HOW TO SERVE LEGAL PAPERS ON FREDDIE MAC

As of 2026, service of process on Freddie Mac (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) is governed by FRCP 4(j)(2) and 12 U.S.C. § 1452(c)(7). Service goes to the Office of General Counsel at 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA 22102. Freddie is a federally chartered GSE in FHFA conservatorship since September 6, 2008, with 60 days to respond after valid service under FRCP 12(a)(2).

Freddie Mac’s service architecture diverges from every other GSE in the federal mortgage market in one critical respect: the removal right. Unlike Fannie Mae — which was held in Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp., 580 U.S. 82 (2017), to lack automatic federal-court access because its sue-and-be-sued clause at 12 U.S.C. § 1723a(a) contains a “court of competent jurisdiction” qualifier — Freddie’s charter at 12 U.S.C. § 1452(c)(7) authorizes suit “in any State, Federal, or other court” with no qualifying language. Section 1452(f) goes further: it designates Freddie as a federal agency for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1442, enabling removal of any state-court action against Freddie to the federal district court where the action is pending. The Supreme Court’s own opinion in Lightfoot acknowledges this distinction expressly, noting that “[s]uits involving Freddie Mac may be brought in federal court.” A complaint filed against Freddie in state court will almost certainly be removed to federal district court, where the service affidavit is then evaluated against FRCP 4(j)(2) standards regardless of the state rules under which it was originally executed. The affidavit must be drafted to federal-court evidentiary standards from the first attempt.

The FHFA conservatorship — in its eighteenth year as of 2026 — controls Freddie Mac’s governance, capital structure, and operating decisions under 12 U.S.C. § 4617. It does not merge Freddie Mac’s corporate identity into FHFA, relocate Freddie’s legal department to FHFA’s Constitution Center, or authorize FHFA staff to accept legal process directed at Freddie as a corporate defendant. Freddie retained its charter identity as a federally incorporated entity under 12 U.S.C. §§ 1451–1459 when FHFA assumed conservatorship on September 6, 2008, and that identity — including its capacity to be sued under § 1452(c)(7) — persists unchanged. Service of process runs to Freddie’s own Office of General Counsel at 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102. The FHFA Constitution Center at 400 7th Street SW, Washington DC 20219, is FHFA’s address, not Freddie’s. Papers delivered to FHFA on the theory that the conservator and the conservatee share a service address are rejected at intake, Freddie’s answer period never starts, and the limitations clock continues to run.

Freddie Mac has no state-by-state registered agent infrastructure. Unlike private state-chartered corporations that maintain CT Corporation, CSC, or NRAI as designated service agents in every jurisdiction where they do business, Freddie was chartered by Congress under the Emergency Home Finance Act of 1970 and operates under the federal charter codified at 12 U.S.C. §§ 1451–1459. Federal chartering carries no state-level registered agent obligation, and Freddie has not designated any commercial registered agent service in any state to accept process on its behalf. Service attempts directed through CT Corporation or any other registered agent produce a return marked as non-service: the agent has no authority to accept, the papers are refused or returned, and no proof-of-service affidavit can be sworn on a rejected delivery. The deadline passes without a compliant attempt on the record.

Undisputed Legal has provided GPS-verified process service documentation for federal corporation matters since 2010. Our licensed process servers operate from our headquarters at One World Trade Center, 85th Floor, New York, with offices in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Washington D.C., Texas, and Illinois — and through our nationwide network across all 50 states and 120 countries. For Freddie Mac matters centered in McLean and the Washington D.C. metro area, we deploy through our DC office.

Call (800) 774-6922 before your FRCP 12(a)(2) clock starts.

