-arm jurisdiction.

II. Plan when to serve the papers:  If you know the defendant will only be in New York for a short time, serve them early on in their stay. Check the dates, places, and addresses where the defendant is expected to be. Make sure that the jurisdiction of the case is applicable on the defendant.

III. Maintain records of all service attempts: Process servers should maintain complete service logs that include attempts, refusals, whether or not the defendant was present, trips to their residence, notifications left, and any proof of departure. If the defendant departs New York, write down the date they left and any follow-up actions taken. If you try to deliver via mail or courier, save the receipts, tracking information, and notifications of rejection. If necessary, provide affidavits of notification or attempted mailing.

If personal service in New York isn’t practicable or doesn’t work, submit a petition under CPLR § 308(5) for alternate service as soon as possible. The motion should include previous efforts at serve and explain why conventional service won’t work or why the defendant has moved out of state. If you need more time to serve, ask for it under CPLR § 306-b.

IV. Be ready for service problems: Defendants may try to have default judgements thrown out or set aside because of bad service, wrong jurisdiction, or lack of notice. Plaintiffs should make sure they have written down their service plan, made their jurisdiction clear, and followed all the rules set forth in the CPLR and the law. If plaintiffs think the defendant will contest service, gathering extensive proof of service efforts and notification may lower the chance of having judgements thrown out.

Because jurisdiction and default judgements are so important, plaintiffs and process servers should be very careful to follow all of the rules, both procedural and constitutional. This is particularly true when the defendants are only in New York for a short time. To make sure that people can get to court and to reduce the chance of service-related issues or jurisdictional problems, a well-documented and legally competent process service plan  made by a stellar process service agency like Undisputed Legal is necessary.

Case Studies: How to Serve Out-of-State or Foreign Defendants Visiting New York

Case Study 1: Business Executive from London
A corporate executive visiting Manhattan for a two-day conference was served within hours of arrival. Undisputed Legal coordinated with local servers to ensure timely service, preventing costly delays in the client’s lawsuit.

Case Study 2: Defendant Avoids Service
In a Queens real estate dispute, the defendant from Florida attempted to evade service while visiting relatives. Our team tracked the defendant’s movements, executed substituted service under CPLR 308(2), and secured jurisdiction for our client.

Case Study 3: Time-Sensitive Divorce Filing
A plaintiff needed to serve divorce papers on a spouse visiting from Canada. With only a 24-hour window, Undisputed Legal arranged immediate service, documented everything, and provided a valid affidavit of service that the court upheld without challenge.

Why Choose Undisputed Legal?

At Undisputed Legal, we understand the complexities of how to Serve Out-of-State or Foreign Defendants Visiting New York. Our process servers act quickly and strategically to ensure proper service before the defendant departs. With years of experience handling out-of-state and international service, we know how to anticipate challenges, comply with CPLR requirements, and protect your case from dismissal. Clients rely on us for our precision, responsiveness, and unmatched knowledge of both domestic and international process service.

Order Process Service Today

Don’t risk losing your chance to serve a transient defendant. When time is short, you need speed, compliance, and accuracy. Trust Undisputed Legal to handle your case with professionalism and urgency.

Call us today at (800) 774-6922 or order professional process service in New York now.

WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING

FOR ASSISTANCE SERVING LEGAL PAPERS

Click the “Place Order” button at the top of this page or call us at (800) 774-6922 to begin. Our team of experienced process servers is ready to assist you with reliable and efficient service of your documents, ensuring compliance with all legal requirements. We offer both comprehensive support and à la carte services tailored to your specific needs:

• Prompt and professional service of process
• Accurate completion of affidavits of service
• Rush service for time-sensitive matters
• Skip tracing for hard-to-locate parties
• Detailed reporting on service attempts

Don’t risk case delays or dismissals due to improper service. Let Undisputed Legal’s skilled team handle the important task of serving legal papers for you. Our diligent, professional service helps attorneys, pro se litigants, and parents ensure their papers are served correctly and on time.

Take the first step towards ensuring proper service in your case – click “Place Order” or call (800) 774-6922 now. Let Undisputed Legal be your trusted partner in navigating the critical process of serving your documents.

“Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives” – Foster, William A

Sources

¹ CPLR Section 308 lists many ways to serve papers:

1. CPLR 308(1) – The summons must be delivered in person to the party in New York.
2. CPLR 308(2) says that you may leave and mail the summons to the defendant’s home, business, or other place of business. You must also send a copy of the summons to the defendant’s address within 20 days.
3. CPLR 308(3): Delivery to an agent who is allowed to do so under CPLR § 318.
4. CPLR 308(4) says to nail and mail (put the summons on the door and send it) if all other attempts have failed.
5. CPLR 308(5): When standard means don’t work, the court might mandate alternative service. CPLR 308(5) lets plaintiffs use other ways to serve papers if they can establish that personal service is improbable or that other ways are essential to provide notice.

² Durgom v. Durgom, 47 Misc. 2d 513, 516-17, 262 N.Y.S.2d 874, 878-79

(N.Y. City Civil Ct 1965)

³ St. John’s Law ReviewSt. John’s Law Review Volume 54, Fall 1979, Number 1 Article 8, Maureen A. Glass

CPLR 308(4): Four Attempts to Serve the Defendant PersonallyCPLR 308(4): Four Attempts to Serve the = Defendant Personally During Business Hours Does Not Constitute Due DiligenceDuring Business Hours Does Not Constitute Due Diligence

⁴ Long-Arm Statute | Practical Law. (n.d.). Practical Law. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/2-507-2482?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true

⁵ Hahn, S. (2023, February 23). New York Courts Continue to Assert Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Banks | New York Commercial Division Round-Up Blog. New York Commercial Division Round-Up Blog. https://www.newyorkcommercialdivroundup.com/2023/02/articles/jurisdiction/new-york-courts-continue-to-assert-personal-jurisdiction-over-foreign-banks/

⁶ 510 F2d 870 (2d Cir. 1975) Sterling Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of N.Y. v. Fidelity Mortgage Investors.

⁷ BCL § 307(b) and (c) may necessitate further actions, such physically delivering a copy or sending a notification to the foreign company.

⁸ According to General Business Law § 11, service that takes place on a Sunday may be invalid ab initio, even if it happens outside of New York. This is because CPLR 313 includes the Sunday restriction

DIRECTIONS TO OUR NEW YORK CITY HEADQUARTERS

For access to our New York City corporate headquarters at One World Trade Center, 85th Floor, please click the embedded map and call ahead to be added to building security. Be sure to bring all necessary documents and payment to expedite your visit. Undisputed Legal Inc. maintains offices in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. We provide legal support services in all 50 states and over 120 countries worldwide.