Order Freddie Mac Service Now

Why Service on Freddie Mac Is Procedurally Complex

Courts strictly enforce service requirements when GSE conservatees are named as defendants — and Freddie’s posture under HERA conservatorship combined with § 1452(f) federal-agency status means that defective service does not just delay the matter; it can produce removal-and-dismiss outcomes that reset the litigation clock entirely. Five structural features of Freddie Mac’s legal architecture generate the failure modes that recur most frequently in service attempts against this defendant. Each operates independently; counsel who neutralize one remain exposed to the others. All must be understood before the summons is drafted, because a service error that voids the attempt does not toll the limitations period — it simply passes time while the window closes.

Trap 1: McLean OGC vs. FHFA Constitution Center Address Confusion

Pro-se litigants and inexperienced counsel routinely attempt to serve Freddie Mac at the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s Constitution Center address at 400 7th Street SW in Washington DC, on the theory that since FHFA is Freddie’s conservator under HERA, FHFA must accept service for Freddie. This is wrong as a matter of statutory construction and routinely produces dismissed or quashed service. The conservatorship statute at 12 U.S.C. § 4617 vests conservator powers in FHFA, but it does not merge Freddie into FHFA as a single juridical entity — Freddie remains the chartered corporation under 12 U.S.C. §§ 1451–1459, and Freddie itself is the proper defendant in suits arising from Freddie’s mortgage purchases, REO holdings, contract obligations, and operational conduct. Service must be effected at Freddie’s Office of General Counsel, 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102. Courts in the Fourth Circuit and the District of Columbia have rejected service attempts directed at FHFA when the actual defendant was Freddie or Fannie, treating the conservator’s address as legally irrelevant for service-on-the-conservatee purposes. Freddie’s 60-day FRCP 12(a)(2) answer period does not begin until service is properly effected at OGC McLean — and every day spent at the wrong address is a day consumed from the limitations clock.

Trap 2: Regional Office Service Attempts

Freddie Mac maintains regional and field offices for loan-servicing oversight, REO management, and counterparty operations. None of these offices is a valid service address for legal process. The chartered corporation accepts service only at the Office of General Counsel in McLean. Servers who attempt to drop process at a regional office, an REO field office, or a Freddie-affiliated servicer’s premises produce service that is voidable on motion under FRCP 4(j)(2). After removal to federal court under § 1452(f), the matter is assessed under federal service standards — at which point regional-office service is almost certainly insufficient. This pattern produces procedural unwinds where a state-court suit, filed and nominally “served” at a regional office, is removed to federal district court, the removal sustained, and the service then quashed for want of FRCP 4(j)(2) compliance, requiring re-service at OGC McLean and a reset of the responsive-pleading clock. The re-service consumes whatever limitations window remains. Plan service at McLean from the first attempt; there is no procedural path that makes regional-office service retroactively valid.

Trap 3: Misapplying Lightfoot to Freddie Mac — The Inverted Framing

This trap is the precise inverse of the trap on Fannie Mae matters, and the inversion is critical. Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp., 580 U.S. 82 (2017), held that Fannie Mae’s sue-and-be-sued clause at 12 U.S.C. § 1723a(a) — which authorizes suit “in any court of competent jurisdiction, State or Federal” — does not by itself confer federal subject-matter jurisdiction; the qualifier “court of competent jurisdiction” defeats automatic federal access. Practitioners sometimes assume that Lightfoot applies equally to Freddie Mac. It does not. Freddie Mac’s charter at 12 U.S.C. § 1452(c)(7) authorizes suit “in any State, Federal, or other court” with no “competent jurisdiction” qualifier, and 12 U.S.C. § 1452(f) separately provides that Freddie is a federal agency for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1442 removal — meaning Freddie can remove any state-court action against it to the federal district court for the district where the action is pending. The Supreme Court’s own opinion in Lightfoot expressly distinguishes Freddie on these textual grounds and acknowledges that “[s]uits involving Freddie Mac may be brought in federal court.” The operational implication for service of process is significant: a state-court suit against Freddie will almost always end up in federal court after removal, so the server’s affidavit must be drafted to satisfy FRCP 4(j)(2) standards from the moment of service, regardless of where the complaint was originally filed. Applying Lightfoot‘s Fannie-specific analysis to a Freddie matter and concluding that federal-court access requires independent jurisdictional grounds is an error; § 1452(f) is the independent grant Fannie’s charter lacks.

Trap 4: Reading the HERA § 4617(f) Bar Too Broadly or Too Narrowly

12 U.S.C. § 4617(f) provides that “no court may take any action to restrain or affect the exercise of powers or functions of the [Director as conservator].” Two opposite errors regularly appear in litigation involving Freddie Mac. The first error is reading § 4617(f) too narrowly — assuming it only applies to suits that explicitly target FHFA, and thereby filing claims against Freddie that, in substance, would force FHFA to unwind a conservatorship-era decision. The Supreme Court’s decision in Collins v. Yellen, 141 S. Ct. 1761 (2021), made clear that § 4617(f) bars any suit whose remedy would restrain or affect the conservator’s exercise of statutory powers, regardless of how the suit is captioned. The second error is reading § 4617(f) too broadly — assuming the bar applies to any suit involving Freddie, including ordinary mortgage, contract, REO, and tort claims. It does not. Routine commercial and operational claims against Freddie proceed normally; § 4617(f) is not a blanket immunity. The line is whether the remedy sought would constrain the conservator’s statutory powers. Service of process is not affected by § 4617(f): service goes forward at OGC McLean regardless of how the merits ultimately play out. The § 4617(f) analysis belongs in the complaint-drafting stage, not the post-motion-to-dismiss briefing, because relief denied under § 4617(f) does not toll the statute of limitations.

Trap 5: Attempting FRCP 4(i) Service Instead of FRCP 4(j)(2)

A persistent error is treating Freddie Mac as if it were a federal agency for service-of-process purposes under FRCP 4(i), and accordingly attempting service on the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Attorney General at 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, and Freddie itself — a three-party belt-and-suspenders service attempt that wastes time and money and produces no legal benefit. FRCP 4(i) governs service on the United States and its agencies, departments, officers, and employees. Freddie Mac is none of these for service-of-process purposes. Freddie is a federally chartered corporation, and federally chartered corporations are served under FRCP 4(j)(2), which requires delivery of the summons and complaint to an officer, managing agent, or general agent of the corporation at its principal place of business. Section 1452(f)’s “federal agency” designation applies only to removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1442, not to FRCP 4 service classification. Serving the U.S. Attorney does not perfect service on Freddie; it is procedural surplusage that no court will treat as a substitute for FRCP 4(j)(2) service at OGC McLean. A motion to quash for improper service method is granted; counsel must re-serve within whatever limitations window remains.

Our Process for Serving Freddie Mac

Undisputed Legal executes service on Freddie Mac through licensed process servers operating in the Washington D.C. metro area and McLean, Virginia, with backup capacity through our nationwide network for multi-district matters. Service on Freddie Mac’s Office of General Counsel at 8200 Jones Branch Drive is available every business day. We do not route through intermediaries — every attempt is documented with GPS coordinates, delivery timestamp, and the name or title of the accepting party at Freddie’s OGC. That documentation package is produced as the proof-of-service affidavit before we close the service record.

Before dispatching, we confirm the service address against current OGC records. 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA 22102 is Freddie Mac’s corporate headquarters and the only address where legal process is accepted for the entity. We do not make assumptions about field offices, servicer locations, or FHFA-adjacent addresses. When counsel provides the summons and complaint, we verify that the defendant caption identifies Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation — not FHFA, not a Freddie-affiliated servicer, not a Freddie subsidiary operating under a separate entity name — before dispatch. Caption errors at this stage produce refusals at OGC intake that are treated as non-service.

For personal service, our GPS-verified affidavit records the address of acceptance, the time of delivery, the identity of the server, and the identity or title of the accepting party at Freddie’s Office of General Counsel. This documentation format satisfies FRCP 4(l)’s proof-of-service requirement and is accepted in every federal circuit. Because Freddie routinely removes state-court actions to federal district court under 12 U.S.C. § 1452(f), we construct the affidavit to satisfy FRCP 4(j)(2) standards from the outset — the matter will likely be assessed in the Eastern District of Virginia or the District of Columbia under federal evidentiary standards, and the affidavit must hold up in that forum regardless of the court where the complaint was originally filed.

For matters where counsel specifies USPS Certified Mail with Return Receipt Requested as the service method, we execute the certified mailing to Freddie OGC at 8200 Jones Branch Drive and preserve the signed PS Form 3811 return receipt as the proof-of-delivery record. Freddie’s OGC accepts Certified Mail RRR as an alternative to personal delivery. Ordinary first-class mail, priority mail, FedEx, UPS, and courier services not generating a signed return receipt do not satisfy FRCP 4(j)(2)’s documentation requirement — tracking confirmation that a package reached a ZIP code is not a signed acknowledgment from an authorized corporate representative and will not support a proof-of-service affidavit that survives a motion to quash.

Rush and same-day service are available for matters approaching the FRCP 4(m) 90-day service window or the applicable statute of limitations. The FRCP 12(a)(2) 60-day answer period begins on the date of valid service at Freddie OGC — not the date the complaint was filed, not the date of mailing. When the matter is time-sensitive, our DC metro operators deploy on the requested schedule and return the affidavit the same day service is completed. Freddie’s § 1452(f) removal posture makes precision in documentation more important, not less, when time pressure is a factor: after removal to federal court, any gap in the affidavit record invites a motion to quash that resets the clock entirely.

Undisputed Legal delivers documents prepared by counsel. We do not draft, file, or interpret pleadings; do not classify matters; do not advise on § 1452(f) jurisdictional strategy or § 4617(f) bar applicability; and do not prepare Notices of Claim or other litigation papers. Counsel governs the legal posture of the matter; we deliver the served copy and produce the GPS-verified affidavit that confirms the service act was completed at the correct address, in the correct form, by an authorized server.

Where to Serve Legal Papers on Freddie Mac

The single valid service address for legal process on Freddie Mac is the Office of General Counsel at Freddie Mac’s corporate headquarters, 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102. No other address — not FHFA’s Constitution Center, not Freddie’s regional field offices, not a Freddie-affiliated mortgage servicer — constitutes valid service on the corporate defendant. This is the legal consequence of how FRCP 4(j)(2) allocates service responsibility for federally chartered corporations: service requires delivery to an officer, managing agent, or general agent of the corporation. For Freddie Mac, that means the Office of General Counsel at McLean. Delivery anywhere else is not delivery to an authorized corporate representative, and no proof-of-service affidavit can honestly describe such a delivery as effective service on Freddie Mac.

The single most common address error in Freddie Mac service attempts is routing to the Federal Housing Finance Agency at 400 7th Street SW, Washington DC 20219. The error follows from the same logic that drives Fannie Mae routing mistakes: FHFA’s Constitution Center address appears prominently in news coverage, regulatory filings, and general-purpose searches for “FHFA Freddie Mac.” Counsel who see FHFA and Freddie Mac linked in virtually every media source about the conservatorship assume the two share a service address. They do not. FHFA is the conservator under 12 U.S.C. § 4617 — not Freddie Mac. Papers delivered to FHFA are rejected at intake; Freddie’s 60-day FRCP 12(a)(2) answer period never starts; and the limitations period continues to run against the plaintiff while counsel discovers and corrects the routing error.

Freddie Mac operates regional offices for mortgage servicing oversight, REO management, and counterparty relations. None carries authority to accept legal process. No regional office is designated to receive service of process on behalf of the corporation under FRCP 4(j)(2), and none has authority to act on behalf of the Office of General Counsel. Regional staff who receive attempted service will decline to accept or will return the documents without generating the signed acceptance record that FRCP 4(l) requires. Because Freddie removes most state-court actions to federal district court under § 1452(f), a regional-office service attempt that appeared nominally accepted will be assessed in federal court against FRCP 4(j)(2) standards — and will almost certainly be quashed.

Freddie Mac’s preferred stock trades on OTC markets under the symbol FMCC. Computershare serves as transfer agent for shareholder record-keeping. Transfer agents have no authority to accept process on behalf of the corporation and are not considered officers, managing agents, or general agents under FRCP 4(j)(2). An attempt to serve Freddie through its transfer agent produces the same non-service result as a registered-agent attempt: no authorized recipient, no signed acceptance, no valid affidavit, and a deadline that continues to pass.

Office	Status	Type	Authority	Address
Office of General Counsel	Active — correct service address	Federal corporation service	12 U.S.C. § 1452(c)(7); FRCP 4(j)(2)	8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA 22102
FHFA Headquarters — Constitution Center	NOT a Freddie Mac service address	Federal conservator/regulator only	12 U.S.C. § 4617 (conservator authority only)	400 7th Street SW, Washington DC 20219
Freddie Mac Regional / Field Offices	NOT service addresses	Operational only — no legal process authority	Not applicable for service of process	Various — do not serve here

If both FHFA and Freddie Mac are named as defendants in the same complaint — as occurs in certain HERA conservatorship challenges — they must be served separately: Freddie at 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean; FHFA at its Constitution Center address, 400 7th Street SW, Washington DC 20219. The entities are legally distinct defendants bearing separate answer obligations, separate defenses, and separate litigation counsel. FHFA’s conservatorship authority under § 4617 does not make it a proper service recipient for Freddie’s litigation, and serving FHFA when only Freddie is named does not constitute service on Freddie. Similarly, serving Ginnie Mae — a wholly-owned government corporation within HUD — follows a distinct federal framework; Ginnie Mae’s service rules are not interchangeable with Freddie’s private-charter framework under FRCP 4(j)(2).

This is the address error that produces quashed service and a reset responsive-pleading clock. Call (202) 655-4450.

Statutory and Regulatory Framework for Serving Freddie Mac

The framework governing service on Freddie Mac draws from four statutory and procedural layers that operate in sequence. Each must be satisfied independently. A failure at any layer — wrong defendant, wrong rule, wrong method, wrong court — produces a result that compliance at the other layers cannot cure.

12 U.S.C. § 1452(c)(7) — The Sue-and-Be-Sued Clause

Section 1452(c)(7) grants Freddie Mac the capacity to “sue and be sued, complain and defend, in any State, Federal, or other court.” Unlike Fannie Mae’s corresponding clause at 12 U.S.C. § 1723a(a) — which uses the phrase “court of competent jurisdiction, State or Federal” and was held in Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp., 580 U.S. 82 (2017) to be a capacity provision that stops short of independently conferring federal subject-matter jurisdiction — Freddie’s clause contains no “competent jurisdiction” qualifier. The Supreme Court’s analysis in Lightfoot turned specifically on the qualifier in Fannie’s charter, and the opinion expressly distinguished Freddie on that textual basis. Counsel litigating against Fannie and Freddie in the same action cannot apply a uniform jurisdictional analysis to both GSEs; the charter language diverges in the specific phrase that Lightfoot found dispositive. Freddie’s § 1452(c)(7) clause is the foundational authorization for its suability; § 1452(f) provides the additional federal-court access mechanism that Fannie’s charter lacks entirely.

12 U.S.C. § 1452(f) — Federal Agency Status and Removal Authority

Section 1452(f) provides that Freddie Mac is a federal agency for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1442 — the federal officer and agency removal statute — and that civil actions against Freddie may be removed to the federal district court for the district where the action is pending. This creates a structural reality in Freddie Mac litigation that has no counterpart in Fannie Mae matters: state-court filings naming Freddie as a defendant are removable as a matter of right, and Freddie exercises that right routinely. After removal, two service-related consequences follow. First, the service affidavit is evaluated under FRCP 4(j)(2) standards in federal court, without deference to whatever state service rules governed the original attempt. Second, a motion to quash defective service filed in federal court after removal is decided under federal procedural rules; state-court tolerance for technical service deficiencies does not carry over. Drafting the affidavit to FRCP 4(j)(2) standards at the first attempt is the only way to avoid the quash-and-re-serve cycle after removal. Section 1452(f)’s “federal agency” designation applies exclusively to § 1442 removal — it does not reclassify Freddie as a federal agency for service-of-process purposes under FRCP 4(i), which governs service on the United States and its Article II agencies.

12 U.S.C. § 4617 and § 4617(f) — Conservatorship Authority and the HERA Bar

The FHFA conservatorship established under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA, Public Law 110-289) remains operative as of 2026. Section 4617 granted FHFA succession to all of Freddie’s rights, titles, powers, and privileges as conservator — including authority over governance, asset management, and capital allocation. This operational succession generates the address confusion described above; it does not redirect Freddie’s litigation machinery to FHFA’s Constitution Center. Section 4617(f) imposes the categorical anti-injunction bar: no court may take any action to restrain or affect FHFA’s exercise of its conservatorship powers. Collins v. Yellen, 141 S. Ct. 1761 (2021), confirmed the reach of this bar and settled disputes about its scope in the context of the Third Amendment net-worth-sweep challenge. The § 4617(f) analysis belongs in the complaint-drafting stage — counsel must confirm before filing whether the pleaded relief runs against Freddie’s own corporate obligations (permissible) or against FHFA’s conservatorship conduct (barred). Service of process is not affected by § 4617(f): service goes forward at OGC McLean regardless of how the merits ultimately play out, and a challenge to the merits under § 4617(f) does not substitute for or toll the obligation to effect proper service within the FRCP 4(m) window.

FRCP 4(j)(2) — Service on Federally Chartered Corporations

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(j)(2) is the controlling service provision for Freddie Mac. Service on a federally chartered corporation is effected by delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to the corporation’s chief executive officer or to the corporation’s registered office. For Freddie Mac, that means the Office of General Counsel at 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102, by personal delivery or USPS Certified Mail with Return Receipt Requested. Counsel who attempt FRCP 4(i) service on Freddie — serving the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia and the Attorney General in addition to, or instead of, Freddie’s OGC — execute service on parties who have no power to accept on Freddie’s behalf. The motion to quash for improper method is granted; service is voided; and counsel must re-serve within whatever limitations window remains.

FRCP 12(a)(2) — Freddie Mac’s 60-Day Answer Period

Under FRCP 12(a)(2), a United States agency or corporation properly served has 60 days to answer — not the standard 21-day window applicable to most private corporate defendants. The 60-day period begins on the date of valid service at Freddie’s Office of General Counsel. Service at FHFA’s Constitution Center address, at a regional office, through a registered agent without authority to accept, or by any method other than personal delivery or Certified Mail RRR does not start the period. Until proper service is effected, Freddie has no obligation to answer and the action cannot proceed. A motion for default judgment against Freddie before the 60-day window has opened will be denied — courts will not enter default against a defendant whose answer period has not begun because service was defective.

Scope of Services: What Undisputed Legal Does and Does Not Do

Undisputed Legal delivers documents prepared by counsel. We do not prepare Notices of Claim, classify matters, track statutory deadlines as a compliance service, verify caption sufficiency, or review pleadings. Counsel performs all legal acts. We perform service acts and produce GPS-verified affidavits.

In Freddie Mac litigation, the division of responsibility operates as follows: Counsel prepares the summons and complaint, confirms federal subject-matter jurisdiction and § 1452(f) removal posture, structures pleaded relief to account for the HERA § 4617(f) bar where applicable, and tracks the FRCP 12(a)(2) 60-day answer period after we confirm service. We deliver the served copy to Freddie’s Office of General Counsel at 8200 Jones Branch Drive and provide the GPS-verified affidavit documenting place, time, and accepting party at Freddie’s OGC. Counsel confirms defendant identity — Freddie Mac at 8200 Jones Branch Drive versus FHFA at 400 7th Street SW versus Freddie-affiliated servicers at their operational addresses — before issuing service instructions. We execute on those instructions, document service in the form federal courts require, and return the GPS-verified affidavit as the proof-of-service record.

Service Tier	Description	Price Range
Routine Service	Standard service window for non-time-critical matters	$100–$150
Rush Service	24–48 business hour completion for matters approaching FRCP 4(m) deadlines	$200–$250
Same-Day Service	Same-day attempt for matters within 72 hours of statute of limitations	$250–$300
Stake-Out Service	Repeated attempts at office over multi-hour windows	$325–$425
Skip Trace	Defendant location research when current address is unverified	$75

50% discount per additional individual served at the same address on the same order.

Frequently Asked Questions: Serving Freddie Mac

Does Freddie Mac accept service of process at its regional offices?

No. Freddie Mac’s regional and field offices handle loan-servicing oversight, REO management, and counterparty operations. None is authorized to accept service of process on behalf of the corporation. Under FRCP 4(j)(2), service on a federally chartered corporation requires delivery to an officer, managing agent, or general agent at the corporation’s principal place of business — for Freddie Mac, that is the Office of General Counsel at 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102. Service attempted at a regional office is voidable on motion; after Freddie removes the action to federal district court under § 1452(f), the defect will almost certainly result in the service being quashed, requiring re-service at OGC McLean within whatever limitations window remains.

Why can’t I serve Freddie Mac through FHFA?

FHFA is the conservator of Freddie Mac under 12 U.S.C. § 4617 — it is not Freddie Mac. FHFA assumed conservatorship powers over Freddie’s governance and assets on September 6, 2008, but Freddie retained its identity as a separately suable legal entity under 12 U.S.C. § 1452(c)(7). Service of process still runs to Freddie Mac’s own Office of General Counsel at 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102 — not to FHFA at Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, Washington DC 20219. FHFA staff accept service on behalf of FHFA as an institutional defendant; they do not accept service on behalf of Freddie Mac as a separate corporate entity. Papers delivered to FHFA are rejected; Freddie’s 60-day FRCP 12(a)(2) answer period never starts; and the limitations clock continues to run.

Will my state-court suit against Freddie Mac stay in state court?

Almost certainly not. 12 U.S.C. § 1452(f) designates Freddie Mac as a federal agency for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1442 removal, meaning Freddie can remove any state-court civil action against it to the federal district court for the district where the action is pending. Freddie exercises this right routinely. After removal, the service affidavit is evaluated under FRCP 4(j)(2) standards in federal court, regardless of the state service rules under which the original attempt was made. Service documented to federal-court standards at the first attempt is the only way to avoid a quash motion after removal. For most Freddie Mac matters, the operative court will be the Eastern District of Virginia or the District of Columbia, depending on where the complaint was originally filed.

Does the Lightfoot decision limit my ability to sue Freddie Mac in federal court?

No. Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp., 580 U.S. 82 (2017), addressed Fannie Mae’s charter, not Freddie’s. The Court held that Fannie’s sue-and-be-sued clause at 12 U.S.C. § 1723a(a) — which uses the qualifier “court of competent jurisdiction” — does not independently confer federal subject-matter jurisdiction. Freddie Mac’s charter at 12 U.S.C. § 1452(c)(7) uses the phrase “any State, Federal, or other court” with no such qualifier, and the Lightfoot opinion expressly distinguishes Freddie and states that “[s]uits involving Freddie Mac may be brought in federal court.” Section 1452(f) provides an additional and independent basis for federal-court jurisdiction via removal. Applying Lightfoot‘s Fannie-specific analysis to a Freddie matter is a textual error; the two charters diverge in exactly the language the Court found dispositive.

What happens if I serve Freddie Mac under state service rules?

State-court service executed under state rules may appear valid until Freddie removes the action to federal district court under § 1452(f). After removal, the service documentation is assessed against FRCP 4(j)(2) — the federal standard for service on federally chartered corporations. State-law service that satisfied the originating court’s requirements may not satisfy FRCP 4(j)(2) if it was effected at a regional office, through an intermediary without authority to accept on Freddie’s behalf, or by a method that does not generate a signed proof-of-delivery record. Defective state-court service does not bootstrap into federal validity after removal. The motion to quash is granted, service is voided, and counsel must re-serve at OGC McLean within the remaining limitations window — which continues to run from the date the cause of action accrued, not from the date of removal.

Does HERA § 4617(f) bar my suit against Freddie Mac entirely?

No — § 4617(f) bars judicial relief that would restrain or affect FHFA’s exercise of its powers or functions as conservator. It does not bar all suits involving Freddie Mac. Ordinary breach-of-contract claims, mortgage servicing disputes, REO and property claims, discriminatory lending claims, and tort claims arising from Freddie’s own conduct as a corporate party are not categorically barred. The bar applies when the pleaded remedy would, if granted, constrain the conservator’s statutory functions — restraining a property disposition, modifying the governance structure, or challenging a conservatorship-era transaction such as the net-worth sweep. Collins v. Yellen, 141 S. Ct. 1761 (2021), provides the governing framework. The § 4617(f) analysis belongs in the pleading stage; service of process is not affected, and a meritorious service affidavit does not insulate a complaint that seeks relief § 4617(f) bars.

How quickly can Undisputed Legal serve Freddie Mac at McLean?

Same-day service is available for documents that arrive at our intake desk before 10 AM on a business day and are directed to Freddie Mac’s Office of General Counsel at 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102. Standard next-business-day service is available for all matters regardless of when documents arrive. Rush and same-day service are available for matters approaching the FRCP 4(m) 90-day service window or the applicable statute of limitations. When we dispatch on a rush or same-day basis, we return the GPS-verified affidavit the same day service is completed. Because Freddie routinely removes to federal court, we recommend confirming the service address and caption before dispatch — re-service after a removal-triggered quash consumes limitations time that cannot be recovered.

Do I also need to serve the United States under FRCP 4(i) when serving Freddie Mac?

No. FRCP 4(i) governs service on the United States, its agencies, departments, officers, and employees. Freddie Mac is a federally chartered corporation served under FRCP 4(j)(2) — not a federal executive agency served under FRCP 4(i). Section 1452(f)’s designation of Freddie as a “federal agency” applies only to removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1442; it does not reclassify Freddie as an Article II federal agency for service-of-process purposes. Attempting FRCP 4(i) three-prong service — serving the U.S. Attorney, the Attorney General, and Freddie simultaneously — is procedural surplusage that adds cost and complexity without satisfying the FRCP 4(j)(2) requirement. Service on the U.S. Attorney does not constitute service on Freddie and cannot substitute for direct service at OGC McLean.

Ready to Serve Freddie Mac?

Undisputed Legal executes service on Freddie Mac at 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102 every business day. Our GPS-verified affidavits satisfy FRCP 4(j)(2) documentation requirements and are constructed to hold up in the Eastern District of Virginia and the District of Columbia Circuit after § 1452(f) removal — because most Freddie Mac matters end up in federal court, and the affidavit that survives a post-removal motion to quash is the one drafted to federal standards at the first attempt. Rush and same-day service available for matters approaching FRCP 4(m) deadlines. Call (800) 774-6922 or order online.

Order Freddie Mac Service Now

Service routed to FHFA at Constitution Center is rejected — Freddie’s 60-day FRCP 12(a)(2) clock does not start until proper service at OGC McLean, and the action stalls while the limitations period continues to run.